Page 35 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 35

In-Theater Assessment of Resuscitative Balloon Occlusion
                             of the Aorta (REBOA) Capabilities and Training



                      Alex Y. Koo, MD *; Jerry Hu, DO, PharmD ; Kyle Couperus, MD, MBA, BSN ;
                                      1
                                                               2
                                                                                                3
                            Jamie Eastman, BSN ; Thomas Kwolek, BSN ; Kyle Remick, MD     6
                                                 4
                                                                       5



          ABSTRACT
          Background:  Resuscitative  endovascular  balloon  occlusion   civilian trauma centers.  The “ER” is named after the sur-
                                                                                1,2
          of the aorta (REBOA) is an endovascular technology indi-  geons who helped develop the product. This unique endovas-
          cated for temporarily controlling traumatic life-threatening,   cular technology is used for temporarily controlling traumatic
          noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pelvic hemorrhage.   life-threatening, noncompressible abdominal, truncal, or pel-
          Through percutaneous access or cut-down to the femoral ar-  vic hemorrhage. REBOA is performed through percutaneous
          tery, an intra-aortic balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and   access or cut-down to the femoral artery. Then an intra-aortic
          inflated, occluding distal blood flow and, thus, bleeding. To de-  balloon catheter is fed into the aorta and inflated, occluding
          termine specific barriers to REBOA in deployed environments,   distal blood flow and thus bleeding.  In situations where there
                                                                                        3–6
          we  conducted  a  quality  improvement  project  and  survey  of   are multiple surgical trauma casualties and limited damage
          ER-REBOA  placement and monitoring capabilities at four   control surgery resources or delayed transportation, REBOA
                   ™
          medical treatment locations in Iraq and Kuwait during the   can be deployed for temporary hemorrhage control for up to
          spring of 2019. Methods: The primary objective was to eval-  30 or 60 minutes, when placed in zone 1 or 3, respectively.
          uate each in-theater medical site’s ability to deploy REBOA,
          which was defined as having a provider capable of placing   While there have been considerable strides in battlefield hemor-
          REBOA and the minimum equipment necessary. The investi-  rhage control, noncompressible torso injuries still account for
          gators  interviewed  providers  and  through  self-reported  sur-  13% of injuries sustained in Afghanistan and Iraq, with 17%
          veys, determined the personnel capable of placing a REBOA.   of these injuries confirmed to have ongoing noncompressible
          REBOA equipment and monitoring equipment were identified   hemorrhage.  Also, in a review of potentially survivable injuries,
                                                                       7
          through direct inspection of sites and interviews with logisti-  50%  were  truncal  hemorrhages.  In  resource-limited  settings
          cal and equipment staff. Results: A total of 113 individuals   and/or prolonged transport times, REBOA can be implemented
          participated in the evaluation and training. Three of the four   if there is delay in damage control resuscitation and/or surgery. 8
          sites had the minimum training and equipment requirements
          to complete the procedure: one REBOA-capable provider, an   Considerable challenges to the procedural success of REBOA
          unexpired ER-REBOA  device, and an unexpired introducer   include significant training and experience gaps in obtaining
                            ™
          catheter kit. Overall, 6 out of 32 physicians (18.7%) were ca-  emergent arterial and venous access, placement depth, and
          pable of placing an ER-REBOA.  Conclusion: This  deployed   management of endovascular occlusion in critically wounded
          site survey demonstrates that the minimal requirements and   patients. 9–11  Existing training programs of intra-aortic occlu-
          personnel for ER-REBOA placement were met at most studied   sion device placement, such as the American College of Sur-
          locations in 2019. However, improvements in pre-deployment   geons’ (ACS) Basic Endovascular Skills for Trauma (BEST), are
          training  of  select  medical  personnel  in  REBOA  and  arterial   often inaccessible to the wide range of military medical pro-
          blood pressure monitoring are recommended to ensure ade-  viders who may be required to perform the procedure or care
          quate resourcing and redundancy in training.       for patients after placement. REBOA training is not formalized
                                                             in any predeployment training platforms for military medical
          Keywords: REBOA; resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion   personnel. In addition, deployed environments create unique
          of the aorta; intra-aortic balloon; ER-REBOA; deployment;   challenges for military medical personnel. Deployments in-
          noncompressible hemorrhage                         volve frequent turnover of medical personnel of varying train-
                                                             ing and experience, constant battlefield movements, coalition
                                                             partners, and nonstandardized predeployment training cycles
                                                             across different deploying units.
          Introduction
          A current model for REBOA, cleared by the U.S. Food and   We seek to determine the readiness of medical units to em-
          Drug  Administration (FDA) in 2016 is the ER-REBOA    ploy REBOA in deployed environments while also creating an
                                                         ™
          ( Prytime Medical Inc., Boerne,  TX), specifically created for   educational opportunity for review and training in REBOA
          advanced trauma management both on the battlefield and at   placement by subject matter experts.
          *Correspondence to alex.koo@georgetown.edu
          1 Dr. Alex Koo is affiliated with the Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC and the
          Department of Emergency Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC.  Dr. Jerry Hu is affiliated with the Madigan Army
                                                                           2
          Medical Center, Tacoma, WA.  Dr. Kyle Couperus is affiliated with the Department of Emergency Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center,
                               3
          Tacoma, WA.  Jamie Eastman is affiliated with the United States Army.  Thomas Kwolek and  COL (Ret) Kyle Remick are affiliated with the
                    4
                                                                            6
                                                            5
          Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD.
                                                           32
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40