Page 57 - JSOM Winter 2023

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2015;58:79–91. 10.1016/j.neubiorev. 83. Millegan J, Denninger JW, Bui E, et al. A mind-body program
2015.06.018. for pain and stress management in active duty service mem-
67. Sousa N, Almeida OF. Disconnection and reconnection: the mor- bers and veterans. Psychol Serv. 2021;18(2):186–194. 10.1037/
phological basis of (mal)adaptation to stress. Trends Neurosci. ser0000376.
2012;35(12):742–751. 10.1016/j.tins.2012.08.006. 84. Mahncke HW, DeGutis J, Levin H, et al. A randomized clinical
68. Mac Donald CL, Barber J, Andre J, et al. 5-Year imaging sequelae trial of plasticity-based cognitive training in mild traumatic brain
of concussive blast injury and relation to early clinical outcome. injury. Brain. 2021;144(7):1994–2008. 10.1093/brain/awab202.
Neuroimage Clin. 2017;14:371–378. 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.02.005. 85. DeGraba TJ, Williams K, Koffman R, et al. Efficacy of an interdis-
69. Stone JR, Avants BB, Tustison NJ, et al. Functional and structural ciplinary intensive outpatient program in treating combat-related
neuroimaging correlates of repetitive low-level blast exposure traumatic brain injury and psychological health conditions. Front
in career breachers. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(23):2468–2481. Neurol. 2020;11:580182. 10.3389/fneur.2020.580182.
10.1089/neu.2020.7141. 86. Dean P, McNeil J. Breaking the stigma of behavior healthcare.
70. Robinson ME, McKee AC, Salat DH, et al. Positron emission https://www.socmil/Stigma/BTSA.html. Accessed February 8, 2023.
tomography of tau in Iraq and Afghanistan veterans with blast 87. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach
neurotrauma. Neuroimage Clin. 2019;21:101651. 10.1016/j.nicl. to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult
2019.101651. Clin Psychol. 1991;59(1):12–19. 10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12.
71. Edlow BL, Bodien YG, Baxter T, et al. Long-term effects of re- 88. Miller MR, DiBattista A, Patel MA, et al. A distinct metabolite sig-
peated blast exposure in united states special operations forces nature in military personnel exposed to repetitive low-level blasts.
personnel: a pilot study protocol. J Neurotrauma. 2022;39(19– Front Neurol. 2022;13:831792. 10.3389/fneur.2022.831792.
20):1391–1407. 10.1089/neu.2022.0030. 89. Vorn R, Edwards KA, Hentig J, et al. A pilot study of whole-blood
72. Maruta J, Jaw E, Modera P, Rajashekar U, Spielman LA, Gha- transcriptomic analysis to identify genes associated with repeti-
jar J. Frequency responses to visual tracking stimuli may be af- tive low-level blast exposure in career breachers. Biomedicines.
fected by concussion. Mil Med. 2017;182(S1):120–123. 10.7205/ 2022;10(3). 10.3390/biomedicines10030690.
MILMED-D-16-00093. 90. Shahim P, Politis A, van der Merwe A, et al. Time course and di-
73. Samadani U, Ritlop R, Reyes M, et al. Eye tracking detects dis- agnostic utility of NfL, tau, GFAP, and UCH-L1 in subacute and
conjugate eye movements associated with structural traumatic chronic TBI. Neurology. 2020;95(6):e623–e636. 10.1212/WNL.
brain injury and concussion. J Neurotrauma. 2015;32(8):548– 0000000000009985.
556. 10.1089/neu.2014.3687. 91. Abdelhak A, Foschi M, Abu-Rumeileh S, et al. Blood GFAP as an
74. Kawata K, Rubin LH, Lee JH, et al. Association of football emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders. Nat Rev
subconcussive head impacts with ocular near point of conver- Neurol. 2022;18(3):158–172. 10.1038/s41582-021-00616-3.
gence. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016;134(7):763–769. 10.1001/jama 92. Johnson VE, Stewart JE, Begbie FD, Trojanowski JQ, Smith DH,
ophthalmol.2016.1085. Stewart W. Inflammation and white matter degeneration persist
75. MacDonald CL, Barber J, Patterson J, et al. Comparison of for years after a single traumatic brain injury. Brain. 2013;136
clinical outcomes 1 and 5 years post-injury following combat (Pt 1):28–42. 10.1093/brain/aws322.
concussion. Neurology. 2021;96(3):e387–e398. 10.1212/WNL. 93. Hicks R, Giacino J, Harrison-Felix C, Manley G, Valadka A,
0000000000011089. Wilde EA. Progress in developing common data elements for
76. Edlow BL, Keene CD, Perl DP, et al. Multimodal characterization traumatic brain injury research: version two—the end of the be-
of the late effects of traumatic brain injury: a methodological over- ginning. J Neurotrauma. 2013;30(22):1852–1861. 10.1089/neu.
view of the late effects of traumatic brain injury project. J Neu- 2013.2938.
rotrauma. 2018;35(14):1604–1619. 10.1089/neu.2017.5457. 94. Silverberg ND, Iverson GL, members ABISIGMTTF, et al. The
77. Cifu DX. Clinical research findings from the long-term impact of American congress of rehabilitation medicine diagnostic criteria
military-relevant brain injury consortium-chronic effects of neu- for mild traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023;
rotrauma consortium (LIMBIC-CENC) 2013–2021. Brain Inj. 104(8):1343–1355. 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.036.
2022;36(5):587–597. 10.1080/02699052.2022.2033843. 95. Giza CC, Kutcher JS, Ashwal S, et al. Summary of evidence-based
78. Dennis EL, Baron D, Bartnik-Olson B, et al. ENIGMA brain guideline update: evaluation and management of concussion in
injury: framework, challenges, and opportunities. Hum Brain sports: report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the
Mapp. 2022;43(1):149–166. 10.1002/hbm.25046. American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2013;80(24):2250–
79. Roy MJ, Keyser DO, Rowe SS, et al. Methodology of the inves- 2257. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828d57dd.
tigating training associated blast pathology (INVICTA) study. 96. Silverberg ND, Iaccarino MA, Panenka WJ, et al. Management of
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022;22(1):317. 10.1186/s12874-022- concussion and mild traumatic brain injury: a synthesis of prac-
01807-2. tice guidelines. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;101(2):382–393.
80. United States Special Operations Command. SOFCAST. www. 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.10.179.
socom.mil/SOFcast. Accessed October 12, 2023. 97. McKee AC, Stein TD, Huber BR, et al. Chronic traumatic en-
81. Tanielian TL, Jaycox L. Invisible wounds of war: psychological cephalopathy (CTE): criteria for neuropathological diagnosis
and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist and relationship to repetitive head impacts. Acta Neuropathol.
recovery. RAND Corporation; 2008. 10.7249/MG720. 2023;145(4):371–394. 10.1007/s00401-023-02540-w.
82. United States Department of Defense. Department of Defense
Warfighter Brain Health Initiative: Strategy and Action Plan. PMID: 37851859; DOI: 10.55460/99QW-K0HG
2021: https://media.defense.gov. Accessed February 8, 2023.

Brain Health in U.S. Special Operations Forces | 55