Page 59 - JSOM Fall 2023
P. 59

15.  Zink BJ, Stern SA, McBeth BD, Wang X, Mertz M. Effects of eth-
                 anol on limited resuscitation in a model of traumatic brain injury
                 and hemorrhagic shock. J Neurosurg. 2006;105(6):884–893.
              16.  Stern SA, Kowalenko T, Younger J, Wang X, Dronen SC. Compar-
                 ison of the effects of bolus vs. slow infusion of 7.5% NaCl/6%
                 dextran-70 in a model of near-lethal uncontrolled hemorrhage.
                 Shock. 2000;14(6):616–622.
              17.  Velez DR. The history of hemorrhagic shock and damage control
                 resuscitation. Am Surg. 2022;88(11):2656–2659.
              18.  Schreiber MA, Meier EN, Tisherman SA, et al; ROC Investiga-
                 tors. A controlled resuscitation strategy is feasible and safe in hy-
                 potensive trauma  patients: results of a prospective  randomized
                 pilot trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(4):687–695.
              19.  Safiejko K, Smereka J, Filipiak KJ, et al. Effectiveness and safety of
                 hypotension fluid resuscitation in traumatic hemorrhagic shock:
                 a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled
                 trials. Cardiol J. 2022;29(3):463–471.
              20.  Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed
                 fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso
                 injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(17):1105–1109.
              21.  Deaton TG, Auten JD, Betzold R, et al. Fluid resuscitation in Tac-
                 tical Combat Casualty Care; TCCC Guidelines Change 21-01. 4
                 November 2021. J Spec Oper Med. 2021;21(4):126–137.
              22.  Varsos GV, Budohoski KP, Kolias AG, et al. Relationship of vas-
                 cular wall tension and autoregulation following traumatic brain
                 injury. Neurocrit Care. 2014;21(2):266–274.
              23.  Stadlbauer KH, Wagner-Berger HG, Raedler C, et al. Vasopressin,
                 but not fluid resuscitation, enhances survival in a liver trauma
                 model with uncontrolled and otherwise lethal hemorrhagic shock
                 in pigs. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(3):699–704.
              24.  Cossu AP, Mura P, De Giudici LM, et al. Vasopressin in hemor-
                 rhagic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis of random-
                 ized animal trials. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:421291.
              25.  Sims CA, Holena D, Kim P, et al.  Effect of low-dose supple-
                 mentation of arginine vasopressin on need for blood product
                 transfusions in patients with trauma and hemorrhagic shock: a
                 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2019;154(11):994–1003.
              26.  Gerhardt RT, Strandenes G, Cap AP; THOR Network and Rem-
                 TORN Study Groups. Remote damage control resuscitation and
                 the Solstrand Conference: defining the need, the language, and a
                 way forward. Transfusion. 2013;53 Suppl 1:9S–16S.
              27.  Esposito TJ, Maier RV, Rivara FP, et al. The impact of variation
                 in trauma care times: urban versus rural. Prehosp Disaster Med.
                 1995;10(3):161–166.

              PMID: 37224392; DOI: 10.55460/MB9O-LXOB


































                                                             IV Infusion of a DCR Cocktail Decreases Blood Loss in a Pig Model  |  57
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64