Page 50 - JSOM Winter 2021
P. 50

to ‘Always’. For increased salience, trainees were advised to   Training Satisfaction
          interpret ‘competition’ items as the use of skills during oper-  A training satisfaction questionnaire was developed to mirror
          ations, real-world events, and simulations with an evaluation   salient items in the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8),
          component (including the Adaptive Environmental Simulation   an eight-item measurement of global satisfaction used widely
          during training). They were also advised to regard ‘practice’   in evaluating client satisfaction with care. It is utilized in the
          items as those skills used during self or unit-based practice,   SIT-NORCAL (HSR) protocol measurement system (see Part
          drills, educational upgrade training, and physical training.  1).  Items include feedback on the trainee’s perception of
                                                               16
                                                             training in five domains: training quality, value, amount, occu-
          Incorporation of Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback  pational relevance, and salience, as well as whether they would
          To further engage trainees in objective self-monitoring and im-  recommend the training to others. Additional information was
          prove immediate feedback in response to skills practice, the   gathered on perception of relevance for each of the modules
          emWave Desktop (HeartMath, www.heartmath.com), a heart   in the training, and open feedback areas were incorporated to
          rhythm monitoring system, was installed on laptops for use by   allow for additional recommendations for enhancing training.
          participants during training (Phases I and II). It was also used
          as a demonstration tool to increase physiological awareness   Procedures
          in response to training. One or two trainees demonstrated the
          use of the skill being practiced (e.g., diaphragmatic breath-  Intervention Implementation and Maintenance (Unit
          ing retraining, progressive muscle relaxation). Results were   Tailoring and Engagement Procedures)
          monitored continuously throughout the skills practice and   Following Phase 0, the resultant draft of the protocol was ini-
          utilized as a visual learning tool for the group to enhance dis-  tiated with a group of USAF EOD personnel in Southern Cal-
          cussion, insight, and adaptive skills practice. All trainees were   ifornia (n = 10, 2019) by one of the SMEs from Phase 0 who
          measured pre- and post-training, given the instructions to   had  transferred  during  protocol  development.  Planning  and
          ‘use every skill they know to relax for 10 minutes.’ Measure-  final protocol tailoring occurred intermittently over 1 month
          ments for both achievement scores and efficiency scores (time   (via email and phone) with both SMEs from Phase 0 to ensure
          required to threshold over an achievement score of 40) were   fidelity across simulation components and advancement from
          recorded and incorporated into trainee feedback. During the   lessons learned.
          Adaptive Environmental Simulation, the device was attached
          to the back of a flak vest worn by the trainee, with the readout   Training Sequence
          facing the observer, who was trained to interpret color-coded   Overarching training goals identified by the RAND study were
                                                                                                    1
          readouts (red = stress, blue = neutral, green = calm) from the   utilized in anchoring the design and development.
          trainee’s response to elements within the simulation.
                                                             Phase I: Education/Conceptualization
                                                             1.  Increase battlefield airmen’s conceptual understanding of
          Adaptative Capability
          The SIT-NORCAL protocol was established as a health and   how stress affects their emotions, thoughts, decision mak-
          human performance hybrid. Therefore, the Situational Adap-  ing, and performance.
          tation to Stress Scales (SASS) were designed as a hybridized   Phase II: Skills Acquisition and Consolidation
          measurement system capable of measuring across a spectrum   2.  Increase battlefield airmen’s repertoire of behavioral and
          of skills and abilities targeted by a hybrid protocol. The SASS   cognitive skills that can aid performance under stress.
          system measures adaptive capability, despite the impact of   Phase III: Application and Follow Through
          physical and psychological stress. The SASS for Health Sus-  3.  Provide opportunities  for battlefield airmen to practice
          tainment and Restoration (SASS-HSR) was originally designed   these new skills while performing job duties under stressful
          for measuring training impacts on adaptative and functional   conditions that approximate the operational environment.
          capability in the SIT-NORCAL (HSR) protocol.  The ini-
                                                 15
          tial baseline measurement is a 9-item Likert self-report scale   Educational, Catalytic, Adaptive, and Simulation elements
          measuring how well trainees perceive they are performing   were integrated into the training sequence. Core educational
          before SIT (score range 9–45), where higher scores indicate   concepts were selected based on those likely to confer the
          higher perceived skill or ability. Post-training measurement   greatest advantage in expanding core capacities. These con-
          is an 18-item scale, where the original nine items from the   cepts were then sequenced and organized strategically to en-
          baseline measurement are completed to measure perceived   sure self-awareness and that physiologic regulation skills were
          change. Items 10–18 are designed to measure perception of   mastered prior to engaging cognitive skills, as these require
                                                                                                          17–20
          pre-training ability and performance (insight/hindsight; i.e.,   greater levels of physiological awareness and control.
          how well participants feel they were  actually performing at   Biomechanical Control skills in Phase I (e.g., Human Physiol-
          Time 1, pre-training, given the skills and knowledge they ac-  ogy/Cognitive Neurobiology, Self-Awareness, Diaphragmatic
          quired in SIT-NORCAL [HP]). The wording in items nine and   Breathing, etc.) are trained prior to introducing the higher-level
          18 from the original SASS-HSR was augmented for salience   cognitive skills in Phase II (Mental Agility/Flexibility). This en-
          in the human performance context (SASS for Human Per-  sures the trainee has adequate self-awareness, a grasp of how
          formance [HP]). Additionally, all items were used as anchors   to manipulate their physiology when the fight/flight response
          for the development of an expanded measurement system for   is  activated,  and  skill  mastery  in  deploying  the  prescribed
          exploring specific training impact and the ability to deploy   countermeasures. This enables rapid recognition and resto-
          target skills during the Adaptive Environmental Simulation   ration of bioavailable oxygen required to ‘power’ key brain
          (SASS- Simulation (SIM)), and Real-World events (SASS-RW).   functions related to physical and psychological performance.
          Open feedback areas were incorporated to allow additional
          information to be generated by trainees and further training   A recognized example is that poor breathing regulation re-
          opportunities to be identified.                    duces speed of information processing, fine motor dexterity,


          48  |  JSOM   Volume 21, Edition 4 / Winter 2021
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55