Page 42 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Summer 2016
P. 42

Pressures Under 3.8cm, 5.1cm,
                            and Side-by-Side 3.8cm-Wide Tourniquets



               Piper L. Wall, DVM, PhD; Jacob Weasel, MD; Mary Rometti, BS; Sarah Birkholz, BA;
               Yvonne Gildemaster, BS; Lisa Grulke, BA; Sheryl Sahr, MD; Charisse M. Buising, PhD







          ABSTRACT

          Background: Applications of wider tourniquet are ex-  Keywords:  tourniquet; hemorrhage; first aid; emergency
          pected to occlude arterial flow at lower pressures. We   treatment
          examined pressures under 3.8cm-wide, 5.1cm-wide, and
          side-by-side-3.8cm-wide nonelastic strap-based tourni-
          quets. Methods: Ratcheting Medical Tourniquets (RMT)   Introduction
          were applied mid-thigh and mid-arm for 120 seconds with
          Doppler-indicated occlusion. The RMTs were a Single   Rapidly applied, effective, emergency use tourniquets
          Tactical RMT (3.8cm-wide), a Wide RMT (5.1cm-wide),   save lives by stopping arterial blood flow.  Based on
                                                                                                  1,2
          and Paired Tactical RMTs (7.6cm-total width). Tighten-  results with pneumatic tourniquets on limbs,  wider ef-
                                                                                                    3
          ing completion was measured at one-tooth advance past   fective limb tourniquet designs are expected to stop ar-
          arterial occlusion, and paired applications involved alter-  terial blood flow at lower tourniquet applied pressures.
          nating tourniquet tightening. Results: All 96 applications   Lower  tourniquet  pressures  are  expected  to  carry  less
          on the 16 recipients reached occlusion. Paired tourniquets   risk of nerve injury and to be easier to achieve.
          had the lowest occlusion pressures (p < .05). All pressures
          are given as median mmHg, minimum-maximum mmHg.    The most commonly used limb tourniquets in the US
          Thigh application occlusion pressures were Single 256,   military are composed of a mechanical advantage tight-
          219–299; Wide 259, 203–287; Distal of Pair 222, 183–  ening  system  and  a  nonelastic  strap.  Use  recommen-
          256; and Proximal of Pair 184, 160–236. Arm applica-  dations for these tourniquets include adding a second
          tion occlusion pressures were Single 230, 189–294; Wide   tourniquet immediately adjacent to the first to reach ef-
          212, 161–258; Distal of Pair 204, 193–254, and Proxi-  fectiveness should the first tourniquet not be sufficient.
                                                                                                            4
          mal of Pair 168, 148–227. Pressure increases with the fi-  Support for the effectiveness of increasing strap-based
          nal tooth advance were greater for the 2 teeth/cm Wide   tourniquet width by adding an adjacent tourniquet
          than for the 2.5 teeth/cm Tacticals (p < .05). Thigh final   comes from military limb tourniquet use data. 1,2
          tooth advance pressure increases were Single 40, 33–49;
          Wide 51, 37–65; Distal of Pair 13, 1–35; and Proximal of   The purpose of this study was to examine pressures un-
          Pair 15, 0–30. Arm final tooth advance pressure increases   der different width, nonelastic strap-based tourniquets.
          were Single 49, 41–71; Wide 63, 48–77; Distal of Pair 3,   Ratcheting Medical Tourniquets (RMTs; m2  Inc., www
                                                                                                   ®
          0–14; and Proximal of Pair 23, 2–35. Pressure decreases   .ratchetingbuckles.com)  were used because their self-
          occurred under all tourniquets over 120 seconds. Thigh   securing, ratchet-based tightening system allows finer
          pressure decreases were Single 41, 32–75; Wide 43, 28–  resolution pressure control at completion than can be
          62; Distal of Pair 25, 16–37; and Proximal of Pair 22,   achieved with current commercially available windlass
          15–37. Arm pressure decreases were Single 28, 21–43;   systems. The hypotheses were the occlusion and comple-
          Wide 26, 16–36; Distal of Pair 16, 12–35; and Proximal   tion pressures would be highest under the single 3.8cm-
          of Pair 12, 5–24. Occlusion losses before 120 seconds oc-  wide Tactical RMT, lower under the single 5.1cm-wide
          curred predominantly on the thigh and with paired appli-  Wide RMT, and lowest under the pair of 3.8cm-wide
          cations (p < .05). Occlusion losses occurred in six Paired   Tactical RMTs.
          thigh applications, two Single thigh applications, and one
          Paired arm application. Conclusions: Side-by-side tour-  Methods
          niquets achieve occlusion at lower pressures than single
          tourniquets. Additionally, pressure decreases under tour-  The Drake University Institutional Review Board ap-
          niquets over time; so all tourniquet applications require   proved this prospective study. The RMTs were requested
          reassessments for continued effectiveness.         from and donated by m2 Inc.



                                                          28
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47