Page 56 - JSOM Winter 2025
P. 56

care team, which may consist of both medics and non-medical   granulation tissue formation. This phase is also an opportunity
          assistants.                                        to reassess antimicrobial therapy, ensure proper nutrition and
                                                             hydration, and prepare for delayed primary closure. Primary
          Infection Risk in Prolonged Casualty Care          surgical interventions at this phase aim to stabilize the wound
          and the Role of MDRO                               for potential prolonged holding or transfer.
          Prolonged casualty care scenarios are commonly associated
          with increased wound complexity, prolonged patient holding   Plane: Evacuation and Tertiary Integration
          time, and reduced medical access.  Wounds sustained in dirty   Evacuation should be accompanied by clear documentation
                                    7
          environments may be contaminated with soil and/or organic   of wound care, microbiological findings, and antibiotic use.
          debris, leading to anaerobic or polymicrobial infections.  Mod-  In-transit wound care—including re-irrigation and dressing
                                                     8
          ifiable factors on the part of medical providers include im-  maintenance—may reduce infection exacerbation en route.
          proper dressings or wound care techniques, reported overuse   Field studies have demonstrated that poorly managed transfers
          of tourniquet application for non-life-threatening hemorrhage   increase nosocomial infection risk at higher echelons of care.
                                                                                                            16
          (leading to prolonged ischemia, necrosis and devitalized tis-  Therefore, MDRO containment measures during transport,
          sues), and lack of prophylactic antibiotics; unmodified, these   including barrier precautions, are essential. Medical treatment
          factors exacerbate the risk of complex wound infection. 9,10    facilities may offer basic diagnostic support and field micro-
          Modern microbiology confirms that MDROs, particularly   biology. According to recent studies, point-of-care molecular
          gram-negative organisms, are emerging as dominant pathogens   diagnostics can identify MDROs even in austere environ-
          in war wound infections.  Infection control is further compli-  ments. 17,18   Infections  confirmed  at  this  phase  should  trigger
                             11
          cated by the lack of laboratory capacity and real-time diagnos-  empiric antibiotic regimens aligned with JTS sepsis guidelines,
          tics in the field impeding the development of theater specific   which recommend source control, hemodynamic support, and
          antibiograms, further inhibiting the ability to adjust antibiotic   antimicrobial de-escalation based on culture results.  Basic in-
                                                                                                     13
          selection to the resistance profile(s). The prevalence of infec-  fection control protocols, even in limited settings, are essential
          tions caused by MDROs in the context of warfare is a major   to prevent facility-wide spread.
          problem, drawing increasing scrutiny. 12
                                                             Table  1  summarizes  the  different  stages  of  the  Ruck-Truck-
          Ruck: Point-of-Injury Measures                     House-Plane model for preventing combat-related wound in-
          At the point of injury, wound management begins with careful   fections and spread of multidrug-resistant organisms.
          assessment of penetrating injuries and determination of need
          for hemorrhage control techniques, to include assessment of   Conclusion
          applied tourniquets and pressure dressings as well as depth
          and complexity of wounds. For those wounds that appear   Wound infection in prolonged casualty care and prolonged
          deep or with vascular compromise, large irrigation and rough   care conditions could emerge as another cause of preventable
          debridement can be attempted early to minimize contamina-  death in the died-of-wounds population in future LSCOs. Fur-
          tion. All wounds sustained in a combat or operational envi-  thermore, this risk is associated with the spread of MDROs,
          ronment should be assumed to be grossly contaminated, and   representing a global issue that transcends theater borders. A
          removal of debris is essential. For irrigation, potable water can   dedicated application of a Ruck-Truck-House-Plane progres-
          be used and is generally acceptable, if typical sterile irrigation   sion model, as described above, during prolonged care, from the
          solution is not available. According to Joint Trauma System   point of injury through to definitive hospital transfer, provides
          (JTS) guidelines, early cleansing reduces bacterial load and   a phased approach for combat medics, nurses, and physicians
          prevents infection progression.  Early prophylactic antibiotics   to limit the risk of secondary infection as well as the spread
                                  13
          should be considered for open fractures or high-risk penetrat-  of multidrug-resistant organisms. Simple initial procedures to
          ing wounds, as endorsed in recent trauma guidelines.  In the   clean the wound with rough debridement and irrigation should
                                                    14
          austere settings implied in prolonged casualty care, medics or   be combined with timely surgery when indicated. Such strate-
          medical teams can implement these basic interventions to de-  gies require further studies to assess their potential impact on
          lay or reduce the severity of infection before evacuation.  the outcome of combat casualties as well as dedicated training
                                                             to improve skills and knowledge of this emerging risk.
          Truck: Continuation of Basic Medical Procedures
          The Truck phase was originally designed as a CASEVAC plat-  Author Contributions
          form: a truck with a small compartment, with no surgical   PP designed the study, conducted the literature search and
          capabilities. Due to ongoing movement, it is very difficult to   wrote the manuscript. PP, PL, MD, GV, TA, FJ, and SK criti-
          perform even the most basic procedures, particularly surgical   cally revised the manuscript.
          ones (wound debridement  or substantial irrigation), during
          transport. Interventions can be limited to the most basic med-  Disclosures
          ical procedures, with a focus on wound assessment and reas-  The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
          sessment, tourniquet evaluation, and attempting conversion as
          soon as possible, including during this Truck phase.  Disclaimer
                                                             The opinions or assertions expressed herein are the private
          House: Initial Surgical Access and                 views of the authors and are not to be considered as reflecting
          Field Interventions Field Hospitals and Surveillance  the official views of the French Military Medical Service, and
          Once the casualty reaches a basic facility or a building of op-  the different institutions.
          portunity, wound inspection and further debridement should
          be performed. Necrotic tissue must be excised to prevent sep-  Funding
          sis. Clean, moist dressings protect wound edges and promote   This study did not receive any funding.
            15
          54  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 4 / Winter 2025
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61