Page 113 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2017
P. 113

38.  Kearns AK, Bilbie CL, Clarkson PM, et al. The creatine ki-  innovativeness, authoritarianism, and performance.  J  Pers.
                 nase response to eccentric exercise with atorvastatin 10mg or   2006;74(2):575–597.
                 80mg. Atherosclerosis. 2008;200:121–125.        59.  Maddi SR. The courage and strategies of hardiness as help-
              39.  Deuster PA, Zelazowska EB, Singh A, et al. Expression of lym-  ful in growing despite major, disruptive stresses. Am Psychol.
                 phocyte subsets after exercise and dexamethasone in high and low   2008;63(6):563–564.
                 stress responders. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999;31(12):1799–1806.  60.  Killgore WD, Vo AH, Castro CA, et al. Assessing risk propen-
              40.  Kilian Y, Engel F, Wahl P, et al. Markers of biological stress in   sity in American soldiers: preliminary reliability and validity
                 response to a single session of high-intensity interval  training   of the Evaluation of Risks (EVAR) scale—English version. Mil
                 and high-volume training in young athletes.  Eur J Appl   Med. 2006;171(3):233–239.
                 Physiol. 2016;116:2177–2186.                    61.  Latkin CA, Knowlton AR. Social network assessments and
              41.  Negrão AB, Deuster PA, Gold PW, et al. Individual reactivity   interventions for health behavior change: a critical review. Be-
                 and physiology of the stress response. Biomed Pharmacother.   hav Med. 2015;41(3):90–97.
                 2000;54(3):122–128.                             62.  Cole SW. Social regulation of human gene expression: mecha-
              42.  Singh A, Petrides JS, Gold PW, et al. Differential hypothalamic-  nisms and implications for public health. Am J Public Health.
                 pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity to psychological and physical   2013;103(suppl 1):S84–92.
                 stress. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(6):1944–1948.  63.  Notterman DA, Mitchell C. Epigenetics and understand-
              43.  Morgan CA 3rd, Wang S, Southwick SM, et al. Plasma neu-  ing the impact of social determinants of health. Pediatr Clin
                 ropeptide-Y concentrations in humans exposed to military   North Am. 2015;62(5):1227–1240.
                 survival training. Biol Psychiatry. 2000;47(10):902–909.  64.  Toyokawa S, Uddin M, Koenen KC, et al. How does the so-
              44.  Morgan CA 3rd, Rasmusson AM, Wang S, et al. Neuropep-  cial environment ‘get into the mind’? Epigenetics at the inter-
                 tide-Y, cortisol, and subjective distress in humans exposed to   section of social and psychiatric epidemiology. Soc Sci Med.
                 acute stress: replication and extension of previous report. Biol   2012;74(1):67–74.
                 Psychiatry. 2002;52(2):136–142.                 65.  Van Dongen HPA, Mott CG, Huang JK, et al. Optimization
              45.  Gaffney-Stomberg E, Lutz LJ, Shcherbina A, et al. Associa-  of biomathematical model predictions for cognitive perfor-
                 tion between single gene polymorphisms and bone biomark-  mance impairment in individuals: accounting for unknown
                 ers and response to calcium and vitamin D supplementation   traits and uncertain states in homeostatic and circadian pro-
                 in young adults undergoing military training. J Bone Miner   cesses. Sleep. 2007;30(9):1129–1143.
                 Res. (In press).                                66.  Blackhurst JL, Stone MO, Gresham JS. The quantified war-
              46.  Leonska-Duniec A, Ahmetov, II, Zmijewski P. Genetic vari-  rior: how DoD should lead human performance augmenta-
                 ants influencing effectiveness of exercise training programmes   tion. Armed Forces J. 2012;December:1–12.
                 in obesity—an overview of human studies. Biol Sport. 2016;   67.  Ford K, Glymour C. The enhanced warfighter. Bull Atomic
                 33(3):207–214.                                     Scientists. 2014;70(1):43–53.
              47.  Bouchard C, Rankinen T, Timmons JA. Genomics and genet-  68. Lange K. 3rd Offset Strategy 101: what it is, what the tech
                 ics in the biology of adaptation to exercise. Compr Physiol.   focuses are. http://www.dodlive.mil/index.php/2016/03/3rd
                 2011;1(3):1603–1648.                               -offset-strategy-101-what-it-is-what-the-tech-focuses-are/.
              48.  Barberio MD, Huffman KM, Giri M, et al. PDPR gene ex-  Accessed 16 February 2017.
                 pression correlates with exercise-training insulin sensitivity   69.  Cummings M. Man versus machine or man + machine? 2014.
                 changes. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:2387–2397.  http://hal.pratt.duke.edu/sites/hal.pratt.duke.edu/files/u10/IS
              49.  Schroeder BO, Backhed F. Signals from the gut microbiota   -29-05-Expert Opinion%5B1%5D_0.pdf. Accessed 13 Octo-
                 to distant organs in physiology and disease. Nat Med. 2016;   ber 2016.
                 22(10):1079–1089.                               70.  Broadband blues: why has broadband Internet access taken
              50.  Proctor C, Thiennimitr P, Chattipakorn N, et al. Diet, gut   off in some countries but not in others? The Economist. 21
                 microbiota and cognition. Metab Brain Dis. 2017;32:1–17.  June 2001. http://www.economist.com/node/666610. Accessed
              51.  Arnolds KL, Lozupone CA. Striking a balance with help from   16 February 2017.
                 our little friends—how the gut microbiota contributes to im-
                 mune homeostasis. Yale J Biol Med. 2016;89(3):389–395.
              52.  Sze MA, Schloss PD. Looking for a signal in the noise: revisit-
                 ing obesity and the microbiome. MBio. 2016;7(4).  Dr Russell  is a program manager in the Defense Sciences
              53.  Fountain-Zaragoza S, Londeree A, Whitmoyer P, et al. Dis-  Office at the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
                 positional  mindfulness and  the  wandering mind: Implica-  (DARPA) in Arlington, Virginia. He is interested in experimen-
                 tions for attentional control in older adults. Conscious Cogn.   tal platforms and tools to facilitate discovery, quantification,
                 2016;44:193–204.
              54.  Kaufman SB.  A proposed integration of the expert perfor-  and “big validation” of fundamental measures in the social and
                 mance and individual differences approaches to the study of   behavioral sciences, and human performance. Prior to DARPA,
                 elite performance. Front Psychol. 2014;5:707.   he was a program manager at the Intelligence Advanced Re-
              55.  Randall JG, Oswald FL, Beier ME. Mind-wandering, cogni-  search Projects Activity, and before that, he was in industry,
                 tion, and performance: a theory-driven meta-analysis of at-  where he was a senior scientist and principal investigator on
                 tention regulation. Psychol Bull. 2014;140(6):1411–1431.  many human performance and social science research projects.
              56.  Thomson DR, Besner D, Smilek D. A resource-control account
                 of sustained attention: evidence from mind-wandering and   Dr Deuster is a professor and director of the Consortium for
                 vigilance paradigms. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2015;10(1):82–96.  Health and Military Performance: A Defense Center of Excel-
              57.  Chen G, Gully SM, Whiteman JA, et al. Examination of re-  lence, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uni-
                 lationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like
                 individual differences, and learning performance. J Appl Psy-  formed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland. She can be
                 chol. 2000;85(6):835–847.                       reached at Uniformed Services University, 4301 Jones Bridge
              58.  Maddi SR, Harvey RH, Khoshaba DM, et al. The personal-  Road, Bethesda, MD 20814.
                 ity construct of hardiness, III: Relationships with repression,   E-mail: patricia.deuster@usuhs.edu.



              Precision Performance: What Does It Mean?                                                       89
   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118