Page 74 - JSOM Fall 2018
P. 74

Study participants completed a short questionnaire to deter­  application. The radial pulse was used to assess LOS in the up­
          mine study eligibility, including exclusion criteria (Figure 1). A   per limbs; the posterior tibial pulse was used to access LOS in
          total of 41 volunteers were included in the study. The median   the lower limb. The TQ was then activated by either inflating
          age was 28 (range, 22–48) years and 68% were male.  the cuff (pneumatic TQ), twisting the windlass rod (C­A­T),
                                                             or stretching and wrapping (SWAT­T). The TQ was left on as
          FIGURE 1  Study participants completed a short questionnaire.  long as necessary to record the pressure in the cuff, number of
             Please circle any of the below if you have a history of:  twists needed, or length of SWAT­T used to reach LOS, which
           Myocardial infarction (heart attack)              was approximately 30 seconds. The participant was allotted
                                                             2 minutes between each application to provide adequate time
           Stroke
                                                             for reperfusion of the limb before continuing the experiment.
           Heart surgery
           Congenital vascular defects                       We performed  t tests and  χ  tests to determine statistically
                                                                                    2
           Hypertension                                      significant differences between measured variables. Pain and
           Trauma to an extremity that required fasciotomy or surgery   pressure differences among anatomic comparisons were made
                                                             using the Wilcoxon signed­rank test. A p value ≤.05 was con­
           necessitating hospital stay                       sidered significant.
           Any comments or other health concerns you wish to reveal,
           please list below:
                                                             LOS

              Please write your answers in the underlined portion:  Pneumatic TQ
           What is your:                                     When using the pneumatic TQ, one examiner would activate
                                                             the TQ by increasing the pressure with digital dials while an­
           Sex:  Male ______  Female ______                  other examiner would assess Doppler signal. When using the
           Age (years): ______                               SWAT­T or C­A­T, one examiner would apply and adjust the
           Height (inches): ______                           TQs while the other would assess Doppler signal.
           Weight (lb): ______
                                                             C-A-T
                                                             With  the  C­A­T,  which  uses  a  windlass  rod,  the  number  of
          To investigate whether pain may be used to predict TQ effi­  twists was recorded to determine the LOS. Each application
          cacy, we sought to obtain pain values once TQs were deemed   began with placing the C­A­T snug on the limb (one location

          successfully placed. Three different TQ systems were used: a   and TQ application at a time), placing the TQ mid biceps, mid
          18.0 inch by 5.5 inch or 24.0 inch by 5.5 inch Stryker  Single­   forearm, mid thigh, or mid calf. The first 90° rotation of the
                                                   ®
          Belly Pneumatic Tourniquet (Sustainability Solutions,  http://   windlass placed the windlass parallel to the strap and was con­
          sustainability.stryker.com); 10.4cm elastic Stretch­Wrap­And­   sidered the baseline. From this point, the TQ was activate by
          Tuck Tourniquet (SWAT­T ; H&H Medical Corp, www.swat   twisting the windlass rod. The number of turns was recorded

                              ™
          tourniquet.com); and a 3.8cm­wide Combat Application   once LOS was reached. One twist was equivalent to 360°.
          Tourniquet Generation 6 (C­A­T ; C­A­T Resources Inc, www
                                   ®
          .combattourniquet.com) (Figure 2). TQs were applied to six   SWAT-T
          anatomic locations in random fashion: right upper arm (RUA),   To accommodate for differences in limb size when the SWAT­T
          right forearm (RFA), left upper arm (LUA), left forearm (LFA),   (Figure 2) was used, the circumference of each limb was first
          right thigh (RTH), and right calf (RCA). The circumferences   measured in centimeters. The SWAT­T was then wrapped
          of each of these sites were recorded in centimeters.  around the limb just once, without applying any compressing
                                                             force. The length of the SWAT­T that was not wrapped around
          For each TQ system, we used a 4MHz handheld Doppler ul­  the limb was considered the starting length. The SWAT­T was
          trasound (MedLine,  https://www.medline.com) to find LOS   then activated by stretching and wrapping the TQ around the
          and perceived this as loss of arterial pulse due to successful TQ   limb until LOS was reached. The remaining length of unused
                                                             SWAT­T was measured and this was subtracted from the start­
          FIGURE 2  Stretch Wrap-And-Tuck Tourniquet and the Combat   ing length to determine how much TQ was actually used to
          Application Tourniquet.                            occlude the vasculature.

                                                             Pain
                                                             With each TQ model, at each anatomic location, after the TQ
                                                             was activated and LOS was appreciated with Doppler, sub­
                                                             jects rated their pain on a 0 to 10 Visual Analog Pain Scale (0
                                                             being no pain, 10 being the worst pain; Figure 3). TQs were
                                                             removed once the pain rating was obtained.
                                                             FIGURE 3  Numeric pain scale.



                                                             0   1    2   3    4    5   6    7   8    9   10
                                                             No                  Moderate                Worst
                                                             pain                  pain                 possible
                                                                                                          pain


          72  |  JSOM   Volume 18, Edition 3 / Fall 2018
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79