Page 92 - JSOM Summer 2018
P. 92

Are the King LTS Laryngeal Tube and the Ambu AuraOnce
                    Laryngeal Mask Useful Airway Adjuncts for Military Medics?




                                                          1
                                     Danny Regnér, CRNA *; Peter Frykholm, MD    2








          ABSTRACT
                                                                                    1–4
          Background: Airway management is a critical skill that may   prehospital trauma victims.  Failure  to supply  adequate
          be essential in the battlefield. The aim of this study was to   oxygenation may result in a quick death of the trauma pa-
          determine if combat life savers and medics with no or lim-  tient; a protected, unobstructed airway and adequate venti-
          ited clinical experience could provide airway control using   lation are required to prevent the patient from experiencing
                                                                      5,6
          the disposable laryngeal suction tube (LTS-D) and the Ambu    hypoxemia.   Various  solutions  to  secure  the  airway  in  a
                                                         ®
                  ™
            AuraOnce  disposable laryngeal mask (LMA).  Methods:   combat setting have been implemented depending on the best
          Eight military medics with limited clinical experience and   practice, training, legal issues, medical culture, and environ-
          no airway management experience secured the airway on 19   ment. 1,5,7,8  The best practice for securing an airway may be to
          intrahospital anesthetized patients using the LTS-D and the   use highly educated and experienced professionals for airway
          LMA. Each patient was treated with both airway adjuncts in   management in the battlefield. 5,8,9  Such personnel could be an-
          a randomized order. Each medic was studied on at least two   esthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, or other personnel who are
          and not more than three patients. Success of insertion, num-  highly clinically skilled in airway management (professional
          ber of attempts, and time to correct placement with verified   airway providers).
          ventilation were recorded. Results: When using the LTS-D, the
          first-attempt success rate for the medics with the first patient   In the first line of combat operations, there is a shortage of
          was 50% (four of eight) and 75% (six of eight) on the sec-  this type of personnel. They need not only adequate medical
          ond attempt. With the second patient, the first-attempt success   skills but must also be able to perform combat operations and
          rate was 87.5% (seven of eight), and on the third patient, it   cope with the physical effort and stress of the battlefield. 11,12
          was 100% (three of three). For all patients, the accumulated   The shortage of medical personnel with these abilities and the
          first-attempt success rate was 73.7% (14 of 19) and 84.2%   demand of having a high alert status for deployment compel
          (16 or 19) for second attempts with the LTS-D. The success   many armed forces to lean on the permanent medics for first-
          rate on first attempt with the LMA was 100% (19 of 19) on   line casualty care.
          the first patient. On the second intervention with the LMA,
          there was a significant decrease in mean time to verified venti-  An  integral  component  of  casualty  care  is  airway  manage-
          lation, from 56.4 seconds to 27.7 seconds (p = .043), and time   ment. According to Mabry et al.  and Champion et al.,
                                                                                                            14
                                                                                        13
          to verified ventilation with no leakage, from 61.3 seconds to   airway injuries needing airway interventions account for 1%
          32.3 seconds (p = .029). Insertion attempts for three LTS-Ds   to 1.8% of the deaths in a combat environment. Due to the
          and one LMA failed. Conclusion: This study suggests that for   need for upholding military skills, as well as demand for de-
          the safe use of the laryngeal tube suction by inexperienced   ployment and other tasks, it may be difficult for the military
          airway providers, a clinical training program is required. The   medics to uphold clinical airway skills on a level with profes-
          LMA proved superior to the LTS-D with a 100% success rate   sional airway providers. The methods of airways management
          at the first attempt, which suggests that minimal training is   used by military medics range from manual maneuvers (e.g.,
          needed before clinical use. We therefore recommend the LMA   chin lift, jaw thrust) to rapid sequence induction and surgical
          as the primary airway adjunct for military medics, despite a   cricothyrotomy.
          hypothetically inferior protection from aspiration.
                                                             Due to the significant risk of fatal complications that can result
          Keywords: airway; airway management; combat; education;   from intubation 3,8,14  and the difficulty of performing endotra-
          laryngeal tube; laryngeal tube suction; laryngeal mask; mili-  cheal intubation in an military environment, alternate strate-
          tary medicine; supraglottic airway                 gies for obtaining a more secured airway using medics with
                                                             minimal training and clinical skills were studied. This was an
                                                             attempt to mirror a worst-case scenario with medics deploying
                                                             with no or little clinical experience of airway management.
          Introduction
          Reports from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan have   An alternative to placing a cuffed tube and securing the airway
          shown frequencies as high as 10.5% (range, 4.1%–10.5%)   is using one of several types of alternative airway devices. The
          regarding the use of advanced airway management in military   criteria for a useful alternative airway device are that it should
          *Correspondence to danny.regner@mil.se
          1 Mr Regnér is a senior chief petty officer and nurse anesthetist serving in the Swedish Armed Forces.  Dr Frykholm is an anesthesiologist at the
                                                                                2
          Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
                                                           90
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97