Page 57 - JSOM Fall 2018
P. 57
the bag to keep pressures at or above 300mmHg. Although 4. Johnson M, Inaba K, Byerly S, et al. Intraosseous infusion as a
this was a pilot study, one of the two nonexcluded animals in bridge to definitive access. Am Surg. 2016;82(10):876–880.
the pushpull group died during infusion and the other had 5. US Army Institute of Surgical Research. Damage controlled resus
a concerning hypotensive episode. The pushpull and dou citation at level IIb/III treatment facilities. Joint Theater Trauma
blebarrel methods may confer a benefit in speed of transfu System Clinical Practice Guideline. 1 February 2103. http://jts
.amedd.army.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/JTS_Clinical_Practice_Guide
sion but should be further studied to determine the effect these lines_(CPGs)/Damage_Control_Resuscitation_03_Feb_2017
increased transfusion pressures have on clinical end points like _ID18.pdf. Accessed August 10, 2018.
hemolysis, fat emboli, hemodynamic stability, and shear stress 6. Tøndevold E, Eriksen J, Jansen E. Observations on long bone
injury to the bony matrix. addition, given the future need for medullary pressure in relation to mean arterial blood pressure
prolonged field care and the growing body of literature on IO in the anaesthetized dog. Acta Orthop Scand. 1979;50(5):527–
531.
blood transfusion, a combat practice guideline for IO use in 7. Hulse EJ, Thomas GO. Vascular access on the 21st century
the early echelons of care may be beneficial. military battlefield. J R Army Med Corps. 2010;156(Suppl 4):
S385–390.
Acknowledgments 8. Plewa MC, King RW, Fenn-Buderer N, et al. Hematologic safety of
We thank Dr Greg Zarow of the Combat Trauma Research intraosseous blood transfusion in a swine model of pediatric hem
Group for his mentorship, assistance with data interpretation, orrhagic hypovolemia. Acad Emerg Med. 1995;2(9):799–809.
and formal presentation. Research data were derived from an 9. Harris M, Balog R, Devries G. What is the evidence of utility for
intraosseous blood transfusion in damagecontrol resuscitation? J
approved Naval Medical Center, Portsmouth, Virginia, Insti Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(5):904–906.
tutional Review Board protocol No. NMCP 2016.0040. 10. Orlowski JP, Porembka DT, Gallagher JM, et al. Comparison
study of intraosseous, central intravenous, and peripheral intrave
Presentation nous infusions of emergency drugs. Am J Dis Child. 1990;144(1):
This study was presented at the 2017 Navy Wide Academic 112–117.
Research Competition, 25 May 2017, in Portsmouth, Virginia. 11. Dubick MA, Pteiffer JW, Clifford CB, et al. Comparison of in
traosseous and intravenous delivery of hypertonic saline/dextran
in anesthetized, euvolemic pigs. Ann Emerg Med. 1992;21(5):
Disclaimer 498–503.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and 12. Looker AC, Borrud LG, Hughes JP, et al. Total body bone area,
do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the bone mineral content, and bone mineral density for individuals
Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, or the US aged 8 years and over: United States, 1999–2006. Vital Health
Government. We are military service members and employees Stat 11. 2013;Aug(253):1–78.
of the US government. This work was prepared as part of our 13. Simmons CT. Henry Darcy (1803–1858): Immortalised by his
scientific legacy. Hydrogeol J. 2008;16(6):1023–1038.
official duties. Title 17 U.S.C. 105 provides that “Copyright 14. Gray WG, Miller CT. Examination of Darcy’s law for flow in po
protection under this title is not available for any work of the rous media with variable porosity. Environ Sci Technol. 2004;38
United States Government.” Title 17 U.S.C. 101 defines a US (22):5895–5901.
Government work as a work prepared by a military service 15. Aerssens J, Boonen S, Lowet G, Dequeker J. Interspecies differ
member or employee of the US Government as part of that ences in bone composition, density, and quality: potential impli
person’s official duties. cations for in vivo bone research 1. Endocrinology. 1998;139(2):
663–670.
16. Tsukamoto T, Pape HC. Animal models for trauma research:
Disclosure what are the options? Shock. 2009;31(1):3–10.
The authors have indicated they have no financial relation 17. Burgert JM, Mozer J, Williams T, et al. Effects of intraosseous
ships relevant to this article to disclose. transfusion of whole blood on hemolysis and transfusion time
in a swine model of hemorrhagic shock: a pilot study. AANA J.
Author Contributions 2014;82(3):199–202.
JDA, JBM, PJR, CMW, JEF, and TGD designed this study. All 18. National Research Council. Guide For the Care and Use of Lab-
authors contributed to the literature search. JDA and CMW oratory Animals. 8th ed. Washington, DC: National Academies
Press; 2010.
managed institutional review board submission. JDA, CMW, 19. Mitchell AD, Scholz AM, Pursel VG. Total body and regional
ACW, GAF, and ALK collected data. JDA, JLH, and MRG measurements of bone mineral content and bone mineral density
contributed to data analysis. JDA, JBM, JDK, PJR, CMW, in pigs by dual energy Xray absorptiometry. J Anim Sci. 2001;79
and TGD performed data interpretation. JDA JDK, JBM, PJR, (10):2594–2604.
CMW, and TGD contributed to writing the manuscript. All 20. Knudson BK, Hogberg MG, Merkel RA, et al. Developmental
authors participated in critical revision. All authors approved comparisons of boars and barrows: II. Body composition and
bone development. Anim Sci. 1985;61(4):797–801.
the final version of the manuscript. 21. Lairet JR, Bebarta V, Lairet K, et al. 79: Intraosseous pressure
infusion comparison using a rapid infusion device and a pressure
References bag in a swine model. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;56(3):S26–27.
1. Lewis P, Wright C. Saving the critically injured trauma patient: a 22. Mahoney PF. Combat Anesthesia: The First 24 Hours. Washing
retrospective analysis of 1000 uses of intraosseous access. Emerg ton, DC: Borden Institute; 2015.
Med J. 2015;32(6):463–467. 23. Toshniwal G, Ahmed Z, Sengstock D. Simulated fluid resuscita
2. O’Reilly DJ, Morrison JJ, Jansen JO, et al. Prehospital blood trans tion for toddlers and young children: effect of syringe size and
fusion in the en route management of severe combat trauma: a hand fatigue. Pediatr Anaesth. 2015;25(3):288–293.
matched cohort study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014;77(3): 24. Chatfield-Ball C, Boyle P, Autier P, et al. Lessons learned from
S114–120. the casualties of war: battlefield medicine and its implication for
3. Gordon W, Talbot M, Fleming M, et al. High bilateral amputations global trauma care. J R Soc Med. 2015;108(3):93–100.
and dismounted complex blast injury (CPG ID: 22). Joint Trauma 25. Pasley J, Miller CH, DuBose JJ, et al. Intraosseous infusion rates
System Practice Guidelines (LTS CPG). 26 July 2016. http:// under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites. J
www.usaisr.amedd.army.mil/cpgs/High_Bilateral_Amputations_ Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(2):295–299.
Dismnted_Cmplex_Blast_Injury_01Aug2016.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 26. Lairet J, Bebarta V, Lairet K, et al. A comparison of proximal
ruary 2018. tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the
Four Intraosseous Blood Transfusion Strategies | 55
