Page 31 - JSOM Spring 2023

Funding 17. Johnson SA, Lauby RS, Fisher AD, et al. An analysis of conflicts
We received no funding for this study. across Role 1 guidelines. Mil Med. 2022;187(3–4):e263–e274.
18. Adams BD, Cuniowski PA, Muck A, De Lorenzo RA. Registry
of emergency airways arriving at combat hospitals. J Trauma.
Ethics 2008;64(6):1548–1554.
The USAISR regulatory office reviewed protocol H-20-015nh 19. Calkins MD, Robinson TD. Combat trauma airway manage-
and determined it was exempt from Institutional Review ment: endotracheal intubation versus laryngeal mask airway ver-
Board oversight. We obtained only de-identified data. sus combitube use by Navy SEAL and Reconnaissance combat
corpsmen. J Trauma. 1999;46(5):927–932.
20. Pugh HE, LeClerc S, Mclennan J. A review of pre-admission ad-
Acknowledgments vanced airway management in combat casualties, Helmand Prov-
The authors acknowledge the Department of Defense Trauma ince 2013. J R Army Med Corps. 2015;161(2):121–126.
Registry (DODTR) for providing the data for this study. 21. Mabry RL, Frankfurt A. An analysis of battlefield cricothyrotomy
in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Spec Oper Med. 2012;12(1):17–23.
Disclosures 22. Mabry RL, Cuniowski P, Frankfurt A, Adams BD. Advanced air-
way management in combat casualties by medics at the point of
None. injury: a sub-group analysis of the reach study. J Spec Oper Med.
2011;11(2):16–19.
Disclaimer 23. Keller MW, Han PP, Galarneau MR, Brigger MT. Airway man-
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and agement in severe combat maxillofacial trauma. Otolaryngol
Head Neck Surg. 2015;153(4):532–537.
do not reflect the official policy or position of the US Army 24. Mulcaster JT, Mills J, Hung OR, et al. Laryngoscopic intubation:
Medical Department, Department of the Army, Department of learning and performance. Anesthesiology. 2003;98(1):23–27.
Defense, or the US Government. 25. Garza AG, Gratton MC, Coontz D, et al. Effect of paramedic ex-
perience on orotracheal intubation success rates. J Emerg Med.
References 2003;25(3):251–256.
1. Eastridge BJ, Mabry RL, Seguin P, et al. Death on the battlefield 26. Cook TM, Woodall N, Harper J, Benger J. Fourth National Audit
(2001–2011): implications for the future of combat casualty care Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK:
[published correction appears in J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College
Feb;74(2):706. Kotwal, Russell S [corrected to Kotwal, Russ S]]. of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 2: inten-
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437. sive care and emergency departments. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(5):
2. Mazuchowski EL, Kotwal RS, Janak JC, et al. Mortality review 632–642.
of US Special Operations Command battle-injured fatalities. J 27. De Lorenzo RA. Medic for the millennium: the U.S. Army 91W
Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020;88(5):686–695. health care specialist. Mil Med. 2001;166(8):685–688.
3. Schauer SG, April MD, Fairley R, et al. A comparison of the iGel 28. Mabry RL, De Lorenzo RA. Sharpening the edge: paramedic
versus cricothyrotomy by combat medics using a synthetic ca- training for flight medics. US Army Med Dep J. 2011;92–100.
daver model: A randomized, controlled pilot study. J Spec Oper 29. Blackburn MB, Wang SC, Ross BE, et al. Anatomic accuracy of
Med. 2020;20(4):68–72. airway training manikins compared with humans. Anaesthesia.
4. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Chow AL, et al. Survival of casualties un- 2021;76(3):366–372.
dergoing prehospital supraglottic airway placement versus crico- 30. April MD, Long B. Does the use of video laryngoscopy improve
thyrotomy. J Spec Oper Med. 2019;19(2):91–94. intubation outcomes? Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(3):e9–e11.
5. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Dion G, et al. An analysis of airway inter- 31. Kaji AH, Shover C, Lee J, et al. Video versus direct and augmented
ventions in the setting of smoke inhalation injury on the battle- direct laryngoscopy in pediatric tracheal Intubations. Acad Emerg
field. Mil Med. 2021;186(5-6):e474–e479. Med. 2020;27(5):394–402.
6. Kauvar DS, Dubick MA, Walters TJ, Kragh JF Jr. Systematic 32. Schauer SG, Davis WT, Johnson MD, et al. A prospective assess-
review of prehospital tourniquet use in civilian limb trauma. J ment of a novel, disposable video laryngoscope with physician as-
Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(5):819–825. sistant trainees using a synthetic cadaver model. Mil Med. 2022;
7. Shackelford SA, Del Junco DJ, Powell-Dunford N, et al. Associ- 187(5–6):e572–e576.
ation of prehospital blood product transfusion during medical 33. Brown CA 3rd, Kaji AH, Fantegrossi A, et al. Video laryngoscopy
evacuation of combat casualties in Afghanistan with acute and compared to augmented direct laryngoscopy in adult emergency
30-day survival. JAMA. 2017;318(16):1581–1591. department tracheal intubations: A National Emergency Airway
8. Schauer SG, April MD, Fisher AD, et al. Junctional tourniquet Registry (NEAR) study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(2):100–108.
use during combat operations in Afghanistan: The prehospital 34. Hinkelbein J, Iovino I, De Robertis E, Kranke P. Outcomes in
trauma registry experience. J Spec Oper Med. 2018;18(2):71–74. video laryngoscopy studies from 2007 to 2017: systematic review
9. Manley JD, Mitchell BJ, DuBose JJ, Rasmussen TE. A modern and analysis of primary and secondary endpoints for a core set
case series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the of outcomes in video laryngoscopy research. BMC Anesthesiol.
aorta (REBOA) in an out-of-hospital, combat casualty care set- 2019;19(1):47.
ting. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(1):1–8. 35. April MD, Arana A, Pallin DJ, et al. Emergency department in-
10. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Fisher AD, et al. An analysis of 13 years of tubation success with succinylcholine versus rocuronium: A Na-
prehospital combat casualty care: Implications for maintaining a tional Emergency Airway Registry Study. Ann Emerg Med. 2018;
ready medical force. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(3):370–379. 72(6):645–653.
11. Glenn MA, Martin KD, Monzon D, et al. Implementation of a com- 36. April MD, Arana A, Reynolds JC, et al. Peri-intubation cardiac ar-
bat casualty trauma registry. J Trauma Nurs. 2008;15(4):181–184 rest in the emergency department: A National Emergency Airway
12. O’Connell KM, Littleton-Kearney MT, Bridges E, Bibb SC. Eval- Registry (NEAR) study. Resuscitation. 2021;162:403–411.
uating the Joint Theater Trauma Registry as a data source to 37. April MD, Arana A, Schauer SG, et al. Ketamine versus etomidate
benchmark casualty care. Mil Med. 2012;177(5):546–552. and peri-intubation hypotension: A National Emergency Airway
13. Wang X. Firth logistic regression for rare variant association tests. Registry Study. Acad Emerg Med. 2020;27(11):1106–1115.
Front Genet. 2014;5:187. 38. US Army Medical and Research Command. Congressionally di-
14. Firth D. Bias reduction of maximum likelihood estimates. Bio- rected medical research programs: 2020 annual report. https://
metrika. 1993;80(1):27–38. cdmrp.army.mil/pubs/annreports/2020annrep/2020annreport.
15. Statista. Number of fatalities among Western coalition soldiers pdf, last accessed 09 May 2021. Accessed 20 July 2022.
involved in the execution of Operation Enduring Freedom from 39. Schauer SG, April MD, Naylor JF, et al. A descriptive analysis of
2001 to 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/262894/western data from the Department of Defense Joint Trauma System Prehos-
-coalition-soldiers-killed-in-afghanistan/. Accessed 20 July 2022. pital Trauma Registry. US Army Med Dep J. 2017;(3–17):92–97.
16. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Fisher AD, et al. An analysis of 13 years of
prehospital combat casualty care: Implications for maintaining a
ready medical force. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2022;26(3):370–379.

Prehospital Combat Airway Interventions | 29