Page 106 - JSOM Winter 2019
P. 106

9.  Fitzwater J, Arthur C, Hardy L. “The tough get tougher”: mental   Operational Medicine Research Program, Medical Research and
             skills training with elite military recruits.  Sport Exerc Perform   Materiel Command; 2017.
             Psychol. 2017;7.                                18.  Grier RA.  Military cognitive readiness at the operational and
          10.  Gucciardi DF. Mental toughness: progress and prospects. Curr   strategic levels: a theoretical model for measurement develop-
             Opin Psychol. 2017;16:17–23.                       ment. J Cogn Eng Decis Making. 2012;6(4):358–392.
          11.  Arrieux JP, Cole WR, Ahrens AP. A review of the validity of com-  19.  Shay J. Moral injury. Psychoanal Psychol. 2014;31(2):182–191.
             puterized neurocognitive assessment tools in mild traumatic brain   20.  Currier JM, Holland JM, Malott J. Moral injury, meaning mak-
             injury assessment.  Concussion (London, England).  2017;2(1):   ing, and mental health in returning veterans.  J Clin Psychol.
             CNC31–CNC31.                                       2015;71(3):229–240.
          12.  Cole WR, Arrieux JP, Schwab K, et al. Test–retest reliability of   21.  Ames D, Erickson Z, Youssef NA, et al. Moral injury, religiosity,
             four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active   and suicide risk in U.S. veterans and active duty military with
             duty military population. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2013;28(7):   PTSD symptoms. Mil Med. 2018.
             732–42.                                         22.  Koenig HG, Youssef NA, Ames D, et al. Moral injury and religi-
          13.  Cole WR, Gregory E, Arrieux JP, et al. Intraindividual cognitive   osity in US veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms.
             variability: an examination of ANAM4 TBI-MIL simple reaction   J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018;206(5):325–331.
             time data from service members with and without mild traumatic   23.  Smith-MacDonald LA, Morin J-S, Brémault-Phillips S. Spiritual
             brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2018;24(2):156–162.  dimensions of moral injury: contributions of mental health chap-
          14.  Bauer RM, Iverson GL, Cernich AN, et al. Computerized neu-  lains in the Canadian Armed Forces. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:
             ropsychological assessment devices: joint position paper of the   592–592.
             American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology and the Na-  24.  Dedeli O, Kaptan G. Spirituality and religion in pain and pain
             tional Academy of Neuropsychology. Arch Clin Neuropsychol.   management. Health Psychol Res. 2013;1(3):e29.
             2012;27(3):362–373.                             25.  Weber SR, Pargament KI. The role of religion and spirituality in
          15.  Coffman I, Resnick HE, Drane J, et al. Computerized cognitive   mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(5):358–363.
             testing norms in active-duty military personnel: potential for con-  26.  Bonelli RM, Koenig HG. Mental disorders, religion and spiritu-
             tamination by psychologically unhealthy individuals. Appl Neu-  ality 1990 to 2010: a systematic evidence-based review. J Relig
             ropsychol Adult. 2018;25(6):497–503.               Health. 2013;52(2):657–673.
          16.  Salmon JP, Jones SAH, Wright CP, et al. Methods for validating   27.  Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: a review and up-
             chronometry of computerized tests.  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol.   date. Adv Mind Body Med. 2015;29(3):19–26.
             2017;39(2):190–210.                             28.  National Academies of Sciences. Strengthening the Military Fam-
          17.  Proctor SP, Heaton KJ, Lieberman HR, et al.  Military Cogni-  ily Readiness System for a Changing American Society. Washing-
             tive Performance and Readiness Assessment Initiative. Military   ton, DC: The National Academies Press; 2019.


















              PROLONGED FIELD CARE



               When you need to keep your people in theater and down range!



               MULTIPLE SHAPES & SIZES
               SAME APPLICATION PROTOCOL

               •  Eradicates MRSA in the dressing in 4 hours
                                                                                   FOR MORE INFORMATION,
               •  Peer-reviewed clinical studies demonstrate                               CONTACT
                 dressing’s effectiveness
               •  Can be worn for up to 7 days                                      ARGENTUM MEDICAL
               •  “Go to” wound care dressing in Combat and Support                    888.558.9923
                 Hospitals and Tactical Forward Surgical Teams
                                                                                       SILVERLON.COM
               •  Recommended sizes:
                 °  BWD-466 (4” x 66”)     °  BWD-6108 (6” x 108”)     °  CM-333-Z (3” x33”)  DAPA #: SP-0200-09-H-0019
                                                                                            LC-SMM-76-A




          104  |  JSOM   Volume 19, Edition 4 / Winter 2019
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111