Page 103 - JSOM Winter 2023

Although we could not capture differences on many of these 10. Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation
scales, qualitative comments of the participants in the PD in- of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS
dicate high satisfaction with the program in improving their scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. Jun 1988;54(6):1063–70. DOI:10.1037//
0022-3514.54.6.1063.
overall readiness (Appendix C). Overall, the PD and psycho- 11. Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of per-
logical domain metrics were most associated with PD partici- ceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. Dec 1983;24(4):385–396.
pation which is consistent with the goals of the PD. 12. Smith BW, Dalen J, Wiggins K, et al. The brief resilience scale:
assessing the ability to bounce back. Int J Behav Med. 2008;15
Author Contributions (3):194–200. DOI:10.1080/10705500802222972.
All authors were involved in conceiving the study concept. PG, 13. Weathers F, Litz B, Keane T, et al. The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5
DB, and KW coordinated and collected the data. TN and LY an- (PCL-5) – Standard Measurement Instrument. 2013. https://www.
alyzed the data. JR and GS assisted with subject recruitment and ptsd.va.gov/professional/assessment/adult-sr/ptsd-checklist.asp.
Accessed March 3, 2016.
coordination of data collection. TN and LY wrote the first draft 14. Russell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness
of the manuscript. All authors were involved in interpreting the Scale: Concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psy-
results and reviewing and approving the final manuscript. chol. 1980;39(3):472–480. DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.39.3.472.
15. Broadhead WE, Gehlbach SH, de Gruy FV, Kaplan BH. The
Disclaimer Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire. Measure-
The United States Army Special Operations Command ment of social support in family medicine patients. Med Care.
( USASOC) approved this publication for universal distribu- Jul 1988;26(7):709–723. DOI:10.1097/00005650-198807000-
00006.
tion. Colorado State University’s Institutional Review Board 16. Hotopf M, Hull L, Fear NT, et al. The health of UK military
approved the study protocol (15-6122H) in July 2016. The personnel who deployed to the 2003 Iraq war: a cohort study.
information, content, and conclusions do not necessarily rep- Lancet. May 27 2006;367(9524):1731–1741. DOI:10.1016/S0140-
resent the official position or policy of USASOC. 6736(06)68662-5.
17. Hanwella R, de Silva V. Mental health of Special Forces person-
Disclosures nel deployed in battle. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. Aug
2012;47(8):1343–1351. DOI:10.1007/s00127-011-0442-0.
The authors report no financial relationships relevant to this 18. Hawthorne G. Measuring social isolation in older adults: devel-
article to disclose. opment and initial validation of the friendship scale. Social Indi-
cators Research. 2006;77:521–548.
Funding 19. Locke HJ, Wallace KM. Short marital-adjustment and prediction
This work was supported as a subaward by the Preservation tests: Their reliability and validity. Marriage an Family Living.
of the Force and Family Behavioral Health Program award 1959;21(3):251–255.
number HU0001-15-2-0053 to the Consortium for Health 20. Tolan PH, Gorman-Smith D, Huesmann LR, Zelli A. Assessment
and Military Performance: A Defense Center of Excellence at of family relationship characteristics: A measure to explain risk
for antisocial behavior and depression among urban youth. Psy-
the Uniformed Services University. chological Assessment. 1997;9(3):212–223.
21. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life ques-
References tionnaire: assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life.
1. POTFF. “About POTFF: About USSOCOM Preservation of the J Couns Psychol. 2006;53(1):80–93.
Force and Family (POTFF). United States Special Operations 22. McCullough ME, Emmons RA, Tsang JA. The grateful disposi-
Command (USSOCOM).” Updated 2021. https://www.socom.mil/ tion: a conceptual and empirical topography. J Pers Soc Psychol.
POTFF/Pages/About-POTFF.aspx. Accessed November 2, 2020. Jan 2002;82(1):112–127. DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.112.
2. POTFF. Preservation of the Force and Family Program Evaluation 23. Smith CA, Hill JP. Toward the Measurement of Interpersonal
Plan: Human Performance & Psychological Performance. June 19, Generosity (IG): An IG Scale Conceptualized, Tested, and Vali-
2014:1–21. dated. University of Notre Dame, Calvin College; 2009. https://
3. Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief generosityresearch.nd.edu/assets/13798/ig_paper_smith_hill_rev.
Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. Mar 1994;23(2):129-138. pdf. Accessed April 5, 2016.
4. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, 3rd, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. 24. Thompson LY, Snyder CR, Hoffman L, et al. Dispositional forgive-
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychi- ness of self, others, and situations. J Pers. Apr 2005;73(2):313–59.
atric practice and research. Psychiatry Res. May 1989;28(2):193– DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00311.x.
213. DOI:10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4. 25. Koenig HG, Büssing A. The Duke University Religion Index (DU-
5. Lester PB, Harms, PD, Herian MN, Sowden, W J. A force for REL): A five-item measure for use in epidemological studies. Reli-
change: Chris Peterson and the US Army’s Global Assessment gions. 2010;1(1):78-85. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3390/rel1010078
Tool. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 2015;10(1):7–16. DOI: 26. Hoffman J, ed. NSCA’s guide to program design. Human Kinetics;
10.1080/17439760.2014.927904. 2012.
6. Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: 27. Marfell-Jones MJ, Stewart AD, de Ridder J. International standards
Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, eds. Measures in health psy- for anthropometric assessment. Wellington, New Zealand: Interna-
chology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: tional Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry; 2012.
NFER-NELSON; 1995:35–37. 28. Yuhasz MS. The effects of sports training on body fat in man with
7. Kroenke K, Strine TW, Spitzer RL, et al. The PHQ-8 as a measure predictions of optimal body weight. Dissertation. University of
of current depression in the general population. J Affect Disord. Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 1962.
Apr 2009;114(1–3):163–173. DOI:10.1016/j.jad.2008.06.026. 29. Cohen S, Williamson, G. Perceived stress in a probability sample
8. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for of the United States. In: Sapcapan S, Oskamp S, eds. The social
assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern psychology of health. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1988:31–67.
Med. May 22 2006;166(10):1092–1097. DOI:10.1001/archinte. 30. Nindl BC, Jaffin DP, Dretsch MN, et al. Human performance
166.10.1092. optimization metrics: Consensus findings, gaps, and recommen-
9. Bush K, Kivlahan DR, McDonell MB, et al. The AUDIT alcohol dations for future research. J Strength Cond Res. Nov 2015;29
consumption questions (AUDIT-C): an effective brief screening Suppl 11:S221–45. DOI:10.1519/JSC.0000000000001114.
test for problem drinking. Ambulatory Care Quality Improve- 31. Grier T, Anderson MK, Depenbrock P, et al. Evaluation of the US
ment Project (ACQUIP). Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Army Special Forces tactical human optimization, rapid rehabil-
Arch Intern Med. Sep 14 1998;158(16):1789–1795. DOI:10.1001/ itation, and reconditioning program. J Spec Oper Med. Summer
archinte.158.16.1789. 2018;18(2):42–48. DOI:10.55460/ZMF1-LOAH.

Physical Domain and POTFF | 101