Page 87 - 2022 Spring JSOM
P. 87

tube during the Tactical Field Care and Enroute Care phases   for performing field fasciotomies should review their available
              of Tactical Combat Casualty Care. Risk of infection in this   equipment  and  consider  incorporating  these  alternative  de-
              setting is best mitigated by peri-procedural antibiotics, skin   vices into a cadaver-based procedural training program.
              preparation (i.e., Betadine), decontamination of instruments,
              and post-procedural coverage of the sites with sterile dressings.  Acknowledgments
                                                                 The authors would like to acknowledge the men and women
              Future Directions
              Selective fasciotomy has been proffered to minimize mor-  who donate their remains to support medical research and
              bidity associated with fasciotomy incisions. In a study of 51   procedural development. Without their precious gift, untimely
              patients with leg ACS, 80% were managed with selective de-  death and needless suffering would prevail. We would also like
              compression of only compartments with elevated compart-  to thank the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cen-
              mental pressures. The authors reported only one patient taken   ter Willed Body Program and staff for their tireless efforts to
              back for additional compartment release and noted that every   enhance the medical arts beyond walls and borders. We would
              patient required anterior compartment release and that two-   additionally like to extend our gratitude to Centre Labora-
              compartment release was adequate in 67% of patients.  Al-  tory Director Jennifer Achay and Lab Technician Jenna Dixon
                                                         27
              though these data are intriguing, they will not be applicable to   for their work enabling this study. Lastly, we would like to
              field fasciotomy until individual compartment pressures can   gratefully acknowledge David Baker for his continued work
              be measured reliably, which may be possible with increased   clarifying medicine with illustrative excellence.
              experience and training using either the C2Dx, Compass, or
              other pressure transducers.                        Author Contributions
                                                                 ED and CH conceived of the manuscript concept. ED per-
              Limitations                                        formed research. ED, CH, and SB performed data collection.
              This was a proof-of-concept  study to evaluate  the perfor-  ED and CH drafted the manuscript. All authors were involved
              mance of field fasciotomy with alternative instruments. The   in revisions and approved the final manuscript.
              fresh cadaver models used had appropriate anatomy for the
              fasciotomies performed; however, none of the models had   Disclaimer
              tense  compartments  consistent  with  ACS.  It  is  our  opinion   The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do
              that the bulging compartments seen in ACS make the proce-  not reflect the official policy or position of Brooke Army Med-
              dure easier and provide visual evidence that decompression   ical Center, the U.S. Army Medical Department, the U.S. Army
              has been accomplished. It may be possible to simulate elevated   Office of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army,
              compartment pressure in this cadaver model, thereby adding   the Department of the Air Force and Department of Defense,
              additional realism to procedural training and allowing for   or the U.S. Government.
              simulated compartment pressure monitoring. We cannot draw
              conclusions from the single superficial peroneal nerve injury   Financial Disclosures
              because this proof-of-concept study was not adequately pow-  The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
              ered to compare the techniques. A surgeon performed the fas-
              ciotomies, so we cannot speculate on how the devices would   References
              perform in the hands of medics. However, these data and sub-  1.  Owens BD, Kragh JF Jr, Macaitis J, Svoboda SJ, Wenke JC. Char-
                                                                   acterization of extremity wounds in Operation Iraqi Freedom and
              jective feedback can be used to inform future investigations us-  Operation Enduring Freedom.  J Orthop Trauma. 2007;21(4):
              ing cadaver models and the design or revision of devices better   254–257.
              suited for field fasciotomy.                       2.  Schmidt AH. Acute compartment syndrome.  Injury. 2017;48
                                                                   (Suppl 1):S22–S25.
              Scalpels are Class 1 devices, which are required to meet good   3.  Gordon WT, Talbot M, Shero JC, et al. Acute extremity com-
              manufacturing processes (GMPs) but are exempt from FDA   partment syndrome and the role of fasciotomy in extremity war
                                                                   wounds. Mil Med. 2018;183(suppl_2):108–111.
              501(k) review.  The PenBlade is registered as a Class 1 device   4.  Walters T, Powell D, Penny A, et al. Joint Trauma System Clini-
                         28
              with the FDA (registration number 3010780223) with indi-  cal Practice Guideline (JTS CPG): Crush Syndrome - Prolonged
              cations for use similar to those for a traditional scalpel. The   Field Care (CPG ID: 58). Published 28 December 2016. https://
              use of the PenBlade in a retracted configuration for this study   jts.amedd.army.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/Crush_Syndrome_PFC_28_
              is not an off-label use because the blade could also be used   Dec_2016_ID58.pdf. Accessed 13 December 2020.
              to complete the fasciotomy in an open configuration. None   5.  Headquarters Department of the Army. STP 31-18D34-SM-TG.
              of the hooks are medical devices, but given the similarity of   Soldier’s Manual and Trainer’s Guide. MOS 18D. Special Forces
                                                                   Medical Sergeant Skill Levels 3 and 4. October 2003.  https://
              a cutting edge, they would likely also fall under exemptions   armypubs.army.mil/epubs/DR_pubs/DR_c/pdf/web/stp31
              similar to those of scalpels. No information is readily available   _18d34.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2021.
              regarding GMP status on the hook devices.          6.  Secretary of the Air Force. Air Force Instruction 10-3502. Volume 1.
                                                                   Pararescue and Combat Rescue Officer Training. 30 March 2017.
                                                                   https://static.e-publishing.af.mil/production/1/af_a3/publication
              Conclusion                                           /afi10-3502v1/afi10-3502v1.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2021.
                                                                 7.  Feliciano D. The management of extremity  compartment  syn-
              In  contested environments,  patients with  ACS may  require   drome. In: Cameron JL, ed.  Current Surgical Therapy. 9th ed.
              four-compartment fasciotomy prior to evacuation to a surgical   Philadelphia, FL: Mosby Elsevier; 2008.
              team. This life- and limb-saving procedure can be performed   8.  Fazal TM, Rasmussen T, Nelson P, Carlton PK. How long can
              with available alternative equipment, such as rescue hooks or   the U.S. military’s Golden Hour last? 8 October 2018. https://war
              the PenBlade scalpel. Hook-type devices require longer skin in-  ontherocks.com/2018/10/how-long-can-the-u-s-militarys-golden
                                                                   -hour-last/. Accessed 26 March 2021.
              cisions and a pull technique compared with scissors or the No.   9.  McQueen MM, Duckworth AD, Aitken SA, Sharma RA, Court-
              10  PenBlade, which can be used in a push technique through   Brown CM. Predictors of compartment syndrome after tibial frac-
              a smaller incision. Medical directors and medics responsible   ture. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(10):451–455.


                                                                   Alternative Equipment for Austere Fasciotomy in the Field  |  85
   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92