Page 76 - JSOM Winter 2023

33. Riedel S. Biological warfare and bioterrorism: a historical review. 43. Allister VJ, Marrs TC, Maynard RL. Novichok: A murderous nerve
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2004;17:400–406. agent attack in the UK. Clinical Toxicol. 2018;56:1093–1097.
34. Pitschmann V, Hon Z. Military importance of natural toxins and 44. Oliveira M, Mason-Buck G, Ballard D, et al. Biowarfare, bioter-
Their Analogs. Molecules. 2016;21:556. doi: 10.3390/molecules rorism and biocrime: A historical overview on microbial harmful
21050556. applications. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;314:110366. doi:10.1016/j.
35. Petroianu GA. Pharmacists Adolf Schall and Ernst Ratzlaff and forsciint.2020.110366.
the synthesis of tabun-like compounds: a brief history. Pharmazie. 45. Chai PR, Boyer EW, Al-Nahhas H, et al. Toxic chemical weapons
2014;69:780–784. of assassination and warfare: nerve agents VX and sarin. Toxicol
36. Lorke DE, Petroianu GA. The experimental oxime K027-A prom- Commun. 2017;1:21–23. doi:10.1080/24734306.2017.1373503.
ising protector from organophosphate pesticide poisoning. A re- 46. Chai PR, Hayes BD, Erickson TB, Boyer EW. Novichok agents:
view comparing K027, K048, pralidoxime, and obidoxime. Front a historical, current, and toxicological perspective. Toxicol Com-
Neurosci. 2019;13:427. mun. 2018;2:45–48. doi: 10.1080/24734306.2018.1475151.
37. Ganesan K, Raza SK, Vijayaraghavan R. Chemical warfare agents. 47. Gunderson CH, Lehmann CR, Sidell FR, Jabbari B. Nerve
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2:166–178. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406. agents: a review. Neurology. 1992;42(5):946–950. doi:10.1212/
68498. wnl.42.5.946.
38. Franca TCC, Kitagawa DAS, Cavalcante SFA, et al. Novichoks: 48. Wiercinski A, Jackson JP. Nerve Agents. StatPearls. 2023. Accessed
The dangerous fourth generation of chemical weapons. Int J Mol April 3, 2023. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK493158.
Sci. 2019;20:1222. doi: 10.3390/ijms20051222. 49. Ganesan K, Raza SK, Vijayaraghavan R. Chemical warfare agents.
39. Hrvat NM, Kovarik Z. Counteracting poisoning with chemical J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2010;2:166–78.
warfare nerve agents. Arh Hig Rada Toksikol. 2020;71:266–284. 50. Misik J. Military incapacitating agent Bz (3-Quinuclidinyl Benzi-
doi: 10.2478/aiht-2020-71-3459. late)–Past, present and future. Mil Med Sci Lett. 2013;82:115–9.
40. Darchini-Maragheh E, Balali-Mood M. Delayed complications 51. Marazziti D, Baroni S, Catena-Dell’Osso M, et al. Cognitive,
and long-term management of sulfur mustard poisoning: Recent psychological, and psychiatric effects of ionizing radiation ex-
advances by Iranian researchers (Part I of II). Iran J Med Sci. posure. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19:1864–1869. doi:10.2174/
2018;43:103–124. 092986712800099776.
41. Ali J. Chemical weapons and the Iran-Iraq war: A case study in 52. Belpomme D, Hardell L, Belyaev I, et al. Thermal and non-
noncompliance. The Nonproliferation Rev. 2001;8:43–58. thermal health effects of low intensity non-ionizing radiation: An
42. Nakagawa T, Tu AT. Murders with VX: Aum Shinrikyo in Japan international perspective. Environ Pollut. 2018;242:643–658.
and the assassination of Kim Jong-Nam in Malaysia. Forensic 53. Bushberg JT, Chou CK, Foster KR, et al. IEEE Committee on
Toxicol. 2018;36:542–544. Man and Radiation-COMAR technical information statement:
Health and safety issues concerning exposure of the general pub-
lic to electromagnetic energy from 5G wireless communications
networks. Health Phys. 2020;119:236–246.
54. Frey AH. Biological function as influenced by low-power mod-
ulated RF energy. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Techn. 1971;19:
153–64.
55. Kim J, Lee JK, Kim HG, et al. Possible effects of radiofrequency
electromagnetic field exposure on central nerve system. Biomol
Ther. 2019;27:265–275.
56. Lyon RF, Gramm J, Branagan B, Houck SC. Implications of neu-
rological directed-energy weapons for military medicine. J Spec
Oper Med. 2022;22:104–107.
57. Krishnan A. Military neuroscience and the coming age of neu-
rowarfare. Taylor & Francis Group; 2016.
58. Skopec R. The Frey effect of microwave sonic weapons. J Bio-
markers and Drug Discovery. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31579/
2642-9799/016.
59. Lin JC. The microwave auditory phenomenon. Proc IEEE. 1980;
68:67–73.
60. Song H, Konan LM, Cui J, et al. Nanometer ultrastructural
brain damage following low intensity primary blast wave ex-
posure. Neural Regen Res. 2018;13:1516–1519. doi:10.4103/
1673-5374.237110.
61. Hubler GK, Hoffman SW, Andreadis TD, DePalma RG. Pulsed
microwave energy transduction of acoustic phonon related brain
injury. Front Neurol. 2020;11:753.
62. Aristi G, Kamintsky L, Ross M, et al. Symptoms reported by Ca-
nadians posted in Havana are linked with reduced white mat-
ter fibre density. Brain Commun. 2022;4:fcac053. doi: 10.1093/
braincomms/fcac053.
63. Friedman A, Calkin C, Adams A, et al. Havana syndrome among
Canadian diplomats: brain imaging reveals acquired neurotoxic-
ity. MedRxiv. 2019;19007096.
64. Rauschenberg J, Nagel AM, Ladd SC, et al. Multicenter study
of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7
and 9.4 T. Investigative Radiology. 2014;49:249–259.
65. Yuh WT, Fisher DJ, Shields RK, et al. Phantom limb pain induced
in amputee by strong magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging.
1992;2:221–223.
66. Cook J. High-energy laser weapons since the early 1960s. Opt
Eng. 2013;52:021007.

PMID: 37976420; DOI: 10.55460/SX1S-ZO4J

74 | JSOM Volume 23, Edition 4 / Winter 2023