Page 98 - JSOM Winter 2024
P. 98

with the diagnostic accuracy of other imaging modalities to   7.  Turkcuer I, Atilla R, Topacoglu H, et al. Do we really need plain
          evaluate for FBs. Lastly, comparison of the effects of POCUS   and soft-tissue radiographies to detect radiolucent foreign bodies
          training on accuracy rates between conventional line medics   in the ED? Am J Emerg Med. 2006;24(7):763–768. doi:10.1016/j.
                                                                ajem.2006.03.013
          and SF medics could be studied.                     8.  Manthey DE, Storrow  AB, Milbourn JM,  Wagner BJ. Ultra-
                                                                sound versus radiography in the detection of soft-tissue foreign
                                                                bodies.  Ann Emerg Med. 1996;28(1):7–9. doi:10.1016/s0196-
          Conclusion                                            0644(96)70130-0
          SF medics with minimal ultrasound training are capable of ac-  9.  Ginsburg MJ, Ellis GL, Flom LL. Detection of soft-tissue foreign
          curately identifying wooden FBs with POCUS. Larger FBs are   bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography,
                                                                and ultrasonography.  Ann Emerg Med. 1990;19(6):701–703.
          identifiable with good sensitivity and specificity. The size and   doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82483-7
          orientation of the FB, as well as its proximity to fibrous tissues,   10.  Graham DD. Ultrasound in the emergency department: detec-
          are important factors in accurate identification. Our study sup-  tion of wooden foreign bodies in the soft tissues. J Emerg Med.
          ports that ultrasound is an easily obtainable and valuable skill   2002;22(1):75–79. doi:10.1016/s0736-4679(01)00440-1
          for SF medics to aid in the detection of superficial, soft tissue   11.  Hile DC, Morgan AR, Laselle BT, Bothwell JD. Is point-of-care
                                                                ultrasound accurate and useful in the hands of military medical
          FBs. This capability has the potential to enhance medical care   technicians? A review of the literature. Mil Med. 2012;177(8):983–
          in austere environments, emphasizing the value of  POCUS as a   987. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-12-00020
          critical tool in the arsenal of SF medics.         12.  Driskell DL, Gillum JB, Monti JD, Cronin A. Ultrasound evalua-
                                                                tion of soft-tissue foreign bodies by US Army medics. J Med Ul-
                                                                trasound. 2018;26(3):147–152. doi:10.4103/JMU.JMU_12_18
          Acknowledgments                                    13.  Fleming ME, Heiner JD, Summers S, April MD, Chin EJ. Diag-
          The authors would like to acknowledge Michael Fredericks   nostic accuracy of emergency bedside ultrasonography to detect
          (Statistician, Madigan Army Medical Center) for his assistance   cutaneous wooden foreign bodies: Does size matter? J Spec Oper
          with statistical analysis with this study.            Med. 2017;17(4):72–75. doi:10.55460/85XR-NO49
                                                             14.  Jacobson JA, Powell A, Craig JG, Bouffard JA, van Holsbeeck MT.
                                                                Wooden foreign bodies in soft tissue: detection at US. Radiology.
          Author Contributions                                  1998;206(1):45–48. doi:10.1148/radiology.206.1.9423650
          JH conceived the study and worked with VB on study design.   15.  Bonatz E, Robbin ML, Weingold MA. Ultrasound for the diagno-
          JH and VB performed the study and collected the data. KO   sis of retained splinters in the soft tissue of the hand. Am J Orthop
          and TM performed data analysis, interpretation, and drafted   (Belle Mead NJ). 1998;27(6):455–459.
          the manuscript. Final approval of the version of the manu-  16.  Rooks VJ, Shiels WE, Murakami JW. Soft tissue foreign bodies: A
          script to be published was given by KO, TM, and VB.   training manual for sonographic diagnosis and guided removal. J
                                                                Clin Ultrasound. 2020;48(6):330–336. doi:10.1002/jcu.22856
                                                             17.  Soudack M, Nachtigal A, Gaitini D. Clinically unsuspected for-
          Disclaimer                                            eign  bodies:  the  importance  of  sonography.  J  Ultrasound  Med.
          The view(s) expressed herein are those of the author(s) and   2003;22(12):1381–1385. doi:10.7863/jum.2003.22.12.1381
          do not reflect the official policy or position of Madigan Army   18.  Mohammadi A, Ghasemi-Rad M, Khodabakhsh M. Non-opaque
          Medical Center, the US  Army Medical Department, United   soft tissue foreign body: sonographic findings. BMC Med Imag-
                                                                ing. 2011;11:9. doi:10.1186/1471-2342-11-9
          States Army Special Operations Command, the US Army Of-  19.  Leung A, Patton A, Navoy J, Cummings RJ. Intraoperative so-
          fice of the Surgeon General, the Department of the Army, De-  nography-guided removal of radiolucent foreign bodies. J Pediatr
          partment of Defense, or the US Government.            Orthop. 1998;18(2):259–261.
                                                             20.  Nienaber  A, Harvey M, Cave G.  Accuracy of bedside ultra-
                                                                sound  for  the detection  of soft  tissue  foreign bodies  by  emer-
          Disclosures                                           gency doctors. Emerg Med Australas. 2010;22(1):30–34. doi:10.
          The authors have nothing to disclose.                 1111/j.1742-6723.2009.01255.x
                                                             21.  Orlinsky M, Knittel P, Feit T, Chan L, Mandavia D. The compara-
          Funding                                               tive accuracy of radiolucent foreign body detection using ultraso-
          No funding was received for this work.                nography. Am J Emerg Med. 2000;18(4):401–403. doi:10.1053/
                                                                ajem.2000.7315
                                                             22.  Hampton KK, Vasios WN, Loos PE. SOLCUS: update on point-
          References                                            of-care ultrasound in special operations medicine. J Spec Oper
          1.  Crystal CS, Masneri DA, Hellums JS, et al. Bedside ultrasound for   Med. 2016;16(1):58–61.
            the detection of soft tissue foreign bodies: a cadaveric study. J Emerg   23.  Morgan AR, Vasios WN, Hubler DA, Benson PJ. Special oper-
            Med. 2009;36(4):377–380. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.071  ator level clinical ultrasound: an experience in application and
          2.  Schlager D, Sanders AB, Wiggins D, Boren W. Ultrasound for the   training.  J Spec Oper Med. 2010;10(2):16–24. doi:10.55460/
            detection of foreign bodies. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20(2):189–191.   BNPY-WWQ8
            doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(05)81220-x                24.  Davis J, Czerniski B, Au A, Adhikari S, Farrell I, Fields JM. Diag-
          3.  Yanay O, Vaughan DJ, Diab M, Brownstein D, Brogan TV. Retained   nostic accuracy of ultrasonography in retained soft tissue foreign
            wooden foreign body in a child’s thigh complicated by severe nec-  bodies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Emerg Med.
            rotizing fasciitis: a case report and discussion of imaging modali-  2015;22(7):777–787. doi:10.1111/acem.12714
            ties for early diagnosis. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2001;17(5):354–355.   25.  Hill R, Conron R, Greissinger P, Heller M. Ultrasound for the
            doi:10.1097/00006565-200110000-00009                detection of foreign bodies in human tissue.  Ann Emerg Med.
          4.  Imoisili MA, Bonwit AM, Bulas DI. Toothpick puncture injuries   1997;29(3):353–356. doi:10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70347-0
            of the foot in children.  Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2004;23(1):80–82.   26.  Friedman DI, Forti RJ, Wall SP, Crain EF. The utility of bedside
            doi:10.1097/00006454-200401000-00026                ultrasound and patient perception in detecting soft tissue foreign
          5.  Levine  MR,  Gorman  SM,  Young  CF,  Courtney  DM.  Clinical   bodies in children.  Pediatr Emerg Care. 2005;21(8):487–492.
            characteristics and management of wound foreign bodies in the   doi:10.1097/01.pec.0000173344.30401.8e
            ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2008;26(8):918–922. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.   27.  Schlager D. Ultrasound detection of foreign bodies and proce-
            2007.11.026                                         dure guidance. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1997;15(4):895–912.
          6.  Turner J, Wilde CH, Hughes KC, Meilstrup JW, Manders EK. Ul-  doi:10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70338-2
            trasound-guided retrieval of small foreign objects in subcutane-
            ous tissue.  Ann Emerg Med. 1997;29(6):731–734. doi:10.1016/  PMID: 39621007; DOI: 10.55460/WQLG-2AM0
            s0196-0644(97)70192-6

          96  |  JSOM   Volume 24, Edition 4 / Winter 2024
   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103