Page 77 - JSOM Winter 2024
P. 77

higher levels of commitment to life and work, belief in one’s   remote mild TBI; (2) age 16 or older at the time of injury; and
                                                          15
              ability to control outcomes, and enjoyment of challenges.  At   (3) admission to a TBI inpatient or residential rehabilitation
              the beginning of their careers, SOF personnel are more psycho-  program. 22
              logically resilient than CF. 15,16  During their careers, SOF also
              engage in more disciplined lifestyles than CF (i.e., have health-  For the current study, additional criteria included: (4) comple-
              ier diets, more physical activity, and better sleep habits), which   tion of a baseline or follow-up interview after 4/01/2018 to
                                                 17
              are protective against mental health disorders.  However, due   obtain SOF status (SOF status was backfilled if collected at a
              to intense training, frequent deployments, and chronic stress   follow-up assessment), (5) non-missing SOF status data, and
              in combat situations, SOF are exposed to more risk factors   (6) at least one PTSD self-report measure completed at any as-
              that can increase their allostatic load, which can lead to phys-  sessment time. Participants were categorized into two groups:
              ical and psychological injuries. 10,18  Consistently, increasing age   SOF and a demographically matched sample of CF.
              (proxy  for  advanced  career  level  and  more  deployments)  is
              related to greater PTSD severity in SOF.  When studies use   Procedure
                                              19
              anonymous data collection methods, point prevalence rates of   The VA TBIMS study protocols were approved by local In-
              probable PTSD in a sample of active duty SOF (8%) are con-  stitutional Review Boards and Research and Development
              sistent with rates identified in CF (6%–13%). 20   Committees at each data collection site. Informed consent
                                                                 was obtained from the participant or legal proxy prior to any
              Importantly, compared to CF, typical SOF duties confer addi-  research activities. The study adheres to all state and federal
                                      21
              tional risk for sustaining TBIs,  which are related to higher   research standards and regulations.
                         9
              rates of PTSD.  Among SOF personnel receiving inpatient TBI
              rehabilitation, rates of probable PTSD are as high as 36% as   Baseline measures were completed at the time of study enroll-
              compared with 14% in CF.  Complicating the clinical picture,   ment, which occurred during the participant’s inpatient admis-
                                   6
              SOF personnel usually seek medical and mental health treat-  sion at a PRC for TBI rehabilitation. Follow-up assessments
              ment at the end of their careers rather than acutely following   occurred via telephone at times that were anchored to the TBI
              injury. By the time they receive treatment for symptoms poten-  at 1, 2, 5, and 10 years following injury. Those with mild TBI
              tially related to the TBI, they report more mental health  and   often do not receive any medical attention until years after the
                                                          6
              physical symptoms  than CF. No studies have documented the   injury; thus, the baseline assessment could be any time after
                            21
              trajectory of PTSD symptoms after TBI in SOF. Given the dif-  the index TBI. For example, a participant who entered rehabil-
              ference in duties and potential exposures between SOF and CF   itation 3 years after sustaining a TBI and then enrolled in the
              over their military careers, results from CF may not generalize   study would complete their baseline assessment during the in-
              to SOF. Further examination of PTSD in SOF is warranted.  patient stay and be eligible for their first follow-up assessment
                                                                 at 5 years post-injury.
              Current Study
              Meeting the unique needs of SOF, including treatment plan-  Measures and Variables of Interests
              ning and resource allocation, requires knowledge about the
              trajectory of PTSD symptoms after TBI among SOF. Treatment   Demographics and Military Characteristics
              facilities that would benefit from this knowledge include the   Participant characteristics, including sociodemographic vari-
              Department of Defense (DoD) and the Department of Veterans   ables, military service, and behavioral health history, were col-
              Affairs (VA). Those outside the DoD and VA who may also   lected at baseline (at the time of admission to rehabilitation)
              benefit from knowing the evolution of PTSD symptoms in this   via a clinical interview with the study team. 22,23
              population include community providers who accept Tricare
              (insurance for active duty and retired Service Members). Due to   SOF are generally grouped into Tier 1 or Tier 2 units. Tier 1
                                                9
              the high comorbidity between PTSD and TBI  and the occupa-  units are also known as Special Mission Units and are com-
              tional hazards that put SOF at risk for these conditions, 10,18,19,21    manded by the national-level Joint Special Operations Com-
              we compared the chronicity of PTSD symptoms in SOF who   mand.  Tier 1 units include 1st Special Forces Operational
              have experienced a TBI with a matched sample of CF.  Detachment (DELTA), Naval Special  Warfare Development
                                                                 Group (DEVGRU), 24th Special Tactics Squadron, and Intel-
                                                                 ligence Support Activity (ISA). USSOCOM commands Tier 2
              Methods
                                                                 units, including Navy SEALs, Marine Raiders, Marine Force
              Participants and Settings                          Recon, Combat Controllers, Rangers, and Special Forces.
              Participants were recruited from five VA Polytrauma Rehabil-
              itation Centers (PRCs) and enrolled in the VA TBI Model Sys-  To be classified as SOF personnel in the current study, partic-
              tems (VA TBIMS) study between 2009 and 2022.       ipants answered “yes” to the question, “Have you ever served
                                                                 in a Tier 1 or Tier 2 unit? Examples of these units include
              The VA TBIMS is a longitudinal study of recovery and rehabil-  Army Green Berets and Rangers, Navy SEALs, Marine Forces
              itation outcomes among SM/Vs with a history of TBI. TBI is   Special Operations Command, Joint Special Operations Com-
              defined as a traumatically induced structural brain injury and/  mand, SOF para-rescuers, and Combat Controllers.” A partic-
              or physiological disruption of brain functioning due to exter-  ipant’s role in the SOF units was not assessed.
              nal force as evidenced by onset or worsening of any of the fol-
              lowing: loss/decreased consciousness, mental state alteration,   TBI
              memory loss for events immediately before or after the injury,   The index TBI (defined as the primary TBI being treated in re-
              transient or stable neurological deficits, or intracranial lesion.   habilitation) and its characteristics were abstracted from the
              Eligibility criteria for the parent VA TBIMS study included:   medical record at baseline. The cause of the index TBI was clas-
              (1) an admission diagnosis of TBI of any severity, including   sified as follows: motor vehicular, fall (including hard parachute

                                                                             PTSD After TBI in Special Operations Forces  |  75
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82