Page 72 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2014
P. 72

intention to sustain their medical skills. The third fac-    November 8, 2011, no monetary compensation for par-
          tor, perceived behavior control, assessed the respondent’s   ticipation was allowed.
          control beliefs and the influence of that control. Con-
          trol beliefs assessed each individual’s perceived level of   Ethics Statement
          control on how they conduct their sustainment training,   The research protocol for this survey was approved by
          and influence of control beliefs assessed how that level of   the USUHS Institutional Review Board prior to cognitive
          control influenced their ability to conduct the behavior.  testing and survey deployment. The survey maintained
                                                             complete respondent anonymity and informed consent
          These constructs represented the foundation for assess-  was obtained when the respondent began the first page
          ing medics’ attitudes, perceived barriers, and self- efficacy,   of  the  survey  (beyond  the consent page).  The  consent
          and were operationalized by developing questions relat-  page highlighted the purpose of the study, the risks and
          ing to each component of the constructs. Answer choices   benefits of participation, alternatives to participation,
          for each question used Likert-type scales: 5-point scales   the right to withdraw, and where to get more informa-
          were used for unipolar responses, and a 7-point scale   tion. No personally identifiable or health information
          was used for bipolar answers. Three open-ended ques-  was collected and respondents were allowed to skip
          tions were included to allow respondents to provide un-  questions if desired.
          structured responses. The survey was constructed using
          LimeSurvey, an online survey program hosted on the se-  Statistical Analyses
          cure servers at the Uniformed Services University of the   Prior to analysis, data were screened for accuracy, miss-
          Health Sciences (USUHS). 18                        ing  values,  and  normality.  Descriptive  statistics  were
                                                             calculated using frequency for categorical variables.
          The final survey instrument included 47 items, several of   Subgroup comparisons using demographic information
          which included subcategories of medical care correspond-  were made based on participant characteristics (e.g.,
          ing to SFMS critical training requirements and training   Group assignment, deployment history, and time since
          manual.  Three general, open-ended questions provided   initial training) to identify underlying relationships be-
                 7
          respondents the opportunity to provide feedback in an   tween measured variables. When appropriate, analysis
          unstructured format. Demographic information was col-  of variance for subgroup comparisons or Student t test
          lected on respondent age, unit, length of military service,   to compare means was performed. Presurvey power
          length of service in special operations, time since complet-  analysis concluded that with a 40% response rate, 95%
          ing sustainment training, and deployment experience.  confidence intervals (CIs) for descriptive statistics would
                                                             generate a width of 20.7% of one standard deviation
          Initial Survey Validation                          (SD). For comparing means, a response rate of 40%
          Following initial development, the survey instrument   would still provide 80% power to find a difference of
          was evaluated and revised  through subject matter  ex-  30% of one SD (standardized effect of 0.3) based on a t
          pert review and cognitive testing with former SFMS.   test for independent samples with two groups of similar
          Through  each  stage  in  the  process,  survey  questions   size and a 5%, two-sided significance level. All analyses
          were revised to improve clarity and understanding.  were completed using SPSS 22.0 with statistical signifi-
                                                             cance level of p ≤ .05 (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY,
          Survey Implementation                              USA; http://www-01.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/).
          This survey targeted all 869 SFMS (both active duty
          and National Guard) serving in the US Special Opera-
          tions Command (USASOC). Former SFMS or SFMS        Results
          serving outside of USASOC were excluded. To recruit   The survey  had a total of 334 respondents,  which re-
          participants, a study invitation e-mail with a link to   sulted in a 38.4% overall response rate. Approximately
          the online survey was distributed through the USASOC   89% of all respondents completed the entire survey. The
          medical support channels to all potential respondents.   average respondent was 32 years old (SD: 4.9) and has
          The invitation contained a description of the study and   served in the Army for 10.5 years (SD: 4.5) and in Spe-
          a statement highlighting the voluntary nature of partici-  cial Forces for 5.4 years (SD: 3.4). Nearly 93% of the
          pation. Reminder e-mails with a link to the survey were   respondents had deployed at least once, with the average
          distributed to all potential respondents 2 and 4 weeks   having 4.2 deployments (SD: 3.5). The average respon-
          later. The survey was closed at the end of 6 weeks. Data   dent has been deployed in a combat zone for a total of 13
          collection was performed electronically and stored on   months (SD: 9.4), deployed in a noncombat zone for 6.5
          secure USUHS servers behind password protection. In   months (SD: 9.3), and had returned from his last deploy-
          accordance with Department of Defense Instruction   ment 9.1 months (SD: 11.6) prior to the survey. There
          3216.02, Protection of Human Subjects and Adher-   was no difference in these values between the different
          ence to Ethical Standards in DoD-Supported Research,   Special Forces Groups (SFG) except for 19th Group,



          62                                     Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 14, Edition 4/Winter 2014
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77