Page 126 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 126

FIGURE 4  Success rate of abdominal aortic and junctional tourniquet application after one hour of training
                    (median time for application).


































                                                                                                        14
                                                                                             29
          surveys after using the device and universally praised its battle-  Notably, studies by Schechtman et al.,  Do et al.,  and
          field applicability, ease of use, and potential to save lives. The     Brännström et al. were designed to simulate TCCC scenarios
          high usability ratings highlight its intuitive design and practi-  or prolonged evacuation situations where access to defini-
          cality in austere environments.  Some criticism was directed at   tive care is significantly delayed. While these studies provide
                                 10
          concerns over material durability, with some users concerned   critical information on the use of the device in austere envi-
          that the device might fail under stress. Notably, as a single-use   ronments, their findings may not be directly generalizable to
          device, the current AAJT model has since been improved with   civilian trauma care. Nonetheless, they have highlighted the
          enhanced materials based on user feedback. 10      potential utility of the AAJT in extreme conditions, an area
                                                             that requires further exploration.
          Based on seven animal studies, it can be generalized that the
          AAJT can prolong survival until the end of each observation   Despite these challenges, the diversity of available literature is
          period, even when different resuscitation strategies were em-  also a strength. While the heterogeneity of studies precludes
          ployed in swine models. Despite its limitations, the AAJT of-  meta-analysis, it draws attention to key areas that require
          fers clear advantages: it is cost-effective, practical, and quick   standardized methodologies. The lack of consistency in study
          to implement. 10,20  Compared to alternative interventions, its   protocols complicates direct comparisons and emphasizes the
          financial and logistical demands are minimal, making it a po-  urgent need for consensus in research design to advance the
          tentially valuable tool in prehospital trauma care. 20  field beyond its current fragmented state.

          The AAJT is considered to be a device with low training re-  Future Directions
                   23
          quirements,  and Smith’s findings reinforce this assertion. The   In the future, documented case series and reports will be essen-
          indication of a possible elevation in the rate of ROSC could   tial to expand the clinical knowledge base on the real-world ef-
          be attributed to the positive resuscitative effects of AAJT, as   fectiveness of the AAJT. Future clinical trials should investigate
          observed in previous animal studies. 11–13         its impact on survival and neurological outcomes. Studies on
                                                             intermittent hemostasis, partial bladder inflation, and more pre-
          Strengths and Limitations                          cise pressure areas in future EHCD designs may provide novel
          Although this review has certain limitations, it also highlights   strategies to mitigate ischemic complications. Studies regarding
          critical gaps in the literature and provides a basis for future   the AAJT in human patients provide the higher-level evidence
          research. The main challenge was the limited availability of   required to advance the field, regardless of the difficulties of
          data on human patients, particularly in emergency services.   producing randomized controlled trials with new emergency
          This population would have been the ideal focus, firstly, given   medicine interventions. Addressing these gaps is essential for
          our research question, and secondly, because human data have   evaluating the clinical value of abdominal aorta compression
          fundamentally greater levels of evidence. Further, the risk of   in both prehospital and hospital trauma care and ensuring its
          bias in the AAJT animal studies is unclear on average. Never-  optimal integration into EMS and military trauma protocols.
          theless, the inclusion of animal studies provides valuable phys-
          iological insights, even if variations in resuscitative strategies   Despite  significant  advances  in  trauma  care,  hemorrhagic
          obscure precise conclusions about the role of the AAJT in pro-  shock remains associated with high mortality rates, highlight-
          longing survival time.                             ing the urgent need for innovative interventions. The interplay

          124  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 3 / Fall 2025
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131