Page 38 - JSOM Fall 2025
P. 38

predeployment training of select medical personnel in REBOA   7.  Stannard A, Morrison JJ, Scott DJ, Ivatury RA, Ross JD, Rasmus-
          and arterial blood pressure monitoring are recommended to   sen TE. The epidemiology of noncompressible torso hemorrhage
          ensure adequate resourcing and redundancy in training.  in the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. J Trauma Acute Care Surg.
                                                                2013;74(3):830–834. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31827a3704
                                                              8.  Adams D, McDonald PL, Holland S, et al. Management of non-
          Acknowledgments                                       compressible torso hemorrhage of the abdomen in civilian and mil-
          The authors would like to express our gratitude to Oanh Tran,   itary austere environments: a scoping review. Trauma Surg Acute
          JSOM staff, Madigan’s Department of Clinical Investigation,   Care Open. 2024;9(1):e001189. doi:10.1136/tsaco-2023-001189
          Public Affairs Office, and Department of Emergency Medicine   9.  Davidson AJ, Russo RM, Reva VA, et al. The pitfalls of resuscita-
          for their review of the manuscript.                   tive endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: risk factors and
                                                                mitigation strategies. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(1):192–
                                                                202. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000001711
          Author Contributions                               10.  Ribeiro Junior MAF, Feng CYD, Nguyen ATM, et al. The com-
          KC, JE, TK, and KR participated in study design and execu-  plications associated with resuscitative endovascular balloon oc-
          tion. AK, KC, and KR participated in study analysis. AK and   clusion of the aorta (REBOA). World J Emerg Surg. 2018;13:20.
          JH participated in manuscript writing and all authors partici-  doi:10.1186/s13017-018-0181-6
          pated in manuscript review.                        11.  Saito N, Matsumoto H, Yagi T, et al. Evaluation of the safety and
                                                                feasibility of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the
                                                                aorta. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;78(5):897–903; discus-
          Disclaimer                                            sion 904. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000614
          The views expressed are those of the author(s) and do not re-  12.  Engberg M, Mikkelsen S, Hörer T, et al. Learning insertion of a re-
          flect the official policy of the Department of the Army, the   suscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA)
          Department of Defense, or the U.S. Government.        catheter: is clinical experience necessary? A prospective trial. In-
                                                                jury. 2023;54(5):1321–1329. doi:10.1016/j.injury.2023.02.048
          Disclosures                                        13.  Engberg M,  Taudorf M, Rasmussen NK, Russell L, Lönn L,
          No competing interests are held by any authors in the design,   Konge L. Training and assessment of competence in resuscitative
          writing, or review of this publication.               endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) – a sys-
                                                                tematic review. Injury. 2020;51(2):147–156. doi:10.1016/j.injury.
                                                                2019.11.036
          Funding                                            14.  Stokes  SC,  Theodorou  CM,  Zakaluzny  SA,  DuBose  JJ,  Russo
          No funding was provided for the design, execution, review, or   RM. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta
          writing of this publication.                          in combat casualties: the past, present, and future.  J Trauma
                                                                Acute Care Surg. 2021;91(2S Suppl 2):S56–S64. doi:10.1097/TA.
                                                                0000000000003166
          References                                         15.  Rees P. Response to: ‘REBOA at Role 2 Afloat: resuscitative en-
          1.  Petrone  P,  Pérez-Jiménez  A,  Rodríguez-Perdomo M,  Brathwaite   dovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as a bridge to dam-
            CEM, Joseph DK. Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of   age control surgery in the military maritime setting’ by Rees et
            the aorta (REBOA) in the management of trauma patients: a sys-  al.  J R  Army Med Corps. 2019;165(3):213–214. doi:10.1136/
            temic literature review. Am Surg. 2019;85(6): 654–662.  jramc-2018-001016
          2.  Thrailkill MA, Gladin KH, Thorpe CR, et al. Resuscitative endo-  16.  Teeter WA, Romagnoli AN, Glaser J, et al. Resuscitative endo-
            vascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA): update and in-  vascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: pushing care forward.
            sights into current practices and future directions for research and   J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(1):17–21. doi:10.55460/BQOR-ZQYJ
            implementation. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021;29(1):8.   17.  Manley JD, Mitchell BJ, DuBose JJ, Rasmussen TE. A modern case
            doi:10.1186/s13049-020-00807-9                      series of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta
          3.  Moore L, Brenner M, Kozar RA, et al. Implementation of resusci-  (REBOA) in an out-of-hospital, Combat Casualty Care setting.
            tative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta as an alternative   J Spec Oper Med. 2017;17(1):1–8. doi:10.55460/9H3H-5GPS
            to resuscitative thoracotomy for non-compressible truncal hemor-  18.  Vicente  DA,  Ugochukwu  O,  Johnston  MG,  Craft  C,  Damin V,
            rhage. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79(4):523-530; discussion   Tadlock MD. Preparing Austere Maritime Surgical Teams for de-
            530–532. doi:10.1097/TA.0000000000000809            ployment during the COVID-19 global pandemic: is it time to
          4.  Long  B,  Hafen  L,  Koyfman A,  Gottlieb  M.  Resuscitative  endo-  change the training pipeline?  Mil Med. 2021;186(9-10):e873–
            vascular balloon occlusion of the aorta: a review for emergency   e878. doi:10.1093/milmed/usaa574
            clinicians.  J Emerg Med. 2019;56(6):687–697. doi:10.1016/j.  19.  Allen CJ, Straker RJ, Murray CR, et al. Recent advances in For-
            jemermed.2019.03.030                                ward Surgical Team training at the U.S. Army Trauma Training
          5.  Pieper A, Thony F, Brun J, et al. Resuscitative endovascular balloon   Department.  Mil Med. 2016;181(6):553–559. doi:10.7205/
            occlusion of the aorta for pelvic blunt trauma and life- threatening   MILMED-D-15-00084
            hemorrhage: a 20-year experience in a Level I trauma center.  J
            Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2018;84(3):449–453. doi:10.1097/TA.
            0000000000001794                                 PMID: 40952910; DOI: 10.55460/VOEM-ODN1
          6.  Glaser J, Stigall K, Cannon J, et al. “Clinical Practice Guidelines
            for Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the  Aorta
            ( REBOA) for Hemorrhagic Shock.” Joint  Trauma System. Pub-
            lished March 31, 2020. Accessed November 9, 2020. https://jts.
            health.mil/assets/docs/cpgs/resuscitative_endovascular_balloon_
            occlusion_of_the_aorta_(reboa)_for_hemorrhagic_shock_31_
            mar_2020_id38_v1.1.pdf












          36  |  JSOM   Volume 25, Edition 3 / Fall 2025
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43