Page 102 - JSOM Spring 2018
P. 102

NOTE: If you are not trained to perform gastric decompres-  not available, clean the area with 70% isopropyl alcohol
          sion, then transport immediately to the nearest veterinary   or other medical-grade skin antiseptic agent, if available.
          clinic.                                            3.  Insert a large bore (e.g.,10–16 gauge × 3.25 inches) over-the-
                                                               needle catheter at the location chosen. Insert the catheter at
          Gastric Decompression                                a 90° angle (perpendicular) to the body wall. Alternatively,
          Of importance, gastric decompression is a technique to tran-  since the stomach naturally resides in the cranial abdomen
          siently treat GDV; it does not cure or definitively fix the patho-  under the last three ribs, consider inserting the catheter at
          logic condition. Definitive care involves surgical intervention   a slight angle (e.g., 50°–60°) cranial (i.e., toward the head);
          to reposition (derotate) the stomach, followed by affixing the   this allows the catheter to trace the pathway of the stomach
          stomach to the internal abdominal wall (gastropexy). Gas-  as it deflates.
          tric decompression allows restoration of venous return to the   4.  Confirm successful gastric trocarization via the sound of
          heart, increased cardiac output, and return of effective ventila-  hissing and presence of foul-smelling gas; additionally, fluid
          tion. Ideally, gastric decompression is performed after cardio-  may begin to flow (or spurt) out of the needle.
          vascular resuscitation with IV/IO fluid therapy. Restoration of   5.  Seat the catheter fully into the gastric lumen by sliding
          circulation after gastric decompression may result in reperfu-  (feeding) the catheter off the stylet into the stomach until
          sion injury that may initially lead to further cardiovascular   the catheter hub is flush with the body wall. If possible,
          compromise.  The ability to initiate fluid resuscitation is not   secure the stylet in a sterile and safe location in case it is
                    6
          always available in the field. However, it is the author’s opin-  needed for subsequent GNDC.
          ion and recommendation, based on clinical experience, that   6.  While maintaining positive control of the catheter hub
          gastric decompression is still warranted in this situation.  against the body wall, compress both sides of the abdomen
                                                               together (i.e., like an accordion); this facilitates keeping the
          Methods for gastric decompression include orogastric (OG)   catheter inside the gastric lumen as the stomach deflates,
          intubation (a.k.a., stomach tube) and GNDC. OG intubation   and it forces gas to escape.
          is not recommendedfor field or prehospital use for the follow-  7.  Remove the catheter at the same angle it was inserted once

          ing reasons : (1) it is a painful procedure requiring appropriate   no further gas is heard escaping from the catheter and the
                   5
          and effective sedation and analgesia; (2) it is a technical and   abdomen appears significantly less distended.
          perishable skill for those not familiar with or who do not rou-  8.  Repeat GNDC if clinical signs return. Inform the receiving
          tinely perform OG intubations in canines; (3) it carries a risk   facility of the number of attempts (successful or not) and
          for aspiration pneumonitis/pneumonia; and (4) it comes with   location of GNDC.
          the added risk of causing esophageal and/or gastric perfora-
          tion.  In addition, inability to pass an OG tube is reported to   NOTE: Do not leave the catheter in place in hope of pro-
              8
          occur in approximately 25% of cases. 8             viding a continual pathway for gas to escape. Doing so
                                                             provides a false sense of assurance that gas is not accumu-
          GNDC  (a.k.a., gastric  trocarization)  is considered  a reason-  lating in the stomach. Due to its short length, the catheter

          able technique for field and prehospital gastric decompression.   very quickly slides out of the deflated stomach; the tip sits
          As compared with OG intubation, GNDC is quicker to per-  only within the abdominal cavity. Additionally, due to elas-
          form, less painful, and does not require sedation or analgesia.   tic motion of the canine skin, the catheter easily becomes
          The latter advantage makes GNDC a better option for a he-  kinked and occluded at the insertion site into the body wall.
          modynamically unstable patient. In a veterinary hospital set-  Some choose to leave the catheter in place, however, solely
          ting, GNDC demonstrated a higher success rate for achieving   for the purpose of marking the number and location of per-
          gastric decompression than OG intubation.  The disadvantage   formed GNDCs.
                                           8
          of GNDC is the small bore size of the catheter, which may pre-
          clude rapid or complete evacuation of gas. As compared with   Risks associated with GNDC are minimal. If GNDC is per-
          OG intubation, GNDC does not afford the ability to perform   formed in the absence of a GDV (e.g., due to an inaccurate field
          gastric lavage and completely evacuate all stomach contents.   diagnosis), the likelihood of causing any significant damage to
          However, gastric lavage is not a recommended field procedure,   other internal organs or structures is low. Inadvertent splenic
          because of its inherent risks (e.g., aspiration) and need for gen-  puncture may cause intraabdominal hemorrhage, whereas
          eral anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Overall, GNDC   gastrointestinal puncture may cause leakage of contents into
          remains the recommended technique for prehospital gastric   the abdomen. In the author’s experience and as reported in the
          decompression. GNDC is a rather simple procedure easily   literature,  however, these events typically do not present any
                                                                     8
          learned by anyone. Despite its simplicity, GNDC does carry   major complications or warrant any specific treatment. Even
          some inherent risks; therefore, only those properly trained in   if major complications develop, the OpK9 is undergoing an
          the procedure should perform it. The following is a recom-  open exploratory laparotomy to correct the GDV, at which
          mended protocol GNDC :                             time, any complication may be dealt with appropriately. In
                             5
                                                             light of any potential complications  that may develop from
          1.  Locate area to perform GNDC: Identify the most distended   GNDC, always inform the receiving facility of any attempts to
            portion within the right or left abdominal flank region (i.e.,   perform a GNDC, successful or not.
            area immediately caudal to the last rib). If no area appears
            grossly distended, or both sides appear equally distended,   Continuous Percutaneous Decompressive Gastrostomy
            then percuss each side to identify the area that has the great-  Catheter for Prolonged Field Care
            est tympany (loudest hyperresonant “ping”). This identifies   Percutaneous placement of a 5F locking pigtail catheter into
            where the gas-filled stomach is closest to the body wall.  the stomach for use as a gastrotomy catheter (G-catheter)
          2.  Clip a 1- to 2-inch square area of hair and clean the overly-  was reported as a safe, minimally invasive, well-tolerated,
            ing skin of the location identified in step 1. If clippers are   and effective method for sustained gastric decompression in


          96  |  JSOM   Volume 18, Edition 1/Spring 2018
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107