Page 37 - JSOM Winter 2025
P. 37

Methods                                            the reliability of our findings, bones with visible fractures or
                                                                 damage were discarded after visual inspection.
              The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration
              of Helsinki and approved by the Institutional Review Board   Our methodological approach adheres to ethical and regulatory
              of East Carolina University (UMCIRB 22-000255) for stud-  standards in animal research and provides comparable insights
              ies involving humans. Informed consent was obtained from all   into IO catheter placement techniques.  Both devices instruct
                                                                                               16
              subjects involved in the study.                    the user to either “Gently press needle through the skin until
                                                                 the tip touches the bone” (EZ-IO)  or “insert needle assembly
                                                                                           17
              Study Design and Setting                           through the skin and adipose tissue, touching the periosteum
              This prospective randomized comparative study was per-  before attempting IO insertion” (SAM IO).  The exposed por-
                                                                                                  18
              formed at several EMS stations, and EMS clinicians (Ad-  cine bone presented a suitable fidelity model since insertion
              vanced EMTs and paramedics) were recruited. A convenience   started with bone contact. Only the needle insertion time was
              sample was obtained from EMS clinicians who volunteered   measured to isolate each driver’s needle insertion times through
              to participate in a county EMS system comprised of one ur-  the bone (differentiating from the assembly times and stabi-
              ban fire-based agency, multiple rural contracted agencies, and   lization procedures, which could be skewed based on device
              one municipal third service agency that responds to 36,000   familiarity), and stabilization procedures were similar.
              requests for service annually.
                                                                 Outcome Measures
              Participants watched instructional videos produced by EZ-IO   Our primary outcome was the mean IO needle insertion time
              and SAM IO demonstrating device use, then were given   between EZ-IO and SAM IO.  Time was measured in sec-
              hands-on instruction and practice time with each driver and   onds (s) from the start of trigger actuation until the partic-
              needle size. Participants practiced insertions with both IO de-  ipant informed the researcher they were finished. All of the
              vices, in no particular order, based on their selection, of both   post- training attempts IO insertions (100%) were confirmed
              a simulated plastic bone task trainer and a porcine bone until   by saline flush, and visual inspection by the researcher were
              they self-reported proficiency. After completion of the practice   deemed successful. Success was determined by the participant
              session, each participant was randomized to either the EZ-IO   flushing 1–3mL of fluid through the inserted IO needle and vi-
              or SAM IO driver. Needle size selection was based on avail-  sual confirmation by the researcher that the saline flush passed
              ability and was not formally randomized. At the end of the   through the bone marrow. Secondary outcomes compared nee-
              session, participants were asked to complete a survey using   dle size (length), credential level, years of experience, sex, and
              Qualtrics to gather opinions regarding the use of each of the   prior experience with SAM IO with driver insertion times. A
              devices. The survey was constructed by EMS knowledge ex-  Qualtrics survey platform using a five-point Likert scale col-
              perts, then field tested and revised before use.   lected participant feedback data on both devices. 19

              Survey Design                                      Statistical Analysis
              The researchers anticipated that most, if not all, of the partic-  Data was analyzed with IBM SPSS 28 (IBM Corp, Armonk,
              ipants currently used the EZ-IO exclusively. However, some   NY) using a linear mixed-effects model and a 2×3 factorial
              may have had some training experience with the SAM IO.   ANOVA with a Bonferroni correction for pairwise compar-
              Questions were developed to determine user viewpoints for   isons to examine the effects of the device types EZ-IO and
              either device, but they were mainly used to compare the SAM   SAM IO on needle insertion times. Age, experience, and prior
              IO to the most used EZ-IO. The eight-question survey was de-  use were also analyzed as contributing factors represented by
              veloped by a group of experienced EMS clinicians, including   frequency and descriptive statistics; the frequency of responses
              board-certified EMS physicians. In a pilot trial, six paramed-  represented survey results.
              ics provided feedback, interpretation of questions, and revi-
              sion. The  study  purposefully  did  not  compare  the  assembly
              time and flow rates since the 15mm, 25mm, and 45mm needle   Results
              length and diameter specifications were identical: 15 gauge   One hundred and fifteen EMS clinicians (103 paramedics and
              and 1.8mm.                                         12 Advanced EMTs) consented, participated in a comparison
                                                                 study, and completed the survey, with none declining to partic-
              Model Selection                                    ipate. Data was inspected by histogram and boxplot for nor-
              Using the principles of Refine, Reduce, or Reuse in animal re-  mality and distribution. Visualization of the data histogram
              search, this study investigated IO catheter placement and used   and a significant Levene’s test (P<.001) for equality of vari-
              fresh, commercially processed porcine humerus bones. Based   ances was significant, demonstrating that the data between
              on previous research, porcine bones were obtained from 70   groups was not homogeneous.
              to 90kg porcine specimens, indicating their bone density ap-
              proximates that of 20 to 39-year-old adult patients. 14,15  Our   The entire intent-to-treat cohort was analyzed with a lin-
              basis for choosing porcine humerus bones is their compara-  ear  mixed-effects model  sensitive  to  the  data distribution  to
              bility with transfusion rates and medication efficacy, offering   examine the effect of driver type on IO insertion time while
              higher-fidelity models than simulated training bones for com-  controlling for needle size, sex, age, years of experience, and
              parative analyses. The porcine bones were procured from a   credential level. A random intercept for subject ID was included
              licensed North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Spe-  to account for between-subject variability. The model revealed
              cial Services meat processing facility and were acquired fol-  a significant main effect of driver type, F  =9.8, P=.002. Es-
                                                                                                1, 107.0
              lowing state permit regulations. Upon harvesting, the bones   timated marginal means showed that the EZ-IO driver had a
              were promptly stored in a cooler on ice. The bone specimens   mean insertion time of 1.2s (95% CI 1.0–1.4), compared to the
              were brought to room temperature before study use. To ensure   SAM IO driver with a mean of 2.4s (95% CI 2.2–2.7).

                                                                        SAM IO versus EZ-IO: Insertion Time and Usability   |  35
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42