Page 52 - JSOM Fall 2018
P. 52

A Pilot Study of Four Intraosseous Blood Transfusion Strategies



                                                                                                 4
                     Jonathan Auten* ; Julie B. Mclean, PhD, CTR ; Jean D. Kemp ; Paul J. Roszko ;
                                                                 2
                                                                                 3
                                     1
                                                                                             7
                                                            6
                                         5
                         Grady A. Fortner ; Alyssa L. Krepela ; Alexandra C. Walchak, MS, CTR ;
                                                   8
                                                                      9
                           Chemely M. Walker, CTR ; Travis G. Deaton ; Joanna E. Fishback 10


          ABSTRACT
          Background: Intraosseous (IO) access is used by military first   IO blood transfusion can present technical challenges, because
          responders administering fluids, blood, and medications. Cur­  medullary pressure is approximately one­third of systemic
          rent IO transfusion strategies include gravity, pressure bags,   pressure. To improve IO transfusion flow rates, the pressure
                                                                    6
          rapid transfusion devices, and manual push­pull through a   gradient between bone and systemic circulation must be in­
          three­way stopcock. In a swine model of hemorrhagic shock,   creased. The existing literature has shown few associations
                                                                   7
          we compared flow rates among four different IO blood trans­  between increasing IO transfusion pressure gradients and sig­
          fusion strategies. Methods: Nine Yorkshire swine were placed   nificant clinical complications like pulmonary arterial fat em­
          under general anesthesia. We removed 20 to 25mL/kg of each   bolism, hemolysis, or coagulopathy. 1,8
          animal’s estimated blood volume using flow of gravity. IO ac­
          cess was obtained in the proximal humerus. We then autolo­  However, after a decade of use in combat settings, the broad
          gously infused 10 to 15mL/kg of the animal’s estimated blood   acceptance of IO blood transfusions in adult DCR is still ques­
                                                                  9
          volume  through one  of  four randomly  assigned  treatment   tioned. Clinical concern stems from foundational studies that
          arms. Results: The average weight of the swine was 77.3kg   used a skeletally immature swine model to determine the safety
          (interquartile range, 72.7kg–88.8kg). Infusion rates were as   of IO blood transfusions. 8,10,11  The bone density of a healthy
          follows: gravity, 5mL/min; Belmont rapid infuser, 31mL/min;   man 20 to 40 years old is roughly double that of skeletally
          single­site pressure bag, 78mL/min; double­site pressure bag,   immature swine used in those studies. 9,12  Bone density or me­
          103mL/min; and push­pull technique, 109mL/min. No pulmo­  dia permeability is a critical physical property in Darcy’s law,
          nary arterial fat emboli were noted. Conclusion: The optimal   which describes the relationship of fluid flow through porous
                                                                  13
          IO transfusion strategy for injured Servicemembers appears   media.  Darcy’s law predicts increased transfusion pressures
          to be single­site transfusion with a 10mL to 20mL flush of   are required to maintain or improve flow rates with increasing
                                                                                       14
          normal saline, followed immediately by transfusion under a   bone densities and fluid viscosity.  Current pressurized mili­
          pressure bag. Further study, powered to detect differences in   tary IO transfusion strategies include using gravity, pressure
          flow rate and clinical complications. is required.  bags, rapid­transfusion devices, and manual push­pull of a
                                                             syringe with a three­way stopcock.  Although swine are an
                                                                                         1,7
          Keywords: blood transfusion; operational medicine; intraos-  established model for human bone and cardiovascular physiol­
          seous infusion; intraosseous transfusion; hemorrhagic shock  ogy, the clinical effects of different pressurized IO transfusion
                                                             strategies in skeletally mature adults is not fully understood
                                                             and requires further investigation. 9,15–17
          Introduction
                                                             In this pilot study, we compared four different IO blood trans­
          Intraosseous (IO) access is used by military first responders   fusion strategies with varying degrees of transfusion pressure
          administering fluids, blood, and medications during remote   in a swine model with similar bone density to that of an adult
          damage­controlled resuscitation (rDCR).  Prehospital blood   Military Servicemember. We hypothesized that increasing trans­
                                          1
          transfusions for severely battle­injured military personnel   fusion pressures would lead to increased flow rates with nonsig­
          have been associated with an improvement in mortality in   nificant differences in rates of pulmonary arterial fat embolism,
          the austere environment.  Unfortunately, multisystem trauma,   coagulopathy, and periosteal damage at the transfusion site.
                             2
          such as dismounted complex blast injury, presents a vascular
          access challenge to even the most seasoned medical teams at­
          tempting to initiate rDCR.  In cases where access is difficult,   Methods
                               3
          IO catheters provide a noncollapsible method that serves as   All activities were approved by the Naval Medical Center
          a bridge to therapy while preparations are made for central   Ports mouth Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
          venous access. 4,5                                 and conducted in compliance with the Animal Welfare Act
          *Correspondence to Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Department of Emergency Medicine, 620 John Paul Jones Circle, Portsmouth, VA
          23708; or jonathan.d.auten.mil@mail.mil
                                                                                        7
                                                                       6
                                                                                                     8
          1 LCDR Auten, MC USN;  Dr Mclean;  LCDR Roszko, MC USN;  LT Fortner, MC USN;  LT Krepela, MC, USN;  Ms Walchak; and  Ms Walker
                            2
                                    4
                                                       5
          are at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Department of Emergency Medicine, Portsmouth, VA.  LCDR Kemp, MC USN, is at Naval Medical
                                                                             3
          Center Portsmouth, Department of Pathology, Portsmouth, VA.  CDR Deaton, MC USN, is at Naval Medical Center San Diego, Department of
                                                      9
          Emergency Medicine, San Diego, CA.  MAJ Fishback, VC, USA, is at Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Clinical Investigations Department,
                                     10
          Portsmouth, VA.
                                                           50
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57