Page 18 - JSOM Fall 2024
P. 18

SAC participated in manuscript writing, review, and editing.   15.  Khoury A, Sall FS, De Luca A, et al. Evaluation of bag-valve-mask
          SAC provided project administration support. KD and  AA   ventilation in manikin studies: What are the current limitations?
          participated in the review and editing of the revision. JSA ac-  Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:4521767. doi:10.1155/2016/4521767
          quired the funding.                                16.  Niebauer  JM, White  ML,  Zinkan  JL, Youngblood AQ, Tofil
                                                                NM. Hyperventilation in pediatric resuscitation: performance
                                                                in simulated pediatric medical emergencies. Pediatrics. 2011;128
          Disclosures                                           (5):e1195-e1200. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3696
          The authors have submitted a United States patent application   17.  Zweiker D, Schwaberger H, Urlesberger B, et al. Does the number
          for the BENGI technology presented in this manuscript.  of fingers on the bag influence volume delivery? A randomized
                                                                model study of bag-valve-mask ventilation in infants. Children
          Funding                                               (Basel). 2018;5(10):132. doi:10.3390/children5100132
          A Louisiana State University (LSU) grant (grant number HSCS-  18.  O’Neill JF, Deakin CD. Do we hyperventilate cardiac arrest patients?
                                                                Resuscitation. 2007;73(1):82–85. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.
          2022-LIFT-001) and the Department of Molecular and Cellu-  09.012
          lar Physiology at LSU Health Shreveport supported this work.  19.  Maxey BS, White LA, Solitro GF, Conrad SA, Alexander JS. Ex-
                                                                perimental validation of a portable tidal volume indicator for bag
          References                                            valve mask ventilation. BMC Biomed Eng. 2022;4(1):9. doi:10.
           1.  Khoury A, Hugonnot S, Cossus J, et al. From mouth-to-mouth   1186/s42490-022-00066-y
             to bag-valve-mask ventilation: evolution and characteristics of   20.  You KM, Lee C, Kwon WY, et al. Real-time tidal volume feedback
             actual devices—a review of the literature. Biomed Res Int. 2014;   guides optimal ventilation during simulated CPR. Am J Emerg
             2014:762053. doi:10.1155/2014/762053               Med. 2017;35(2):292–298. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2016.10.085
           2.  Davies JD, Costa BK, Asciutto AJ. Approaches to manual venti-  21.  Khoury A, De Luca A, Sall FS, Pazart L, Capellier G. Ventilation
             lation. Respir Care. 2014;59(6):810–824. doi:10.4187/respcare.   feedback device for manual ventilation in simulated respiratory
             03060                                              arrest: a crossover manikin study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg
           3.  Aufderheide TP, Sigurdsson G, Pirrallo RG, et al. Hyperventila-  Med. 2019;27(1):93. doi:10.1186/s13049-019-0674-7
             tion-induced hypotension during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.   22.  Kim JW, Park SO, Lee KR, Hong DY, Baek KJ. Efficacy of
                                                                      ®
             Circulation.  2004;109(16):1960–1965. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.   Amflow ,  a  real-time-portable  feedback  device  for  delivering
              x0000126594.79136.61                              appropriate ventilation in critically ill patients: a randomised, con-
           4.  Aufderheide TP, Lurie KG. Death by hyperventilation: a com-  trolled, cross-over simulation study. Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:
             mon and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary re-  5296519. doi:10.1155/2020/5296519
             suscitation.  Crit Care Med. 2004;32(9 Suppl):S345–S351. doi:   23.  Heo S, Yoon SY, Kim J, et al. Effectiveness of a real-time venti-
             10.1097/01.CCM.0000134335.46859.09                 lation feedback device for guiding adequate minute ventilation:
           5.  Ruben H, Knudsen EJ, Carugati G. Gastric inflation in relation   a manikin simulation study. Medicina (Kaunas). 2020;56(6):278.
             to airway pressure. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1961;5(3):107–114.   doi:10.3390/medicina56060278
             doi:10.1111/j.1399-6576.1961.tb00089.x          24.  Bowman TA, Paget-Brown A, Carroll J, Gurka MJ, Kattwinkel
           6.  Stone BJ, Chantler PJ, Baskett PJF. The incidence of regurgitation   J. Sensing and responding to compliance changes during manual
             during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a comparison between the   ventilation using a lung model: can we teach healthcare providers
             bag valve mask and laryngeal mask airway. Resuscitation. 1998;   to improve?  J Pediatr. 2012;160(3):372–376.e1. doi:10.1016/j.
             38(1):3–6. doi:10.1016/S0300-9572(98)00068-9       jpeds.2011.09.028
           7.  Wenzel V, Idris AH, Banner MJ, Kubilis PS, Williams JL. Influence   25.  Sealed Envelope Ltd. Create a blocked randomisation list. 2022.
             of tidal volume on the distribution of gas between the lungs and   Accessed May 25, 2022. https://www.sealedenvelope.com/simple-
             stomach in the nonintubated patient receiving  positive-pressure   randomiser/v1/lists
             ventilation.  Crit Care Med. 1998;26(2):364–368. doi:10.1097/   26.  Satti R, Abid NUH, Bottaro M, et al. The application of the ex-
             00003246-199802000-00042                           tended poincaré plot in the analysis of physiological variabilities.
           8.  Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. Part 3: adult basic and   Front Physiol. 2019;10:116. doi:10.3389/fphys.2019.00116
             advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guide-  27.  Tulppo MP, Mäkikallio TH, Takala TE, Seppanen T, Huikuri HV.
             lines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovas-  Quantitative beat-to-beat analysis of heart rate dynamics during
             cular  care.  Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S366–S468. doi:   exercise.  Am J Physiol. 1996;271(1 PT 2):H244–H252. doi:
             10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916                       10.1152/ajpheart.1996.271.1.H244
           9.   Soar J, Böttiger BW, Carli P, et al. European Resuscitation Coun-  28.  Tulppo MP, Mäkikallio TH, Seppänen T, Laukkanen RT, Huikuri
             cil guidelines 2021: adult advanced life support.  Resuscitation.   HV. Vagal modulation of heart rate during exercise: effects of age
             2021;161:115–151. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.010  and physical fitness. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(2 Pt 2):H424–429.
          10.  Topjian AA, Raymond TT, Atkins D, et al. Part 4: pediatric ba-  29.  Huikuri HV, Mäkikallio  TH, Peng CK, Goldberger  AL, Hin-
             sic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association   tze U, Møller M. Fractal correlation properties of R-R interval
             guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency car-  dynamics and mortality in patients with depressed left ventric-
             diovascular care. Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S469–S523.   ular function after an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation.
             doi:10.1161/CIR.0000000000000901                   2000;101(1):47–53. doi:10.1161/01.CIR.101.1.47
          11.  Van de Voorde P, Turner NM, Djakow J, et al. European Resusci-  30.  White LA, Maxey BS, Solitro GF, Takei H, Conrad SA, Alexan-
             tation Council guidelines 2021: paediatric Life Support. Resuscita-  der JS. Efficacy and safety testing of a COVID-19 era emergency
             tion. 2021;161:327–387. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.015  ventilator in a healthy rabbit lung model.  BMC Biomed Eng.
          12.  Aziz K, Lee HC, Escobedo MB, et al. Part 5: neonatal resusci-  2022;4(1):2. doi:10.1186/s42490-022-00059-x
             tation: 2020  American Heart  Association Guidelines for car-  31.  Otten D, Liao MM, Wolken R, et al. Comparison of bag-valve-mask
             diopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care.   hand-sealing techniques in a simulated model. Ann Emerg Med.
             Circulation. 2020;142(16_suppl_2):S524–S550. doi:10.1161/CIR.   2014;63(1):6–12.e3. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.07.014
             0000000000000902                                32.  Sall FS, De Luca A, Pazart L, Pugin A, Capellier G, Khoury A.
          13.  Madar J, Roehr CC, Ainsworth S, et al. European Resuscitation   To intubate or not: ventilation is the question. A manikin-based
             Council guidelines 2021: newborn resuscitation and support of   observational  study.  BMJ  Open  Resp  Res.  2018;5(1):e000261.
             transition of infants at birth. Resuscitation. 2021;161:291–326.   doi:10.1136/bmjresp-2017-000261
             doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.014         33.  Culbreth RE, Gardenhire DS. Manual bag valve mask ventila-
          14.  Nielsen A,  Isbye  D,  Lippert  F, Rasmussen  L.  Basic  life  support   tion performance among respiratory therapists.  Heart Lung.
             and automated external defibrillator skills among ambulance per-  2021;50(3):471–475. doi:10.1016/j.hrtlng.2020.10.012
             sonnel: a manikin study performed in a rural low-volume ambu-  34.  American Heart Association. American Heart Association (AHA)
             lance setting. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2012;20(1):34.   requirement  on  use  of  feedback  devices  in  adult  CPR  training
             doi:10.1186/1757-7241-20-34                        courses. Published August 15, 2017. Accessed March 16, 2022.

          16  |  JSOM   Volume 24, Edition 3 / Fall 2024
   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23