Page 49 - JSOM Fall 2022

Conflict of Interest 19. Anderson GS, Litzenberger R, Plecas D. Physical evidence of po­
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare in relation lice officer stress. Policing. 2002;25:399–420.
to this article. 20. Leino TM, Selin R, Summala H, et al. Violence and psychological
distress among police officers and security guards. Occup Med.
2011;61:400–406.
Acknowledgments 21. Paoline EA. Taking stock: toward a richer understanding of po­
We are grateful to those who agreed to participate in the study lice culture. J Crim Justice. 2003;31:199–214.
despite interruption of their simulation training. We are also 22. Jonsson A, Segesten K. The meaning of traumatic events as de­
thankful for the assistance from the instructors who supported scribed by nurses in ambulance service. Accid Emerg Nurs. 2003;
the research during the collection phase, and for their evalua­ 11:141–152.
tion of the exercises and tasks accomplished. This study would 23. Reti T, De Terte I, Stephens C. Traumatic exposure, work­related
not have been possible without their contribution. stressors and gender as risk factors in the development of psycho­
logical distress for ambulance personnel. Traumatology. 2021;
28(1):46­55.
References 24. Lawn S, Roberts L, Willis E, et al. The effects of emergency
1. NATO Standardization Office. NATO Standard AJP­4.10. Sep­ medical service work on the psychological, physical, and social
tember 2019. https://www.coemed.org/files/stanags/01_AJP/AJP­ well­being of ambulance personnel: a systematic review of quali­
4.10_EDC_V1_E_2228.pdf Assessed 10 August 2022. tative research. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):348.
2. Hart SG. NASA­task load index (NASA­TLX); 20 years later. 25. Karch SJ, Lawson BD, Milam LS. Defining normal balance for
Hum Factors. 2006;50:904–908. army aviators [published correction appears in Mil Med. 2019
3. Grier RA. How high is high? A meta­analysis of NASA­TLX Jul 1;184(7­8):e374]. Mil Med. 2019;184(7­8):e296­e300.
global workload scores. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu 26. Cherry K. 11 signs you might be an overachiever. Verywell Mind.
Meet. 2015;59:1727–1731. 16 July 2020. https://www.verywellmind.com/are­you­an­over
4. Prytz E, Rybing J, Jonson C-O. Workload differences across com­ achiever­4580606. Accessed 14 July 2022.
mand levels and emergency response organizations during a ma­ 27. Mind Tools. Managing high achievers: harnessing top perform­
jor joint exercise. J Emerg Manag. 2016;14:289–297. ers’ full potential. Mind Tools; 2021. https://www.mindtools.
5. Garcia-Mas A, Ortega E, Ponseti J, et al. Workload and cortisol com/pages/article/managing­high­achievers.htm. Accessed 14 July
levels in helicopter combat pilots during simulated flights. Rev 2022.
Andal Med Deport. 2016;9:7–11. 28. Guidry CM, Medina MS, Bennett KK, et al. The other side of
6. Chang T, Beshay Y, Hollinger T, et al. Comparisons of stress “challenging learners”: strategies for teaching and precepting
physiology of providers in real­life resuscitations and virtual the overachiever and high performer. Am J Health Syst Pharm.
reality­simulated resuscitations. Simul Healthc. 2019;14:104–112. 2021;79(2):17­22.
7. Taveniers J, Smeets T, Van Ruysseveldt J, et al. The risk of being 29. Strange JB Jr. The high performer track: an analysis on infantry
shot at: stress, cortisol secretion, and their impact on memory training methods. March 2020. MSc Thesis, Naval Postgraduate
and perceived learning during reality­based practice for armed School. March 2020. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1114378
officers. Int J Stress Manag. 2011;18:113–132. .pdf. Accessed 14 July 2022.
8. Lieberman HR, Bathalon GP, Falco CM, et al. The fog of war: 30. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences.
decrements in cognitive performance and mood associated with 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988.
combat­like stress. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005;76:C7–14. 31. Pluntke U, Gerke S, Sridhar A, et al. Evaluation and classifica-
9. Magnusson S. Similarities and differences in psychophysiological tion of physical and physiological stress in firefighters using heart
reactions between simulated and real air­to­ground missions. Int rate variability. Presented at the 41st Annual International Con­
J Aviat Psychol. 2002;12:49–61. ference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
10. Dahlström N, Nählinder S. Mental workload in aircraft and sim­ (EMBC), Berlin, Germany; 23–27 July 2019.
ulator during basic civil aviation training. Int J Aviat Psychol. 32. Kotwal RS, Howard JT, Orman JA, et al. The effect of a golden
2009;19:309–325. hour policy on the morbidity and mortality of combat casualties.
11. Friberg M, Jonson CO, Jaeger V, Prytz E. The effects of stress on JAMA Surg. 2016;151(1):15–24.
tourniquet application and CPR performance in layperson and 33. Aydin A, Bilge S, Eryilmaz M. Safest light in a combat area while
professional civilian populations. Hum Factors. 2021 May 26: performing intravenous access in the dark. BMJ Mil Health.
187208211021255. 2018;164(5):343­346.
12. Elthammar L. Manual Defence Psychiatry – Tour of Duty and 34. Bilge S, Bilge M, Cevik E, et al. A study on the tactical safety
Stress. Stockholm: Swedish Armed Forces; 2008. of endotracheal intubation under darkness. Mil Med. 2017;182
13. Beaton R, Murphy S, Johnson C, et al. Exposure to duty­related (7):e1722–e1725.
incident stressors in urban firefighters and paramedics. J Trauma 35. Nindl BC, Billing DC, Drain JR, et al. Perspectives on resilience
Stress. 1998;11:821–828. for military readiness and preparedness: report of an international
14. Beaton R, Murphy S, Johnson C, et al. Coping responses and military physiology roundtable. J Sci Med Sport. 2018;21(11):
posttraumatic stress symptomatology in urban fire service per­ 1116–1124.
sonnel. J Trauma Stress. 1999;12:293–308. 36. Varley-Campbell J, Cooper C, Wilkerson D, et al. Sex­specific
15. Kales S, Soteriades E, Christophi C, et al. Firefighters an on­duty changes in physical performance following military training: a
deaths from coronary heart disease: a case control study. Environ systematic review. Sports Med. 2018;48(11):2623–2640.
Health. 2003;2(1):14. 37. Conkright WR, O’Leary TJ, Wardle SL, et al. Sex differences in
16. Kales S, Soteriades E, Christophi C, et al. Emergency duties and the physical performance, physiological, and psycho­cognitive re­
deaths from heart disease among firefighters in the United states. sponses to military operational stress. Eur J Sport Sci. 2022;22
N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1207–1215. (1):99–111.
17. Bar-On R, Brown JM, Kirkcaldy BD, et al. Emotional expres­ 38. Szalma J, Hancock PA, eds. Performance Under Stress. London,
sion and implications for occupational stress: an implication of UK: CRC Press; 2008.
the Emotional expression Quotient Inventory (EGI). Pers Individ 39. Eriksson K. Vårddidaktik [Care Didactics]. Gothenburg: Almqvist
Diff. 2000;28:1107–1118. & Wiksell. 1985.
18. Anshel HM. A conceptual model and implications for coping 40. Ekstedt M, Kenttä G. Demands of performance, engagement and
with stressful events in police work. Crim Just Behav. 2000;27: endurance are broadly the same in working life as in elite sports.
375–400. Lakartidningen. 2011;108(36):1684–1687.

Stressful Simulation Training in Swedish Special Forces | 47