Page 92 - 2022 Spring JSOM
P. 92

the Minnie Ties can be trimmed and excess tie cut off, using   methods require additional instruments, such as wire drivers,
          any normal pair of scissors, or cutting implement (Figure 17).   wire cutters, screw drivers, screws, wires, arch bars, etc.
          Because the clasp is one way, the Minnie Ties can be trimmed
          against the clasp.                                 One of the disadvantages of the Minnie Tie technique is the
                                                             fact that the patient needs a relatively full complement  of
          FIGURE 16  (LEFT) Technique of tightening; the clasp is stabilized   dentition. Patients need solid interproximal contacts between
          with a secondary instrument and a hemostat or wire driver used to
          tightened. Ensure the tie is pulled directly out from the clasp and not   teeth in order for this technique to be used successfully. Pa-
          deviating up or down, or side to side, to ensure maximal results.  tients with multiple missing teeth or advanced periodontal
                                                             disease with tooth mobility may not be good candidates for
          FIGURE 17  (RIGHT) Minnie Ties placed on a patient, tightened, and
          trimmed.                                           this technique. However, there are some various applications
                                                             of Minnie Ties that can overcome some of these limitations.
                                                             Minnie Tie cannot be used on edentulous patients (no teeth) or
                                                             patients with no opposing teeth (missing all the top or bottom
                                                             teeth). Minnie Ties are only FDA approved to be left in place
                                                             for 3 weeks. However, many providers have used them for
                                                             longer in an “off-label” fashion without complications, and
                                                             with no appreciable loosening of the ties (we include for your
                                                             information but do not recommend using them off-label).
                                                             Minnie Ties may not be a suitable technique for a comminuted
          As mentioned above, Minnie Ties can be easily cut with almost   mandible fracture in which the maxilla or mandible is frac-
          any scissor type. The authors recommend that anytime a pa-  tured into multiple pieces, though more experienced provider
          tient is placed into MMF (by any method), a pair of scissors   can and do treat these types of fractures using Minnie Ties.
          (or wire cutters if arch bars are used) are placed on a cord   One noted problem is that they tend to floss between contacts
          around the patients neck to wear like a necklace in the event   when tightened, particularly if the teeth are mobile or the in-
          that they require immediate removal. In the event that some-  terdental contacts are not tight. This can be overcome by using
          thing needs to be checked in the mouth or the airway accessed,   more ties and using the larger-diameter ties. 16
          the ties can be cut, the intervention or examination performed,
          and then a new set reapplied. In the patient who is intubated   Another pertinent consideration is the airway. In patients who
          orally, the tube being between the teeth precludes any type of   are unstable or have the potential to become quickly decom-
          MMF. Therefore, providers can consider a nasal intubation, a   pensated, we recommend caution with using the technique.
          submental intubation, or a surgical airway, but the consider-  On a patient who is otherwise stable, awake, oriented, and
          ations for each of those are beyond the scope of this article.   responsive, this is a safe technique, as well as on a patient with
          These more complex situations are beyond the scope of the ar-  a secured airway. An oral intubation would preclude this tech-
          ticle, but worth discussing with a CMF surgeon in more detail   nique since the tube would be between the teeth, but if a nasal
          for any interested parties.                        tube, surgical airway, or submental intubation is present, then
                                                             this technique works on a secured airway. We recommend
                                                             on any patient to keep a set of scissors or wire cutters on a
          Discussion                                         necklace or loop of material around the patient’s neck so they
          The use of this technique is FDA approved and indicated for   can be quickly released if needed. Releasing the Minnie Ties is
          establishment of MMF. It is novel in the sense that it has not   easily accomplished by simply cutting them and should take
          been brought to the military context or battlefield. It is used   15–30 seconds even by first-time users.
          routinely in the authors’ clinical military hospital–based prac-
          tice and is approved and available to order within the govern-  Summary
          ment ordering system as it has undergone the application and
          approval process by the government.                Fractures of the MMF complex are a common injury on the
                                                             modern battlefield. These fractures can be challenging as there
          One of the advantages of Minnie Ties over traditional methods   is often limited lighting, poor facilities, difficulty maintaining
          of MMF is operator safety. The application of arch bars and   sterility, and little or no radiology support. Additionally, when
          ivy loops, as discussed above, places the operator at risk for   treating local national patients, evacuation to higher levels of
          sharp injuries as multiple wires are passed between the teeth,   care may not be available, necessitating definitive care. Mili-
          causing bleeding, and between the arches. The introducer of   tary providers, particularly those assigned to SOF, often treat
          the Minnie Tie is blunt, making them much safer than these   patients in remote environments without the benefits of an
          techniques. Patient safety is a third advantage, as there is less   operating room, sterilization, specialist consults, or specialized
          trauma to the gingival tissues and there is no risk of damaging   equipment. Having access to a technique for treating maxillo-
          roots as there is with the application of MMF screws or hybrid   mandibular fractures that has minimal equipment requirements,
          arch bars. A third advantage is ease of application. Erich arch   does not require advanced knowledge of the anatomy of the fa-
          bars and ivy loops are technique sensitive and time-consuming,   cial skeleton, and is relatively easy to perform is ideal to the SOF
          while Minnie Ties can be applied quickly and easily. One small   provider. We believe the Minnie Tie fixation technique would be
          case series showed an average placement time of 12–15 min-  a valuable technique to add to the arsenal of any SOF provider.
          utes.  A detailed knowledge of the underlying anatomy of the
              16
          maxillomandibular complex, while essential to the placement   Disclaimer
          of MMF screws and bone supported arch bars, is not required.   The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do
          Fourth, Minnie Ties are small and lightweight and would be   not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Army,
          an ideal addition to a simple dental trauma kit, while all other   Department of Defense, or the US Government.


          90  |  JSOM   Volume 22, Edition 1 / Sping 2022
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97