Page 32 - JSOM Summer 2024
P. 32

TABLE 1  Patient Summary Details
                                        Ambient              Initial   Core body                     Evidence
                             Training   temperature         core body   temperature at   Cooling     of excess
           Patient Demographics environment  & RH, °F/%  WGBT, °F temperature, °F  ED arrival, °F  method  Disposition  motivation
             1   24-y-old   Ranger      71.4/92    70.4      107.5        98.1   Cold water  Discharged  Direct
                 female O2  School                                               immersion  same day  quote
             2   21-y-old male  Initial Entry   63/80  67.8  100.4*       98.5   Ice sheets;   Discharged  Inferred,
                 E1         Training                                             15 min    next day  confirmed
                                                                                                    with direct
                                                                                                    questioning
             3   33-y-old male  Ranger   62/74     58.2      105.4        98.1   Cold water  Discharged  Direct
                 E7         School                                               immersion;  next day  quote
                                                                                 10 min
             4   25-y-old male  Ranger   67/97     66.8      108.2       106.8   Ice sheets   Discharged  Direct
                 E4         Assessment                                           then active   4 days later quote
                            & Selection                                          water
                                                                                 lavage
             5   29-y-old   Ranger       75/95     73.5      106.8       102.6   Ice sheets  Discharged  Inferred,
                 female O3  Assessment                                                     next day  confirmed
                            & Selection                                                             with direct
                                                                                                    questioning
          *First core temperature was obtained after 15-min of ice sheet cooling.
          ED = emergency department; RH = relative humidity; WGBT = wet-bulb globe temperature index.

          Case 3                                             as one of the factors in the assessment process, adding to his
          In February 2022, a 33-year-old male SFC Ranger Candidate   motivation to excel.
          with no past heat injuries, who had arrived at Fort Moore less
          than 1 week before from a cold weather location, presented   Case 5
          to the ED after becoming incapacitated during a 12-mile ruck   In July 2022, a 29-year-old female CPT with recent antibiotic
          march. Ambient conditions were temperature 62°F, 74% RH,   treatment, who had arrived at Fort Moore less than one week
          and a WBGT of 58.2°F. He reported feeling weak and un-  earlier, presented to the ED after developing altered mental
          coordinated during the event and ultimately lost conscious-  status during a 5-mile run in Ranger Assessment and Selection.
          ness. Ranger School medics obtained a rectal temperature of   Ambient temperature was 75°F, 95% RH, and a WBGT of
          105.4°F and cooled the patient with cold water immersion.   73.5°F. During the event, she reported feeling weakness, dizzi-
          Core temperature taken by EMS 10-minutes post immersion   ness, and slight shortness of breath. She was eventually unable
          was noted as 98.1°F. The patient also complained of coughing   to run in a straight line, and ultimately unable to stand. The
          during the event and was found on ED-admission radiographs   patient was cooled per protocol with ice sheets. Initial core
          to have bilateral opacities suggestive of interstitial pneumonia.   temperature taken by EMS was noted as 106.8°F and then
          During an interview with the heat clinic provider, he noted that   102.6°F. The patient had altered mentation, which improved
          he wasn’t feeling well around mile 9 and, had it been a routine   during transport to the hospital. The patient desired a specific
          training event, he would have slowed down or even stopped   assignment within 75th Ranger Regiment. Successful comple-
          altogether. However, as the foot march is a pass/fail event at   tion of Ranger Assessment and Selection is a pre-requisite for
          Ranger School, with no opportunity to re-test if the standard   all personnel who serve in the Regiment and the patient ex-
          is not met, he continued to press on, as he was strongly moti-  pressed strong motivation to succeed.
          vated to earn the coveted Ranger tab.
                                                             Discussion
          Case 4
          In May 2022, a 25-year-old male SPC with no significant re-  The discussion of motivation as a contributing factor in cases
          ported medical history or past heat injuries, who had arrived   of EHS brings to light a compelling aspect of human behavior
          at Fort Moore one week earlier, presented to the ED after be-  that intersects with physiological limitations. One of the defin-
          coming incapacitated during a 5-mile run while training for   ing features of motivation in the context of EHS is its central
          pre-Ranger  Assessment and Selection.  Ambient conditions   role in pushing individuals to exceed their physiological limits.
          were temperature 67°F, 97% RH, and a  WBGT of 66.8°F.   Where a given individual might be very fit and very much “in
          During the event, he reported running at his normal pace of    tune” with his/ her physiological limits, the literature to date as
          7-min/mile, eventually feeling dizzy and uncoordinated, and   well as our present case series support the idea that the desire
          ultimately losing consciousness.  The patient was initially   to achieve specific tasks and goals can cause that person to
          cooled with ice sheets followed by active water lavage. Ini-  ignore those signals.
          tial core temperature taken by EMS was noted as 108.2°F. Per
          EMS, the patient had altered mentation and remained uncon-  Additionally, there are instances where individuals knowingly
          scious during transport to the hospital. Subsequent interview   disregard other risk factors, such as in the instance of the Sol-
          revealed that he had enlisted with the option to attend Special   dier (Case 3, above) who was aware of feeling ill at mile 9 of
          Forces Assessment and Selection but had failed to be selected   a 12-mile ruck march and disclosed later on that he would
          for further Special Forces Training. To participate in the pre-  have slowed down or stopped had he not been trying to earn a
          Ranger Assessment and Selection represented a second chance   Ranger tab. Instances like these place personnel at heightened
          for him “to be more than just an infantryman,” in his words.   risk of heat illness because of their determination to achieve
          Moreover, his finishing time on the run event would be used   specific objectives. These multifaceted scenarios suggest that

          30  |  JSOM   Volume 24, Edition 2 / Summer 2024
   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37