Page 38 - JSOM Summer 2025

Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of 16. Gnugnoli DM, Singh A, Shafer K. EMS field intubation. Updated
Defense, or the U.S. Government. PAO approved. July 31, 2023. In: StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing;
2025 Jan-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK538221/
17. Figlewicz MR, Constantino K, Mendez J, Uhaa N, Maddry JK,
Funding Schauer SG. Simulation-based assessment of the novel, disposable
Our study was supported by a grant (DS19EC01) from the i-view video laryngoscope by emergency medicine physicians.
Defense Health Program 6.7 Office. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2022;(Per 22-04/05/06):22–26.
18. Schauer SG, Long BJ, April MD, et al. A prospective, pragmatic
References non-inferiority study of emergency intubation success with the
1. Baek MS, Han M, Huh JW, Lim CM, Koh Y, Hong SB. Video la- single-use i-view versus standard reusable video laryngoscope.
ryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for first-attempt tracheal Transfusion. 2024;64 Suppl 2:S201–S209. doi:10.1111/trf.17790
intubation in the general ward. Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):83. 19. Mendez J, Escandon M, Tapia AD, et al. Development of the De-
doi:10.1186/s13613-018-0428-0 fense Registry for Emergency Airway Management (DREAM).
2. Lewis SR, Butler AR, Parker J, Cook TM, Schofield-Robinson Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021;(Pb 8-21-04/05/06):93-97.
OJ, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for 20. Schauer SG, Tapia AD, Hudson IL, et al. A mixed methods end-user
adult patients requiring tracheal intubation: a Cochrane System- assessment to determine the ideal supraglottic airway device for in-
atic Review. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(3):369–383. doi:10.1093/ clusion into the medic’s aid bag. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022;
bja/aex228 93(2S Suppl 1):S64-S70. doi:10.1097/ta.0000000000003596
3. Hu X, Jin Y, Li J, Xin J, Yang Z. Efficacy and safety of videola- 21. April MD, Arana A, Reynolds JC, et al. Peri-intubation cardiac
ryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in paediatric intubation: A arrest in the emergency department: A National Emergency Air-
meta-analysis of 27 randomized controlled trials. J Clin Anesth. way Registry (NEAR) study. Resuscitation. 2021;162:403–411.
2020;66:109968. doi:10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109968 doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.039
4. Brown CA 3rd, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video laryngoscopy 22. Hasegawa K, Shigemitsu K, Hagiwara Y, et al. Association between
compared to augmented direct laryngoscopy in adult emergency repeated intubation attempts and adverse events in emergency
department tracheal intubations: a national emergency airway departments: an analysis of a multicenter prospective observa-
registry (NEAR) study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(2):100–108. tional study. Ann Emerg Med. 2012;60(6):749–754.e2. doi:10.
doi:10.1111/acem.13851 1016/j.annemergmed.2012.04.005
5. Kaji AH, Shover C, Lee J, et al. Video versus direct and augmented 23. Driver BE, Prekker ME, Reardon RF, et al. Success and compli-
direct laryngoscopy in pediatric tracheal intubations. Acad Emerg cations of the ketamine-only intubation method in the emergency
Med. 2020;27(5):394–402. doi:10.1111/acem.13869 department. J Emerg Med. 2021;60(3):265–272. doi:10.1016/j.
6. April MD, Long B. Does the use of video laryngoscopy improve jemermed.2020.10.042
intubation outcomes? Ann Emerg Med. Mar 2018;71(3):e9-e11. 24. Schauer SG, JR DF, J LR, et al. A randomized cross-over study
doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.038 comparing surgical cricothyrotomy techniques by combat medics
7. April MD, Schauer SG, Brown Rd CA, et al. A 12-month descrip- using a synthetic cadaver model. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(4):
tive analysis of emergency intubations at Brooke Army Medical 651–656. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.062
Center: a National Emergency Airway Registry study. US Army 25. Nikolla DA, Carlson JN, Jimenez Stuart PM, et al. Comparing
Med Dep J. 2017;(3-17):98–104. postinduction hypoxemia between ramped and supine position
8. Schauer SG, April MD, Tannenbaum LI, et al. A comparison of endotracheal intubations with apneic oxygenation in the emer-
prehospital versus emergency department intubations in Iraq and gency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2022;29(3):317–325. doi:
Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med. 2019;19(2):87–90. doi:10.55460/ 10.1111/acem.14415
NRMI-FF0K 26. Levin NM, Fix ML, April MD, Arana AA, Brown CA 3rd. The
9. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Hill GJ, Arana AA, Roper JL, April MD. As- association of rocuronium dosing and first-attempt intubation
sociation of prehospital intubation with decreased survival among success in adult emergency department patients. CJEM. 2021;23
pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan. Am J Emerg (4):518–527. doi:10.1007/s43678-021-00119-6
Med. 2018;36(4):657–659. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.066 27. April MD, Arana A, Pallin DJ, et al. Emergency department in-
10. Schauer SG, April MD. A comparison of combat casualty out- tubation success with succinylcholine versus rocuronium: a na-
comes after prehospital versus military treatment facility airway tional emergency airway registry study. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;72
management. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2023;(Per 23-1/2/3): (6):645–653. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.042
92–96. 28. Schauer SG, Davis WT, Johnson MD, et al. A prospective assess-
11. Carius BM, Dodge PM, Fisher AD, Loos PE, Thompson D, ment of a novel, disposable video laryngoscope with physician as-
Schauer SG. An analysis of prehospital trauma registry after- sistant trainees using a synthetic cadaver model. Mil Med. 2022;
action reviews in Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med. 2021;21(2):49– 187(5–6):e572–e576. doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa537
53. doi:10.55460/1EOJ-0HRV 29. Schauer SG, Mendez J, Uhaa N, Hudson IL, Weymouth WL. A
12. Carius BM, Dodge PM, Hudson IL, et al. An analysis of pre- prospective, feasibility assessment of a novel, disposable video la-
hospital trauma registry: after-action reviews on airway inter- ryngoscope with Special Operations medical personnel in a mobile
ventions in Afghanistan. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021;(PB helicopter simulation setting. J Spec Oper Med. 2021;21(4):26–
8-21-04/05/06):32–37. 29. doi:10.55460/581V-SWP2
13. Fisher AD, April MD, Naylor JF, Kotwal RS, Schauer SG. The 30. Uhaa N, Jeschke EA, Gwynne AM, et al. An assessment of combat
battalion aid station-the forgotten frontier of the Army Health medic supraglottic airway device design needs using a qualitative
System during the global war on terrorism. Mil Med. 2023;188 methods approach: a preliminary analysis. Med J (Ft Sam Houst
(5–6):e1240–e1245. doi:10.1093/milmed/usab401 Tex). 2021;(PB 8-21-07/08/09):90–96.
14. Castaneda P, Kim TS, Beck JD, et al. Special Operations medics 31. Schauer SG, Knight RM, Maddry JK, et al. The risks of prolonged
test the novel iview video laryngoscope: a prospective, random- casualty care for conventional forces in large-scale combat opera-
ized, crossover trial. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2021;(PB 8-21- tions. Task and Purpose. 2023. Accessed March 25, 2024. https:/
04/05/06):44–51. PMID: 34251664 /taskandpurpose.com/opinion/risks-prolonged-casualty-care-
15. Jones JH, Murphy MP, Dickson RL, Somerville GG, Brizendine large-scale-combat-operations/
EJ. Emergency physician-verified out-of-hospital intubation: miss
rates by paramedics. Acad Emerg Med. 2004;11(6):707–709. doi: PMID: 40548927; DOI: 10.55460/00CQ-O0RI
10.1197/j.aem.2003.12.026.

36 | JSOM Volume 25, Edition 2 / Summer 2025