Page 54 - JSOM Winter 2025
P. 54

of the Human Factors Society  Annual Meeting. 1991;35(19):   29.  Crozier MS, Ting HY, Boone DC, et al. Use of human patient sim-
             1417–1421. doi:10.1177/154193129103501917          ulation and validation of the Team Situation Awareness Global
          17.  Mathieu JE, Heffner  TS, Goodwin GF, Salas E, Cannon-   Assessment Technique (TSAGAT): a multidisciplinary team as-
             Bowers JA. The influence of shared mental models on team pro-  sessment tool in trauma education. J Surg Educ. 2015;72(1);156–
             cess and performance. J Appl Psychol. 2000;85(2):273–283. doi:   163. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.07.009
             10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273                      30.  Hultin M, Jonsson K, Härestam M, Lindkvist M, Brulin C. Re-
          18.  Nichols R, Noury L. Assessing baseline proficiency of National   liability of instruments that measure situation awareness, team
             Guard combat medics due for recertification: a pilot study. Mil   performance and task performance in a simulation setting with
             Med. 2023;188(1-2):e37–e41. doi:10.1093/milmed/usab525  medical students. BMJ Open. 2019;9(9):e029412. doi:10.1136/
          19.  Williams GC, Deci EL. Internalization of biopsychosocial values   bmjopen-2019-029412
             by medical students: a test of self-determination theory. J Pers Soc   31.  Endsley MR. A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct ob-
             Psychol. 1996;70:767–779. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.4.767  jective measures of situation awareness: a comparison of SAGAT
          20.  Tanaka M, Mizuno K, Fukuda S, Tajima S, Watanabe Y. Per-  and SPAM.  Hum Factors.  2021;63(1):124–150. doi:10.1177/
             sonality  traits  associated  with  intrinsic  academic  motivation  in   0018720819875376
             medical students. Med Educ. 2009;43(4):384–387. doi:10.1111/j.   32.  Endsley MR.  Toward a theory of situation awareness in dy-
             1365-2923.2008.03279.x                             namic systems.  Hum Factors.  1995;37(1):32–64. doi:10.1518/
          21.  Motivation and learning. Can Med Assoc J. 1969;100(13):623–624.  001872095779049543
          22.  Pelaccia T, Viau R. Motivation in medical education. Med Teach.   33.  Munir A, Aved A, Blasch, E. Situational awareness: techniques,
             2017;39(2):136–140. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2016.1248924  challenges, and prospects.  AI (Switzerland).  2022;3(1):55–77.
          23.  Orsini C, Binnie VI, Wilson SL. Determinants and outcomes of   doi:10.3390/ai3010005
             motivation in health professions education: a systematic review   34.  Anton NE, Huffman EM, Ahmed RA, et al. Stress and resident in-
             based on self-determination theory.  J Educ Eval  Health Prof.   terdisciplinary team performance: results of a pilot trauma simu-
             2016;13:19–23. doi:10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.19        lation program. Surgery. 2021;170(4):1074–1079. doi:10.1016/j.
          24.  Kusurkar R, Croiset G, Kruitwagen C, ten Cate O. Validity ev-  surg.2021.03.010
             idence for the measurement of the strength of motivation for   35.  Allard MA, Blanie  A, Brouquet  A, Benhamou D.  Learning
             medical school. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011;16(2):   non-technical skills in surgery. J Visc Surg. 2020;157(3 Suppl 2):
             183–195. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9253-4             S131–S136. doi:10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2020.03.001
          25.  Reid J, Stone K, Brown J, et al. The Simulation Team Assessment   36.  Chen JJ, Gompers A, Evenson A, James BC, Royce C. Surgical ad-
             Tool (STAT): development, reliability and validation. Resuscitation.   aptation of the Situation Awareness Rating Technique (S-SART):
             2012;83(7):879–886. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.12.012  assessing situational awareness among medical students. J Surg
          26.  Hamilton N, Freeman BD, Woodhouse J, Ridley C, Murray D,   Ed. 2023;80(2):216–227. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.09.015
             Klingensmith ME.  Team behavior during trauma resuscitation:   37.  Jonsson  K,  Brulin  C,  Härgestam  M,  Lindkvist  M,  Hultin  M.
             a simulation-based performance assessment. J Grad Med Educ.   Do team and task performance improve after training situation
             2009;1(2):253–259. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-09-00046.1   awareness? A randomized controlled study of interprofessional
          27.  Cooper S, Porter J, Peach L. Measuring situation awareness in emer-  intensive care teams. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;
             gency settings: a systematic review of tools and outcomes. Open   29(1):73. doi:10.1186/s13049-021-00878-2
             Access Emerg Med. 2013;6:1–7. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S53679
          28.  Boet S, Etherington C, Larrigan S, et al. Measuring the teamwork   PMID: 41416981; DOI: 10.55460/XSJD-VE9V
             performance of teams in crisis situations: a systematic review of
             assessment tools and their measurement properties.  BMJ Qual
             Saf. 2019;28(4):327–337. doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008260








































          52  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 4 / Winter 2025
   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59