Page 19 - JSOM Spring 2024
P. 19

Disclosures                                           control of limb bleeding in a manikin model. J Spec Oper Med.
              None of the authors have any financial relationships rele-  2016;16(2):21–17.
              vant to this article to disclose, and there was no outside   22.  Dory RE, Cox DD, Endler BM. Evaluation of Extremity Tourni-
              funding. PW and CB are paid by their respective institutions,   quets in the Hands of Non-medical Personnel in Simulated Field
                                                                    Conditions (Report No. 2015-52). Naval Medical Research Unit –
              and the other authors were volunteer researchers. None of   San Antonio; 2015.
              the authors owns stock in any tourniquet companies, and   23.  Wall P, Buising C, Sahr S. Review: Getting Tourniquets Right =
              none do any paid consulting with any tourniquet companies.   Getting Tourniquets Tight. J Spec Oper Med. 2019;19(3):52–63.
              The authors talk to and share data with any and all com-  24.  Ochoa J, Fowler TJ, Gilliatt RW. Anatomical changes in periph-
              panies and individuals who are interested and do not keep   eral nerves compressed by a pneumatic tourniquet. J Anat. 1972;
              any  tourniquet- related  secrets.  The  lab  equipment  belongs   113(3):433–455.
              to Drake University and UnityPoint Health Iowa Methodist
              Medical Center.                                    PMID: 38300879; DOI: 10.55460/P75U-HM00

              References
              1.  Kragh JF Jr, Walters TJ, Baer DG, et al. Practical use of emergency
                 tourniquets to stop bleeding in major limb trauma.  J Trauma.
                 2008;64:S38–S50.
              2.  Kragh JF Jr, Littrel ML, Jones JA, et al. Battle casualty survival
                 with emergency tourniquet use to stop limb bleeding. J Emerg
                 Med. 2011;41(6):590–597.
              3.  Wall PL, Duevel DC, Hassan MB, et al. Tourniquets and occlu-
                 sion: the pressure of design. Mil Med. 2013;178(5):578–587.
              4.  Wall PL, Coughlin O, Rometti M, et al. Tourniquet  pressures:
                 strap  width  and  tensioning  system  widths.  J  Spec  Oper  Med.
                 2014;14(4):19–29.
              5.  Wall PL, Sahr SM, Buising CM. Different width and tightening
                 system emergency tourniquets on distal limb segments. J Spec
                 Oper Med. 2015;15(4):28–38.
              6.  Slaven SE, Wall PL, Rinker JH, et al. Initial tourniquet pressure
                 does not affect tourniquet arterial occlusion pressure. J Spec Oper
                 Med. 2015;15(1):39–49.
              7.  Wall PL,  Weasel J, Rometti M, et al. Pressures under 3.8cm,
                 5.1cm, and side-by-side 3.8cm-wide tourniquets.  J Spec Oper
                 Med. 2016;16(2):28–35.
              8.  Wall P, Buising C, Grulke L, et al. Effectiveness of pulse oxime-
                 try versus Doppler for tourniquet monitoring. J Spec Oper Med.
                 2017;17(1):36–44.
              9.  Wall PL, Buising CM, Nelms D, et al. Effects of distance between
                 paired tourniquets. J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(4):37–44.
              10.  Wall P, Buising C, Hingtgen, et al. Clothing effects on limb tour-
                 niquet application. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(2):83–94.
              11.  Hingtgen E, Wall P, Buising C. OMNA Marine tourniquet self-
                 application. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(3):52–61.
              12.  Wall P, Buising C, Hingtgen E, et al. Limb position change affects
                 tourniquet pressure. J Spec Oper Med. 2021;21(1):11–17.
              13.  Dory RE, Cox DD, Endler BM. Joint Operational Evaluation of
                 Field Tourniquets (JOEFT) – phase IIIA (Report No. 2016-42).
                 Naval Medical Research Unit – San Antonio; 2016.
              14.  McKeague  AL, Cox D.  Joint Operational Evaluation of Field
                 Tourniquets – Final Report Phase 1 (Report No. 2012-013). Na-
                 val Medical Research Unit - San Antonio; 2012.
              15.  Dory RE, Cox DD, Endler BM. Test and Evaluation of New York
                 City Industries for the Blind Tourniquets – Phase 1 (Report No.
                 2014-23). Naval Medical Research Unit - San Antonio; 2014.
              16.  Wall P, Hingtgen E, Buising C. Pressure responses of tourniquet
                 practice  models  to  calibrated  force  applications.  J  Spec  Oper
                 Med. 2021;21(2):11–17.
              17.  Hingtgen E, Wall P, Buising C. Characterizing a system for mea-
                 suring limb tourniquet pressures. J Spec Oper Med. 2020;20(1):
                 47–54.
              18.  Hester A, Robinson C, Kinser R, Wall P, Hopman L. Increasing
                 confidence in performance of non-pneumatic limb tourniquets. In
                 Homeland Security and Public Safety: Research, Applications and
                 Standards. ASTM International; 2019:237–246.
              19.  Beaven A, Briard R, Ballard M, Parker P. Two new effective tour-
                 niquets for potential use in the military environment: a serving
                 soldier study. Mil Med. 2017;182(7):e1929–e1932.
              20.  Kragh JF Jr, Aden JK 3rd, Dubick MA. Evaluation of models of
                 pneumatic tourniquet in simulated out-of-hospital use.  J Spec
                 Oper Med. 2016;16(3):21–29.
              21.  Gibson R, Aden JK 3rd, Dubick MA, Kragh JF Jr. Preliminary
                 comparison of pneumatic models of tourniquet for prehospital

                                                                                                  TPT2 Pressures  |  17
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24