Page 58 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2014
P. 58

Evaluation of Contingency Telemedical Support
                       to Improve Casualty Care at a Simulated Military

                                 Intermediate Resuscitation Facility:
                                           The EM-ANGEL Study



            Robert Gerhardt, MD, MPH, FACEP; Johnathon Berry, DO; Robert L. Mabry, MD, FACEP;
                 Lawrence Flournoy, BSPE; Robert G. Arnold, PhD; Christopher Hults, MD, FACS;
              John B. Robinson, PA-C; Robert A. Thaxton, MD, FACEP; Ramon Cestero, MD, FACS;
            Jason D. Heiner, MD; Alexandra R. Koller, BS; Kevin M. Cox, RN, MSN; Jay N. Patterson;
                   Warren R. Dalton, MD, FACEP; Anne L. McKeague, PhD; Gary Gilbert, PhD;
                                 Carl Manemeit, MA; Bruce D. Adams, MD, FACEP





          ABSTRACT
          Objective: We sought to determine whether Contingency   95) was 12 minutes (10–14) for CTS versus 18 (16–20)
          Telemedical Support (CTS) improves the success rate and   for controls, with 75% of control teams not complet-
          efficiency of primary care providers performing critical   ing all critical actions. Conclusion: In this model, real-
          actions during simulated combat trauma resuscitation.   time telementoring of simulated trauma resuscitation
          Critical actions included advanced airway, chest decom-  was feasible and improved accuracy and efficiency of
          pression, extremity hemorrhage control,  hypothermia   non–emergency-trained resuscitators. Clinical validation
          pre vention, antibiotics and analgesics, and hypotensive   and replicated study of these findings for guiding remote
          resuscitation, among others. Background: Recent studies   damage control resuscitation are warranted.
          report improved survival associated with skilled triage
          and treatment in the out-of-hospital/preoperative phase   Keywords: military medicine, war, emergency medical ser-
          of combat casualty care. Historically, ground combat   vices, resuscitation, telemedicine, wounds and injuries
          units are assigned primary care physicians and physician
          assistants as medical staff, due to resource limitations.
          Although they are recognized as optimal resuscitators,
          demand for military trauma surgeons and emergency   Introduction
          physicians exceeds supply and is unlikely to improve in   Victims of trauma who experience ongoing and uncon-
          the near term. Methods: A prospective trial of telemedical   trolled major hemorrhage (UMH), coupled with pro-
          mentoring during a casualty resuscitation encounter was   longed evacuation periods prior to surgical intervention,
          studied using a high-fidelity patient simulator (HFPS).   are more likely to die.  Both the contemporary battle-
                                                                                 1
          Subjects were randomized and formed into experimental   field and the emerging domestic phenomenon of region-
          (CTS) or control teams. CTS team leaders were equipped   alized emergency care networks reflect this scenario.
          with a headset/microphone interface and telementored
          by a combat-experienced emergency physician or trauma   The use of telemedicine in trauma is not a new con-
          surgeon. A standardized, scripted clinical scenario and   cept. Several prior studies have investigated the effects
          HFPS were used with 14 critical actions. At completion,   of care in rural intermediate resuscitation facilities, us-
          subjects were surveyed. Statistical approach included   ing telementoring between their emergency departments
          contingency table analysis, two-tailed t-test, and correla-  and receiving trauma centers within their network of
          tion coefficient. This study was reviewed and approved   care.  Prior studies comparing rural and urban-based
                                                                 2,3
          by our institutional review board (IRB).  Results: Eigh-  emergency medical services (EMS) organizations identi-
          teen CTS teams and 16 control teams were studied. By   fied associations between distance from a metropolitan
                                                                                                           4,5
          intention-to-treat ITT analysis, 89% of CTS teams versus   hub and a decrement  in scope-of-practice  rendered.
          56% of controls completed all life-threatening inventions   If clinical demonstrations validate our hypothesis, CTS
          (LSIs) (p < .01); 78% versus 19% completed all critical   adapted for domestic use may provide a bridge across
                                                                                         6,7
          actions (p < .01); and 89% versus 56% established ad-  this geospatial “quality chasm.”  It is likely that telep-
          vanced airways within 8 minutes (p < .06). Average time   resence in multiple forms will become a critical under-
          to completion in minutes (95% confidence interval [CI]   pinning of emerging regionalized healthcare networks. 8



                                                          50
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63