Page 125 - JSOM Spring 2020

Services for their generosity and advice over the years, includ- 7. Clark L, Ventres W. Qualitative methods in community-based par-
ing training on TRIAGE and SETS. Finally, they thank USAF ticipatory research: coming of age. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(1):
Col (Ret) Anthony Tvaryanas for his thoughtful feedback on 3–4.
the project. 8. D’Alonzo KT. Getting started in CBPR—lessons in building com-
munity partnerships for new researchers. Nurs Inq. 2010;17(4):
282–288.
Disclaimer 9. Muhammad M, Wallerstein N, Sussman AL, et al. Reflections
The opinions or assertions contained herein are not to be con- on researcher identity and power: the impact of positionality on
strued as official or as reflecting the views of the Uniformed community based participatory research (CBPR) processes and
Services University, the US Special Operations Command or outcomes. Crit Sociol (Eugene). 2015;41:1045–1063.
the Department of Defense. 10. Star SL, Griesemer JR. Institutional ecology, “translations” and
boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkley’s Mu-
seum of Vertebrate Zoology. Soc Stud Sci. 1989;19:387–420.
Disclosure 11. Akkerman SF, Bakker A. Boundary crossing and boundary ob-
The authors have indicated they have no financial relation- jects. Rev Educ Res. 2011;18(2):132–169.
ships relevant to this article to disclose. 12. Keshet Y, Ben-Arye E, Schiff E. The use of boundary objects to
enhance interprofessional collaboration: integrating complemen-
References tary medicine in a hospital setting. Sociol Health Illn. 2013;35(5):
1. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United 666–681.
States of America. 2018. https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Docu- 13. Keshet Y, Popper-Giveon A. Integrative health care in Israel and
ments/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf traditional Arab herbal medicine: when health care interfaces with
2. Tvaryanas A, Brown L, Miller NL. Managing the human weapon culture and politics. Med Anthropol Q. 2013;27(3):368–384.
system: a vision for an Air Force human performance doctrine. Air 14. Brand FS, Jax K. Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resil-
Space Power J. 2009:24–41. ience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecol Soc.
3. Deuster PA, O’Connor FG, Henry KA, et al. Human performance 2007;12(1):article 23.
optimization: an evolving charge to the Department of Defense. 15. Beebe J. Rapid Qualitative Inquiry: a Field Guide to Team-Based
Mil Med. 2007;172(11):1133–1137. Assessment. 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: The Rowman & Littlefield
4. Lunasco T, Chamberlin R, Deuster P. Human performance optimi- Publishing Group, Inc.; 2014.
zation: an operational and Operator-centric approach. J Spec Oper 16. Mattie P, Spivock M, Théoret D. Essential task identification for
Med. 2019;19(3):101–106. military occupations using the TRIAGE technique In: Aiken AB,
5. The Joint Staff. Force Readiness Reporting. Washington, DC: Joint Bélander AH, eds. Beyond the Line, Miliatry and Veteran Health
Staff; 2011:54. Research. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University
6. Belone L, Lucero JE, Duran B, et al. Community-based participa- Press; 2013.
tory research conceptual model: community partner consultation 17. Blacklock RE, Reilly TJ, Spivock M, et al. Standard establish-
and face validity. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(1):117–135. ment through scenarios (SETS): a new technique for occupational
fitness standards. Work. 2015;52(2):375–383.

Optimizing SOF Talents and Mission Capabilities | 119