Page 34 - JSOM Fall 2018

movement in mountainous terrain to be generally twice as Disclosures
large as that of an MRAP evacuation. The study also validated The authors have indicated they have no financial relation­
movement techniques and demonstrated that an ad hoc team ships relevant to this article.
of students could maintain average acceleration well below
those maximums for the vast majority of the time. These gen­ Author Contributions
eralizations help frame decision making for small­unit leaders JF conceived the study concept. JF and CF devised the study
faced with casualties in austere conditions. If air evacuation design. JF collected the data. JF and CF analyzed the data and
requires delay or if the next level of care is only accessible wrote the manuscript. All authors approved the final version
by dismounted movement, teams in similar terrain can feel of the manuscript.
confident that such a movement could result in similar maxi­
mum acceleration as alternative options. In such cases, route References
planning and timing could effectively mitigate the handful of 1. Shanahan DF. Chapter 6. Human tolerance and crash survivabil­
high­amplitude impacts witnessed in this study. ity. In: North Atlantic Treaty Organization­ Science and Technol­
ogy Organization report RTO­EN­HFM­113. Neuilly­sur­Seine,
France: North Atlantic Treaty Organization­ Science and Technol­
Future studies can build upon this knowledge for specific ogy Organization; 2004.
guidance to Soldiers for eventual incorporation into the ATP 2. Silbergleit R, Dedrick DK, Pape J, et al. Forces acting during air
4­25.13 framework. Importantly, sensor placement during the and ground transport on patients stabilized by standard immobili­
use of these triaxial accelerometers is paramount to obtain zation techniques. Ann Emerg Med. 1991;20(8):875–877.
quality data. Using the same mannequin and sensor config­ 3. Alberti E, Chiappa D, Moshioni G, et al. Whole body vibration in
uration from the second trial in multiple evacuation methods mountain­rescue operations. J Sound Vib. 2006;298:580–593.
and environments would better document the relationships 4. US Department of the Army. US Army Casualty Evacuation ATP
4-25.13. Washington, DC: US Department of Defense, Department
between modes of transportation. Furthermore, altering the of the Army; 2013.
litter, the training and cohesion levels of the teams, and the 5. Eiband AM. “Human tolerance to rapidly applied accelerations.”
terrain would all provide additional information when con­ National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Memo 5­19­59E.
sidering movement options. Last, the described protocol is in­ Cleveland, OH: National Aeronautics and Space Administration;
expensive and simple, producing no distractions to training or 1959.
operations. Due to these factors, triaxial accelerometers could 6. Steijer F, Lee JHT, Manoucheri N, et al. Responses of the acutely
become an important mechanism for instantaneous feedback injured spinal cord to vibration that simulates transport in helicop­
ters or mine­resistant ambush­protected vehicles. J Neurotrauma.
in training. Pairing an accelerometer with a light or auditory 2016;33:2217–2226.
signal has the potential to be a training multiplier.

Acknowledgments
We thank VTARNG and SFC Jeremy Neskey of the Army
Mountain Warfare School for insight and cooperation during
the study.

32 | JSOM Volume 18, Edition 3 / Fall 2018