Page 43 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2016
P. 43

Postural Stability of Special Warfare
                             Combatant-Craft Crewmen With Tactical Gear



                           Paul M. Morgan, MS; Valerie J. Williams, DPT; Timothy C. Sell, PhD






              ABSTRACT

              Background: The US Naval Special Warfare’s Special   to  loads  that  may  exceed  the  Soldier’s  body  weight.
                                                                                                                1
              War fare Combatant-Craft Crewmen (SWCC) operate on   The amount of gear worn for protection and tactical
              small, high-speed boats while wearing tactical gear (TG).   operation has significantly contributed to improving
              The TG increases mission safety and success but may af-  military operations. The added weight, however, ap-
              fect postural stability, potentially increasing risk for mus-  pears to increase pain and the risk for musculoskeletal
              culoskeletal injury. Therefore, the purpose of this study   injury, which is a significant problem in the US military:
              was to examine the effects of TG on postural stability   more than 700,000 such injuries were reported as of
              during the Sensory Organization Test (SOT). Methods:   2006.  The cause of musculoskeletal injuries may be
                                                                      1-4
              Eight SWCC performed the SOT on NeuroCom’s Bal-    due to multiple factors, including overuse, performing
              ance Manager with TG and with no tactical gear (NTG).   military duties in body armor, or even leisure activities
              The status of gear was performed in randomized order.   and exercise. 3,5-7
              The SOT consisted of six different conditions that chal-
              lenge sensory systems responsible for postural stability.   One risk factor for injury is decreased postural stability
              Each condition was performed for three trials, resulting   or, simply stated, one’s balance.  Postural stability can
                                                                                            8,9
              in a total of 18 trials. Results: Overall performance, each   be affected by the increased amount of weight worn by
              individual condition, and sensory system analysis (soma-  military Servicemembers by moving the center of mass
              tosensory, visual, vestibular, preference) were scored.   superiorly and anteriorly, altering sensory input, hinder-
              Data were not normally distributed therefore Wilcoxon   ing response time, increasing task difficulty by influenc-
              signed-rank tests were used to compare each variable (p   ing mobility, and increasing the risk for musculoskeletal
              = .05). No significant differences were found between   injury. 1,3,4,10-15  Schiffman et al.  observed decreased pos-
                                                                                          16
              NTG and TG tests. No statistically significant differences   tural stability in military personal performing static
              were detected under the two TG conditions. This may be   tasks with weights of 6kg, 16kg, and 40kg. The addi-
              due to low statistical power, or potentially insensitivity   tion of load carriage has been shown to increase pos-
              of the assessment. Also, the amount and distribution of   tural sway during static upright stance, suggesting that
              weight worn during the TG conditions, and the SWCC’s   the external load negatively affects the ability of the
              unstable occupational platform, may have contributed   individual to maintain postural stability while decreas-
              to the findings. The data from this sample will be used   ing mobility for occupational tasks. 11,12,16  Further, Sell et
              in future research to better understand how TG affects   al.  performed a standardized jumping task to simulate
                                                                   17
              SWCC. Conclusion: The data show that the addition of   military activities and observed that TG negatively af-
              TG used in our study did not affect postural stability of   fects dynamic postural stability. It was concluded that
              SWCC during the SOT. Although no statistically signifi-  the  observed  decrement  in  dynamic  postural  stability
              cant differences were observed, there are clinical reasons   when wearing TG may lead to increased risk for muscu-
              for continued study of the effect of increased load on pos-  loskeletal injury. 17
              tural stability, using more challenging conditions, greater
              surface perturbations, dynamic tasks, and heavier loads.  Although  there  have  been  numerous  studies  of  pos-
                                                                 tural stability and military load carriage, the effect of
              Keywords: postural stability; tactical gear; sensory organi-  body armor on postural stability of Special Operations
              zation test; Navy; SWCC                            Forces (SOF) Special Warfare Combatant-Craft Crew-
                                                                 men (SWCC) is unknown. The postural stability of this
                                                                 specific group is particularly important because of the
                                                                 specialized environment and conditions in which they
              Introduction
                                                                 work. SWCC perform special missions on small, high-
              Tactical gear (TG) worn by US military members has sig-  speed water craft on ocean and small-river water sys-
              nificantly increased in weight since the late 19th  century    tems for the insertion and extraction of SOF in areas



                                                              27
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48