Page 28 - JSOM Spring 2018
P. 28

The decision was made to intubate, using etomidate for induc-  of the warmed 1L NS bolus were given. The patient’s HR re-
          tion and succinylcholine for paralysis. Despite three attempts   sponded to these interventions. Telemetry showed normal si-
          to intubate with direct laryngoscopy, the vocal cords were not   nus rhythm of 95 bpm and MAP of 75mmHg; however, within
          well visualized. The fourth attempt with a bougie adjunct was   5 minutes, his rhythm reverted to atrial fibrillation at a rate of
          successful, and the patient proceeded at 07:00 local time with   130 bpm. An additional diltiazem 10mg IV bolus resulted in
          the Dustoff crew to an alternate Role 2 facility, where a tail-to-  normal sinus rhythm at 75 bpm and MAP of 60mmHg.
          tail handoff was planned. A mechanical malfunction of the pa-
          tient’s endotracheal tube (ETT) occurred en route to the Role 2   Initial arterial blood gas (ABG) sample results were as fol-
          facility; the ETT endcap was dislodged. Dustoff Medics were   lows: pH, 6.681; partial pressure of carbon dioxide (Pco ),
                                                                                                           2
          able to oxygenate the patient through a poorly seated bag-  42mmHg; partial pressure of oxygen (Po ), 145mmHg; base
                                                                                              2
          valve-mask on the uncapped ETT, with tape used as a field-  deficit, −30mEq; sodium (Na), 132mEq/L; potassium (K),
          expedient connector. The FST performed a tube exchange in   6.4mEq/L; chloride (Cl), 111mEq/L; bicarbonate (HCO − ),
                                                                                                          3
          one successful attempt. During the procedure, the patient was   <5mEq/L, ionized calcium (iCa), 1.06mmol/L, hemoglobin,
          paralyzed with 10mg of vecuronium IV, sedated with 2mg of   11.9g/dL; and lactate, 2.8mmol/L, consistent with severe an-
          versed IV, and given 100mg of ketamine IV. Once the airway   ion-gap metabolic acidosis (AGMA), respiratory acidosis, and
          and invasive mechanical ventilation were secured, the Dustoff   nonanion-gap metabolic acidosis (NAGMA; Table 1). Initial
          crew proceeded with the patient to the Role 3 facility, arriving   diagnoses were moderately severe hypothermia, diabetic ke-
          at 10:10 local time (almost 12 hours after initial medevac).  toacidosis (DKA), and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular
                                                             response complicated by hypovolemic shock. The renal panel
          In the resuscitation bay at the Role 3 facility, the patient was   at T+40 minutes confirmed mild acute kidney injury (blood
          on a litter in a Blizzard Rescue Blanket (Blizzard Protection   urea nitrogen [BUN]/creatinine [Cr] ratio, 161.3), hyperkale-
          Systems,  http://www.blizzardsurvival.com) without a head   mia, and hyperchloremic acidosis.
          cover and lying supine on a cold Ready-Heat Blanket (Tech-
          Trade, http://www.ready-heat.com/). On examination, he was
          intubated with a 7.0F ETT, 19cm at the teeth. The Glasgow   TABLE 1  Interpretation of Acid-Base Disorders With Brief
                                                             Discussion of Arterial Blood Gas Analysis
          Coma Scale score was 3T; the patient had sluggishly reactive
          bilateral pupils, was breathing passively on the ventilator set   Arterial blood    pH, 6.682; Pco , 42.3mmHg; Po ,
                                                                                      2
                                                                                                  2
                                                              gas values
                                                                            145mmHg; base excess, −30mEq; Sao , 94%
          at assist control, fraction of inspired oxygen (Fio ) was 100%,                             2
                                                2
          RR was 10/min, total lung volume was 450mL, and positive   Basic metabolic   Na, 132mEq/L; K, 6.4mEq/L; Cl, 110mEq/L;
                                                                                −
                                                                            HCO , <5mEq/L; BUN, 16mg/dL; Cr, 1.3mg/
                                                              panel
                                                                               3
          end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) was 5cmH O. Other invasive         dL; blood glucose, 552mg/dL; anion gap,
                                           2
          devices included two peripheral intravenous lines, an oral-gas-   22mEq/L; lactate, 2.8mmol/L
          tric tube (OGT), and a Foley catheter drain containing 150mL   Step 1: Determine  The patient has a primary metabolic acidosis,
                                                                                                       −
          of light yellow urine. The patient’s initial rectal temperature   the primary acid-  indicated by the low pH and low HCO  level.
                                                                                                       3
          was 31°C (88°F), blood pressure was 153/94mmHg (mean ar-  base disorder  The patient’s acidosis is an AGMA, because
          terial pressure [MAP], 92mmHg), HR was 165 bpm, RR was            the anion gap is 22mEq/L (normal, 12mEq/L).
                                                                            Given the mildly elevated lactate level, the
          10/min, and Sao  was 99% on 100% Fio . His examination            cause of the patient’s AGMA is ketoacidosis.
                       2
                                           2
          was remarkable for tachycardia, obtundation, paralysis, and   Step 2: Is the   Because the patient’s primary disorder is
          cold extremities. His 12-lead electrocardiogram demonstrated   compensation   AGMA, the appropriate compensation
          atrial fibrillation with a ventricular rate of 161 bpm and   for the primary   is respiratory alkalosis. To determine the
          prominent Osborn waves in the precordial leads (Figure 1).  disorder   expected Pco , use the formula Pco  = 1.5 ×
                                                                                     2
                                                                                                    2
                                                                                −
                                                              appropriate?  HCO  + 8. In our patient, the expected Pco
                                                                                                          2
                                                                               3
          FIGURE 1  Twelve-lead electrocardiogram demonstrating atrial      for appropriately compensated AGMA is
          fibrillation with a ventricular rate of 161 bpm and prominent     8mmHg. His Pco  is 42mmHg, which means,
                                                                                        2
          Osborn waves in the precordial leads.                             in addition to AGMA, he has severe respiratory
                                                                            acidosis that likely is iatrogenic, because he was
                                                                            paralyzed and, without any respiratory drive,
                                                                            his minute ventilation was fully ventilator
                                                                            dependent.
                                                              Step 3. Is there a   Because the patient has AGMA, it is necessary
                                                              Δ gap?        to rule out a mixed acid-base disorder such
                                                                            as metabolic alkalosis or NAGMA. First,
                                                                            determine the ΔAG, then determine the
                                                                            ΔHCO − . The ΔAG (aka, excess AG) is the
                                                                                3
                                                                            patient’s actual AG minus the normal AG (22
                                                                                                      −
                                                                                            −
                                                                            − 12 = 10). The ΔHCO  (aka, HCO  deficit)
                                                                                            3
                                                                                                     3
                                                                                         −
                                                                            is the normal HCO  minus the measured
                                                                                         3
                                                                                −
                                                                            HCO  (24 − 0 = 24). The ratio is 10/24 =
                                                                               3
                                                                            0.41. This indicates the patient has a “hidden”
                                                                            NAGMA in addition to a primary AGMA and
                                                                            a severe respiratory acidosis. An alternate,
                                                                            simpler calculation to determine the Δ gap is
          The Role 3 team recognized the patient’s extremis, and re-        Na − Cl − 36. If the result is < −6, NAGMA
          warming measures were initiated at time 0 minutes (T+0). The      exists. For the listed values, Δ gap calculated by
          patient received a 500mL IV bolus of warmed NS, a Bair Hug-       this simpler equation is 132 − 110 − 36 = −14.
          ger (3M,  https://www.bairhugger.com) was applied,  and his   Δ, change in; AG, anion gap; AGMA, anion-gap metabolic acido-
          head was covered. His initial blood glucose level was 552mg/  sis; BUN, blood urea nitrogen; Cr, creatinine; HCO − , bicarbonate;
                                                                                                  3
                                                             NAGMA, nonanion-gap metabolic acidosis; Pco , partial pressure
                                                                                                2
          dL. In the first 30 minutes, fentanyl 50μg, midazolam, 2mg,   of  carbon  dioxide;  Po ,  partial  pressure  of  oxygen;  Sao ,  oxygen
          diltiazem 10mg, regular insulin 10 units IV, and the remainder     saturation.  2           2
          24  |  JSOM   Volume 18, Edition 1/Spring 2018
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33