Page 28 - JSOM Winter 2021
P. 28

A Prospective, Feasibility Assessment of a Novel,

                      Disposable Video Laryngoscope With Special Operations
                    Medical Personnel in a Mobile Helicopter Simulation Setting



                                                                                   2
                                                             1
                                  Steven G. Schauer, DO, MS *; Jessica Mendez, BS ;
                                           3
                                                                     4
                        Nguvan Uhaa, LVN ; Ian L. Hudson, DO, MPH ; Wells L. Weymouth, MD     5



          ABSTRACT
          Background: Video laryngoscopy (VL) is shown to improve   (72–89%) in several studies, which is most pronounced in the
          first-pass success rates and decrease complications in intuba-  prehospital setting. 4–6
          tions, especially in novice proceduralists. However, the cur-
          rently fielded VL devices are cost-prohibitive for dispersion   The widespread use of VL in the early 2000s offered a new
          across the battlespace. The novel i-view VL is a low-cost,   intubation modality. This was put in place to address this crit-
          disposable VL device that may serve as a potential solution.   ical capability gap to reduce complications, including better
          We sought to perform end-user performance testing and so-  first-pass success. VL allows the operator to view the airway
          licit feedback.  Methods: We prospectively enrolled Special   anatomy indirectly through a camera that projects onto a
          Operations flight medics with the 160th Special Operations   monitor.  Observational evidence suggests that first attempt
                                                                    7,8
          Aviation Regiment at Hunter Army Airfield, Savannah, Geor-  ETI success is higher with VL compared to direct laryngoscopy
          gia. We asked them to perform an intubation using a synthetic   (DL), which is particularly noted among operators with less
          cadaver model while in a mobile helicopter simulation setting.   airway management experience. Many of the military end us-
          We surveyed their feedback afterward. Results: The median   ers share this characteristic such as Special Operations medics
          age of participants was 30 and all were male. Of those, 60%   that may be intubating at or near the POI, including en route
          reported previous combat deployments, with a median of 20   to forward stage resuscitation teams. 9,10  Special Operations
          months of deployment time. Of the 10, 90% were successful   combat medics and flight paramedics are unique compared the
          with intubation, with 60% on first-pass success with an aver-  basic 68W combat medic in their training specific to ETI. This
          age of 83 seconds time to intubation. Most had a grade 1 view.   is because they undergo the Special Operations Combat Medic
          Most agreed or strongly agreed that it was easy to use (70%),   Course, which trains in advanced procedures and enables them
          with half (50%) reporting they would use it in the deployed   to sustain a casualty for up to 72 hours. That course includes
          setting. Several made comments about the screen not being   approximately 21.5 hours of ETI training (1.5 hours didactic,
          bright enough and would prefer one with a rotating display.   20 hours practice course, personal communication with COL
          Conclusions: We found a high proportion of success for intu-  Cord Cunningham, previous program director).
          bation in the mobile simulator and a high satisfaction rate for
          this device by Special Operations Forces medics.   VL offers a potential benefit for improved airway management
                                                             in these settings, particularly flight personnel where procedures
          Keywords: i-view; medic; airway; intubation; flight; helicopter;   have the additional technical challenges of performing them
          laryngoscopy                                       during transport. Supplying all Role 1 and 2 facilities with VL
                                                             equipment commonly used in US emergency departments, such
                                                             as the currently fielded Glidescope (Verathon; www.verathon

                                                             .com/glidescope), is not logistically possible due to the cost of
          Introduction
                                                             the device, power supply requirements, and periodic mainte-
          Airway compromise is the second leading cause of prevent-  nance/repairs of this equipment at far forward locations. The
          able death in the prehospital setting.  Endotracheal intuba-  US Army currently fields the Glidescopes to the forward surgi-
                                       1,2
          tion (ETI) is a crucial skill for prehospital medical personnel,   cal teams and the emergency/operating rooms of Combat Sup-
          especially during the Role 1 phase of care, in which critical   port Hospitals (with conversion into the new Field Hospital
          interventions are likely to have the largest impact. Part of the   model) at a cost of $12,292.67 each (National Supply Number
          Role 1 phase of care includes the initial transport of casual-  6515-01-572-7262). A new disposable, single-use video laryn-
          ties from the point-of-injury (POI) to a battalion aid station   goscope is on the market – the i-view ( Intersurgical; https://
          or forward-staged surgical teams. Airway management is the   us.intersurgical.com/info/iview) – at a cost of approximately
          first priority in the hospital setting in trauma patients who are   $100–$200 per unit (Figure 1). Given that this single-use device
          unable to protect their airway, according to Advanced Trauma   does not require maintenance and power sources, the i-view
          Life Support guidelines.  However, historically, ETI by direct   offers a potential opportunity to bring VL technology to Role 1
                             3
          laryngoscopy has been hindered by suboptimal success rates   and 2 facilities. Furthermore, the i-view as an expendable item
          *Correspondence to 3698 Chambers Pass, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX 78234; or Steven.G.Schauer.mil@mail.mil
          1 MAJ Steven G. Schauer,  Jessica Mendez,  Nguvan Uhaa, and  MAJ Ian L. Hudson are affiliated with the US Army Institute of Surgical Re-
                            2
                                        3
                                                      4
          search, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX. MAJ Schauer and MAJ Hudson are also affiliated with the Brooke Army Medical Center, JBSA Fort Sam
          Houston. MAJ Schauer is additionally affiliated with the 59th Medical Wing, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, and Uniformed Services University of the
          Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.  CPT Wells L. Weymouth is with the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment, Hunter Army Airfield, GA.
                                5
                                                           26
                                                           26
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33