Page 53 - JSOM Winter 2025

with Dutch medical students’ autonomous forms of motiva- data. FW, JJ, and JBW analyzed the data. JBW wrote the first
tion and are general personality characteristics of Special draft, and all authors read and approved the final manuscript.
24
Operation Forces members. The authors did not use a generative artificial intelligence (AI)
tool or service to assist with preparation, data analysis or in-
The course case managers, observers/trainers, and evaluators terpretation of results. The authors take full responsibility for
systematically provide feedback as a dialogue, highlighting the the content of this publication. AI was utilized to refine the
good things and what should be improved, and focusing on language of the main body text after initial editing and review.
the team task rather than on the person. The relevance of pro-
viding timely and constructive feedback was identified as a Disclosures
way of supporting students’ intrinsic motivation. 23 The authors have nothing to disclose.
In our study, the best candidates exhibited a higher TAC Funding
LEADER ability. Consequently, partial compensation of medical No funding was received for this work.
ability by a strong tactical leading attitude cannot be excluded
and could explain in some way the non-superiority of EMTs at References
the end scores. However, in a face-to-face sub-analysis in this 1. Quinn J, Panasenko SI, Leshchenko Y, et al. Prehospital lessons
study, this possible superiority of the non-EMT candidates in from the war in Ukraine: damage control resuscitation and surgery
their TAC LEADER function did not appear as significant. experiences from point of injury to Role 2. Mil Med. 2024;189
(1–2):17–29. doi:10.1093/milmed/usad253
2. Flecha I, Naylor JF, Schauer SG, Curtis RA, Cunningham CW.
Furthermore, the final scores obtained at the final practi- Combat lifesaver-trained, first-responder application of junc-
cal examination were significantly correlated with the TAC tional tourniquets: a prospective, randomized, crossover trial. Mil
LEADER function. Furthermore, the best candidates were also Med Res. 2018;5(1):31–37. doi:10.1186/s40779-018-0178-1
showing a stronger TAC LEADER function with results one 3. Sonesson L, Boffard K, Lundberg L, Rydmark M, Karlgren K.
SD above the mean. Decision-making in management of the complex trauma patient:
changing the mindset of the non-trauma surgeon. World J Surg.
2018;42(8):2392–2397. doi:10.1007/s00268-018-4460-x
Because the main mission of tactical leader was to proactively 4. Ouverson KM, Ostrander AG, Walton J, et al. Analysis of com-
monitor SA. the non-EMT candidates from SOF troops were munication, team situational awareness, and feedback in a three-
shown to better address this issue. person intelligent team tutoring system. Front Psychol. 2021;12:
553015. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.553015
5. Bukoski A, Uhlich R, Bowling F, et al. Perceptions of simulator-
SA appears as a determinant in various domains such as bat- and live tissue-based combat casualty care training of senior spe-
tlefield, placement of military and air bases, air traffic control, cial operations medics. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl 1):78–85. doi:
emergency and/or disaster response. For specific populations 10.1093/milmed/usx136
like children or special conditions like trauma resuscitation, 6. Suresh MR, Valdez-Delgado KK, Staudt AM, et al. Predeployment
26
25
several evaluation tools of SA have been developed, 27,28,29 but training of Army medics assigned to prehospital settings. J Trauma
there is still a lack of tools to assess teamwork performance Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2S Suppl 2):S130–S138. doi:10.1097/TA.
during intraoperative crisis situations. Furthermore, litera- 0000000000003297
30
ture is still debating on the sensitivity, predictiveness, intru- 7. Suresh MR, Staudt AM, Trevino JD, et al. A deeper dive into combat
medic training. Mil Med. 2023;188(7–8):187–189. doi:10.1093/
siveness, or memory dependence of these tests. 31 milmed/usad050
8. De Lorenzo RA. How shall we train? Mil Med. 2005;170(10):824–
On an individual basis, after fusion of environmental infor- 830. doi:10.7205/milmed.170.10.824
mation, the SA levels of perception, comprehension, and pro- 9. Petersen CD, Rush SC, Gallo I, et al. Optimization of simulation
jection led to decision. 32,33 Among early trainees or military and moulage in military-related medical training. J Spec Oper Med.
2017;17(3):74–80. doi:10.55460/X6BB-TZ0C
on the battlefield, heightened stress, workload, and fatigue are 10. Endsley MR. Theoretical underpinnings of situation awareness: a
predictive of lower SA and decision-making in trauma and critical review. In: Endsley MR, Garland DJ, eds. Situation Aware-
surgical settings. 34,35 Fortunately, SA seems to be a learnable ness Analysis and Measurement. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates;
skill. Finally, at a team level, education in SA improved parts 2000:3–32.
36
of team performance in an acute care situation. 37 11. Wallace GR. NATO SOF transformation and development of
NATO SOF medical doctrine and policy. J Spec Oper Med. 2009;
9(3):7–13. doi:10.55460/O5AA-9AXG
Conclusion 12. Gala SG, Balsam MJ. Letter in response to: Kim M, Torrie I, Pois-
son R, Withers N, Bjarnason S, DaLuz LT, Pannell D, Beckett A,
Non-EMT candidates were able to score robustly, similarly to Tien HC. The value of live tissue training for combat casualty
their EMT counterparts, in an integrative, hyper-realistic, and care: A survey of Canadian combat medics with battlefield expe-
immersive course promoting multilevel processing at individ- rience in Afghanistan. Mil Med. 2017;182(9):e1834–e1840. Mil
ual and team levels. Non-EMT candidates, mainly from the Med. 2018;183(7–8):154–155. doi:10.1093/milmed/usx193
Belgian Special Operation Regiment, exhibited equal theoret- 13. Hoang TN, LaPorta AJ, Malone JD, et al. Hyper-realistic and
ical and practical results when compared to EMT candidates. immersive surgical simulation training environment will improve
team performance. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2020;5(1):
Some intrinsic parameters of the course could explain the e000393. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2019-000393
non-superiority of the clinically exposed groups, but compen- 14. Salas E, Cooke NJ, Rosen MA. On teams, teamwork, and team
sating intrinsic motivation and SA should be further explored performance: discoveries and developments. Hum Factors. 2008;
in the clinically naïve group. 50(3):540–547. doi:10.1518/001872008X288457
15. Kozlowski SWJ. Enhancing the effectiveness of work groups and
teams: a reflection. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2018;13(2):205–212. doi:
Author Contributions 10.1177/1745691617697078
FW, JJ, and DN conceived the study concept and recruited 16. Converse SA, Cannon-Bowers JA, Salas E. Team member shared men-
participants. FW, JJ, and JBW coordinated and collected the tal models: a theory and some methodological issues. Proceedings

Belgian Education System of Combat Medics | 51