Page 41 - JSOM Winter 2025
P. 41

References                                         12.  Keller A, Boukai A, Feldman O, Diamand R, Shavit I. Compari-
              1.  Szydlowski B, Nolte J, Vershilovsky E. Recent advances in intra-  son of three intraosseous access devices for resuscitation of term
                 osseous vascular access. Curr Emerg Hosp Med Rep. 2021;9(3):   neonates: a randomised simulation study. Arch Dis Child Fetal
                 82–88. doi:10.1007/s40138-021-00231-y              Neonatal Ed. 2022;107(3):289–292. doi:10.1136/archdischild-
              2.  Bielski K, Szarpak L, Smereka J, Ladny JR, Leung S, Ruetzler K.   2021-321988
                 Comparison of four different intraosseous access devices during   13.  Dornhofer P, McMahon K, Kellar JZ. Intraosseous vascular ac-
                 simulated pediatric resuscitation. a randomized crossover man-  cess. In:  StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed April
                 ikin trial.  Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176(7):865–871. doi:10.1007/  20, 2024. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK554373/
                 s00431-017-2922-z                               14.  Kyle AI, Auten JD, Zarow GJ, et al.  Determining intraosseous
              3.  Shavit I, Hoffmann Y, Galbraith R, Waisman Y. Comparison of   needle placement using point-of-care ultrasound in a swine (Sus
                 two mechanical intraosseous infusion devices: a pilot, random-  scrofa) model.  Mil Med. 2023;188(9–10):2969–2974. doi:10.
                 ized crossover trial.  Resuscitation. 2009;80(9):1029–1033. doi:   1093/milmed/usac108
                 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.026             15.  Looker AC, Borrud LG, Hughes JP, Fan B, Shepherd JA, Sherman
              4.  Hamam MS, Klausner HA, France J, et al. Prehospital tibial in-  M. Total body bone area, bone mineral content, and bone min-
                 traosseous drug administration is associated with reduced sur-  eral density for individuals aged 8 years and over: United States,
                 vival following out of hospital cardiac arrest: a study for the   1999-2006. Vital Health Stat 11. 2013;(253):1–78.
                 CARES Surveillance Group.  Resuscitation. 2021;167:261–266.   16.  Tannenbaum J, Bennett BT. Russell and Burch’s 3Rs then and
                 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.06.016            now: the need for clarity in definition and purpose. J Am Assoc
              5.  Kudenchuk PJ, Brown SP, Daya M, et al. Amiodarone, lidocaine,   Lab Anim Sci. 2015;54(2):120–132.
                 or placebo in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med. 2016;   17.  Teleflex. Arrow EZ-IO Intraosseous Vascular Access System. Tele-
                 374(18):1711–1722. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1514204       flex. Accessed August 30, 2024. https://www.teleflex.com/sea/en/
              6.  Lupton JR, Neth MR, Sahni R, et al. Survival by time-to-admin-  clinical-resources/ez-io/index.html
                 istration of amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in shock-refractory   18.  SAM Medical. SAM IO training. SAM Medical. Accessed August
                 out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Acad Emerg Med. 2023;30(9):906–  30, 2024. https://www.sammedical.com/blogs/training/sam-io
                 917. doi:10.1111/acem.14716                     19.  Qualtrics XM. Qualtrics XM: the leading experience manage-
              7.  Smida  T, Crowe R, Jarvis J, Ratcliff  T, Goebel M. Retrospec-  ment software. Qualtrics XM. Accessed August 30, 2024. https://
                 tive comparison of upper and lower extremity intraosseous ac-  www.qualtrics.com/
                 cess during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation. Prehosp   20.  Rivard MK, Cash RE, Mercer CB, Chrzan K, Panchal AR. De-
                 Emerg Care. 2024; 28(6):779–786. doi:10.1080/10903127.2024.   mography of the national emergency medical services workforce:
                 2321285                                            a description of those providing patient care in the prehospital
              8.  Daya MR, Leroux BG, Dorian P, et al. Survival after intrave-  setting. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021;25(2):213–220. doi:10.1080/
                 nous versus intraosseous amiodarone, lidocaine, or placebo in   10903127.2020.1737282
                                                                                       ®
                 out-of-hospital shock-refractory cardiac arrest. Circulation. 2020;   21.  Bound Tree  Medical. SAM  IO Needles. Bound Tree Medical.
                 141(3):188–198. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA. 119.042240  Accessed August 30, 2024. https://www.boundtree.com/iv-drug-
              9.  Lairet J, Bebarta V, Lairet K, et al. A comparison of proximal   delivery/intraosseous-io-devices/sam-io-needles/p/group005925
                 tibia, distal femur, and proximal humerus infusion rates using the   ?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjw28W2BhC7ARIsAPerrc
                 EZ-IO intraosseous device on the adult swine (Sus scrofa) model.   LlRnS5_xQalvyBTplyi3qFss8Qto9sVOybXgmd4r8MOAVS
                 Prehosp Emerg Care. 2013;17(2):280–284. doi:10.3109/109031  wM2cMAaAqzyEALw_wcB
                 27.2012.755582                                  22.  LiveActionSafety.  EZ-IO G3 Power Driver. LiveActionSafety.
              10.  Pasley J, Miller CHT, DuBose JJ, et al. Intraosseous infusion rates   Accessed August 30, 2024. https://www.liveactionsafety.com/ez-
                 under high pressure: a cadaveric comparison of anatomic sites.   io-g3-power-driver/
                 J Trauma Acute  Care  Surg. 2015;78(2):295–299. doi:10.1097/  23.  LiveActionSafety.  EZ-IO Adult  Needles.  LiveActionSafety. Ac-
                 TA.0000000000000516                                cessed August 30, 2024. https://www.liveactionsafety.com/ez-io-
              11.  Kay VC, Gehrz JA, Grady DW, et al. Application times, placement   adult-needle-25mm/
                 accuracy, and user ratings of commercially available manual and
                 battery-powered intraosseous catheters in a high bone density ca-  PMID: 41402243; DOI: 10.55460/ZBNM-T67Z
                 daveric swine model. Mil Med. 2024;189(9–10):1960–1967. doi:
                 10.1093/milmed/usad407
































                                                                        SAM IO versus EZ-IO: Insertion Time and Usability   |  39
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46