Page 27 - JSOM Winter 2025

Acknowledgments 12. Zietlow J, Hernandez M, Bestland A, et al. Decompression of ten-
The authors gratefully acknowledge the men and women sion pneumothorax in a trauma patient -first use of a novel de-
who donate their remains to support medical research. With- compression colorimetric capnography device in human patient.
out their precious gift, untimely death and needless suffering Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021;69(2):391–393. doi:10.1007/
s11748-020-01471-7
would prevail. We would also like to thank the UTSW Willed 13. Sanchez LD, Straszewski S, Saghir A, et al. Anterior versus lat-
Body Program and staff for their tireless efforts that enhance eral needle decompression of tension pneumothorax: compar-
the medical arts. ison by computed tomography chest wall measurement. Acad
Emerg Med. 2011;18(10):1022–1026. doi:10.1111/j.1553-2712.
Author Contributions 2011.01159.x
ED, JS, and AK conceived the study concept. JA and SB co- 14. Goh S, Xu WR, Teo LT. Decompression of tension pneumothora-
ordinated the facility and materials. AL, JA, EE, SB, and AK ces in Asian trauma patients: greater success with lateral approach
and longer catheter lengths based on computed tomography chest
coordinated and collected the data. IH, JR, and DW analyzed wall measurements. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2018;44(5):767–
the data. AL wrote the first draft. All authors read and edited 771. doi:10.1007/s00068-017-0853-z
the manuscript with approval of the final manuscript. 15. Laan DV, Vu TD, Thiels CA, et al. Chest wall thickness and de-
compression failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis com-
Disclosures paring anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy. Injury. 2016;
The authors have nothing to disclose. 47(4):797–804. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2015.11.045
16. Lesperance RN, Carroll CM, Aden JK, Young JB, Nunez TC. Fail-
ure rate of prehospital needle decompression for tension pneumo-
Funding thorax in trauma patients. Am Surg. 2018;84(11):1750–1755.
No funding was received for this work. 17. Rodriguez RC, Sandoval C, Perdue M, Monti J, Walker J. Ac-
curacy of needle thoracostomy site selection among U.S. Army
References medics. Med J (Ft Sam Houst Tex). 2023;(Per 23-4/5/6):60–64.
1. Sahota RJ, Sayad E. Tension Pneumothorax. In: StatPearls [Inter- 18. Lubin JS, Knapp J, Kettenmann ML. Paramedic understanding of
net]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed June 3, 2024. https:// tension pneumothorax and needle thoracostomy (NT) site selec-
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559090/ tion. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27013. doi:10.7759/cureus.27013
2. Deaton TG, Drew B, Montgomery HR, Butler FK Jr. Tactical 19. Ausman J, Achay J, Lopez R. Tension pneumothorax. Presented
Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) guidelines: January 25, 2024. J at: First There First Care–Gathering of Eagles EMS Conference;
Spec Oper Med. 2024;24(1):100–108. doi:10.55460/QT3B-XK5B June 2022; Hollywood, FL.
3. Lyng JW, Ward C, Angelidis M, et al. Prehospital trauma compen- 20. Bolleter S, Rahm S, Willhoite L, Achay J, Howard C. Tension
dium: traumatic pneumothorax care – a position statement and pneumothorax: finding safer, more effective way forward. North
resource document of NAEMSP. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2024:1– American Rescue. Published 2019. Accessed July 22, 2025.
21. doi:10.1080/10903127.2024.2416978 https://www.narescue.com/downloadable/download/sample/
4. Warner KJ, Copass MK, Bulger EM. Paramedic use of needle tho- sample_id/2311/
racostomy in the prehospital environment. Prehosp Emerg Care. 21. Kruse A, Achay J, Swenson J, Thompson S, Wampler D. Cross-
2008;12(2):162–168. doi:10.1080/10903120801907299 over study comparing 14G and 10G needle decompression in
5. Weichenthal L, Crane D, Rond L. Needle thoracostomy in the cadaver pneumothorax model. Presented at: Special Operations
prehospital setting: a retrospective observational study. Prehosp Medical Association; May 4, 2022; Raleigh, NC.
Emerg Care. 2016;20(3):399–403. doi:10.3109/10903127.2015. 22. North American Rescue. SPEAR Decompression Needle System
1102992 Training Videos. North American Rescue. Accessed June 3, 2024.
6. Clemency BM, Tanski CT, Rosenberg M, May PR, Consiglio https://www.narescue.com/videos#SPEAR
JD, Lindstrom HA. Sufficient catheter length for pneumothorax 23. Neupane K, Jamil RT. Physiology, Transpulmonary Pressure. In:
needle decompression: a meta-analysis. Prehosp Disaster Med. StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2024. Accessed June
2015;30(3):249–253. doi:10.1017/S1049023X15004653 3, 2024. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559004/
7. Robitaille-Fortin M, Norman S, Archer T, Mercier E. Prehospi- 24. Sullivan GM, Feinn RS. Facts and fictions about handling mul-
tal decompression of pneumothorax: a systematic review of re- tiple comparisons. J Grad Med Educ. 2021;13(4):457–460. doi:
cent evidence. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2021;36(4):450–459. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-21-00599.1
10.1017/S1049023X21000509 25. Dezube R. How to do needle thoracostomy. Merck Manuals.
8. Leonhard G, Overhoff D, Wessel L, et al. Determining optimal July 2022. Accessed June 12, 2024. https://www.merckmanuals.
needle size for decompression of tension pneumothorax in chil- com/professional/pulmonary-disorders/how-to-do-pulmonary-
dren – a CT-based study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. procedures/how-to-do-needle-thoracostomy#Contraindications_
2019;27(1):90. doi:10.1186/s13049-019-0671-x v43765703
9. Ball CG, Wyrzykowski AD, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. Thoracic nee- 26. Smith B. Trauma stabilizing procedures. In: Cone D, Brice JH,
dle decompression for tension pneumothorax: clinical correlation Delbridge TR, Myers JB, eds. Emergency Medical Services. 3rd ed.
with catheter length. Can J Surg. 2010;53(3):184–188. John Wiley & Sons; 2015:336.
10. Norris EA, McEvoy CS, Leatherman ML, et al. Comparison 27. Nicks BA, Manthey D. Pneumothorax. In: Tintinalli JE, Stap-
of 10- versus 14-gauge angiocatheter for treatment of tension czynski J, Ma O, Yealy DM, Meckler GD, Cline DM. eds. Tin-
pneumothorax and tension-induced pulseless electrical activity tinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide.
with hemorrhagic shock: bigger is still better. J Trauma Acute 9th Ed. McGraw-Hill Education; 2020: 457-463. Accessed Oc-
Care Surg. 2020;89(2S Suppl 2):S132–S136. doi:10.1097/TA. tober 5, 2024. https://accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.
0000000000002724 aspx?bookid=1658§ionid=109429615
11. Leatherman ML, Fluke LM, McEvoy CS, et al. Bigger is better:
comparison of alternative devices for tension hemopneumotho- PMID: 41365519; DOI: 10.55460/3LUF-6PW2
rax and pulseless electrical activity in a Yorkshire swine model.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017;83(6):1187–1194. doi:10.1097/
TA.0000000000001684

10-Gauge versus 14-Gauge NDC for tPTX | 25