Page 30 - JSOM Fall 2018
P. 30

Mechanical Forces Experienced by Simulated Patients
                           Evacuated During Dismounted Military Movement
                                             in Mountainous Terrain




                                     Jonathon Florance, BS *; Cara Florance, PhD 2
                                                           1






          ABSTRACT
          Background: Given a denied or resource­limited area of oper­  acceleration, that potentially can worsen injuries. Several fac­
          ations, when air medical evacuation would require extended   tors complicate understanding the effects of these mechanical
          delay, should dismounted movement through difficult terrain   forces. First, impacts can vary depending on mission­specific
          dissuade an attempt of immediate ground evacuation? Under­  factors, including mission, enemy, terrain, troops, time, and
          standing the magnitude of external forces during dismounted   civilian considerations. Second, precise human physiologic ef­
          movement would inform planning in such circumstances.   fects are difficult to correlate to observed impacts. Human tol­
          Objectives: We assessed the mechanical impact experienced   erance to acceleration is a function of extrinsic factors such as
          during dismounted evacuation from mountainous terrain.   magnitude, direction, duration, rate of onset, and positioning
          We also describe a protocol using a portable accelerometer   of the patient, and also intrinsic factors, including the patient’s
                                                                                           1
          to evaluate evacuation. Materials and Methods: A triaxial ac­  age, health, and physical conditioning.  Therefore, instead of
          celerometer and a semiflexible litter were used to collect data   direct physiologic effects, we sought to understand the mea­
          during the Army Mountain Warfare School Rough Terrain   sured impacts of dismounted movement through the context
          Evacuation Course. We used the generalized extreme value   of other modes of military evacuation so a comparison of
          (GEV) distribution, using maximum likelihood estimation,   evacuation methods can guide battlefield decisions.
          to model maximum acceleration values. Results: It was deter­
          mined that the accelerometer should be mounted directly onto   Although other investigators have studied acceleration forces in
          a mannequin when using semiflexible litters. GEV analysis   the context of civilian medical evacuation, none, to our knowl­
          from a mannequin­mounted trial revealed that for 1­minute   edge, have done so in the context of dismounted tactical mili­
                                                                         2,3
          evacuation  intervals,  10%  would have  a  maximum  acceler­  tary movement.  The secondary objective of this work was to
          ation over a value between 2.4g and 3.7g. This interval en­  evaluate and present a protocol that will allow additional and
          compasses the maximum acceleration from evacuation using a   congruent data collection for different environments to create
          Mine­Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle, measured   an accurate characterization of dismounted movement in oper­
          by the US Army Aeromedical Research Laboratory. The peak   ational environments specific to each team. An accelerometer, a
          acceleration from a 75­minute, mannequin­mounted trial was   device that measures acceleration forces, was used in this study.
          5.5g, approximately twice as large as the MRAP maximum.   The use of accelerometers during dismounted training can pro­
          Conclusion:  For the evacuee, the acceleration experienced   vide valuable feedback to military personnel who are honing
          during dismounted evacuation in mountainous terrain can be   skills that may reduce trauma to evacuees.
          comparable to MRAP evacuation, especially with sufficient
          planning that avoids points of maximum impact. Leaders can   Materials and Methods
          consider this comparison during planning.
                                                             The study design was approved by the Vermont National
          Keywords: acceleration; movement; military personnel; emer-  Guard State Judge Advocate General. The discrete and nonin­
          gencies; warfare; stretchers; transportation; rescue work  vasive accelerometer did not alter the existing training curric­
                                                             ulum in any form.


          Introduction                                       Terrain and Litter Description
                                                             This study was conducted in collaboration with the Army
          The necessity of conducting military operations in remote   Mountain Warfare School. Data collection occurred at the
          and austere mountain environments is clear from recent con­  Camp Ethan Allen Training Site in Jericho, Vermont, in April
          flicts. Deployed far from logistical support, Special Operations   2017 during the Rough Terrain Evacuation Course culmina­
          Forces routinely rely on dismounted movement even when   tion exercise. The weather  during data collection was 48°F
          faced with medical emergencies. Concerned with the pros­  (9°C) and overcast. The terrain was wooded, with steep to
          pect of an extended aviation delay, Operators may consider   gradually sloping granite faces. The culmination event in­
          alternative evacuation that includes dismounted movement.   cluded two individual legs, totaling approximately 1 mile or
          During such transport, an injured patient on a litter may expe­  2 hours of patient movement. Soldiers pulled the litter across
          rience a mechanical impact, resulting in sudden and transient   the ground as a sled, carried the litter over obstacles such as
          *Correspondence to jonathon_florance@hms.harvard.edu
          1 CPT Florance, US Army National Guard, currently is a student at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. He is a former Special Forces
          Officer (C/2/10, B/5/19, SOD­K). He earned his BS at the US Military Academy.  Dr Florance is a principal scientist at CoPhysics Corporation.
                                                                  2
                                                           28
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35