Page 106 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 106

Our Army requires its Soldiers to be current and competent in   direct involvement in patient care, high­level interpersonal and
          their specialty skills. Corollary examples include the need for   motivational skills, commitment to high­quality practice, and
          an airborne infantryman to conduct individual and collective   empowerment of others. 9
          training standards for airborne operations or for pilots to reg­
          ularly fly in daytime and nighttime, operating in both instru­  Physicians should have the expertise and credibility with their
          ment­flight and night vision–enhanced conditions to maintain   subordinates that command – not demand – respect. Phrases
          competency and currency of flight status.          like “lead from the front,” “lead by example,” and “servant
                                                             leadership” are commonly used to describe military leadership,
          Acceptance of specialty bonuses requires the MC officer to   yet they have little applicability among their fellow physicians
          be competent and current in their specialty, but there are no   when MC officer­leaders do not engage, maintain credentials,
          specified, required benchmarks beyond board certification.   or practice their specialties.
          Recently published by the Army Medical Command, the new
          Individual Clinical Task List (ICTL) attempts to define specific   During the Iraq Conflict, some general officers such as General
          skills and procedures required for competence based on medi­  Stanley McChrystal and General James Mattis accompanied
          cal specialty. While a work in progress, it is unclear if it will re­  troops in squad level units as observers. They were prepared
          quire MC officers in administrative, operational, or leadership   to function as infantrymen should the requirement arise. 10,11  It
          positions to meet these standards. Often the sole requirement   is unclear if senior military medical leaders could function as
          for remaining a credentialed provider in Army medical treat­  practicing physicians at this basic level.
          ment facilities is to practice a mere 40 hours per year.
                                                             While individuals may be concerned about leadership and the
          There are issues with ownership of the readiness component   responsibility which comes with it, commanders are rarely re­
          and challenges to improving combat casualty survival.  While   lieved because of performance, barring ethical, legal, or publi­
                                                    5
          readiness and ensuring operational billets are filled are the   cized medical issues. MC leaders who do not practice medicine
          core elements of military medicine, there is little emphasis and   are not exposed to the same risks as the clinically active MC
          no apparent requirement for these physicians to meet clinical   officers they lead, such as the federal tort claims act, qual­
          competency requirements.                           ity improvement, and patient surveys. Physicians are held ac­
                                                             countable for poor decisions made by officers/administrators
                                                             who are not affected by those decisions including logistics, au­
          Leader
                                                             tomation, and contracting. Medical leaders are also burdened
          With few exceptions, MC officers were the leaders in the   by the unending phenomenon of building and increasing ad­
          AMEDD until 1997 with the advent of branch immaterial   ministrative staff. Often, this is at the expense of clinical posi­
          command. This opened the competition for commands and   tions, further decreasing the number of practicing physicians
          flag rank to all of the AMEDD corps. Given that some corps   and nurses in a system that the Government Accounting Office
          do not practice clinical medicine or stop practicing it early in   (GAO) deems very inefficient. 12
          their career lifecycles, MC officers may have felt the need to
          compete in a similar fashion.                      It is the rare senior military medical leader who maintains clin­
                                                             ical practice as they progress in rank. Working a shift in their
          Many who aspire to be general officers place emphasis on   respective clinics, operating room, or emergency department
          being operationally, technically, and tactically proficient. In   and utilizing the numerous electronic health care records, labs,
          civilian medicine, clinical and academic excellence are sim­  radiology systems, and administrative and consulting systems
          ilarly  cited  as  the  ultimate  goals.  However,  competition  for   that are stand­alone and not interactive, would give them first­
          commands and flag rank in the Army MC compromises the   hand experience with issues that are not necessarily appreci­
          importance of clinical and academic competence and currency.   ated at the command­suite level. This is not to suggest that the
          The reasons physicians avoid competing for these leadership   leaders are not engaged, but there is a substantial difference
          assignments are complex and varied, but the present promo­  between an email presence, night rounding, mass town hall
          tion structure and professional military education require­  meetings, and a physical presence on the ground in which the
          ments create substantial barriers for physicians to continue   multiple inefficient administrative systems meet the patient in
          the active clinical practice of medicine. MC officers who seek   the clinical environment.
          leadership assignments often do so out of a sense of duty and
          obligation, not necessarily for individual ambition. This does
          not however, justify the absence of a requirement for clinical   The Way Forward
          excellence.                                        1.  Make clinical practice matter. Ensure that all medical pro­
                                                               viders including physicians, nurses, physician assistants,
          There is a growing body of evidence that suggests health care   medics, etc. continue to practice in their chosen fields.
          works best when physicians are in leadership roles.  In the civil­  Make it relevant and make it the standard.
                                                6
          ian community, physician leaders were traditionally selected on   2.  Emphasize the need for ICTL training for everyone. If un­
          the basis of their national prominence and excellence as master   available at the local military training facilities (MTFs),
          clinicians, eminent clinical investigators, and revered educators. 7  seek out military relevant training in the civilian commu­
                                                               nity. Consider aligning these requirements with specialty
          Many believe effective clinical leadership is essential for con­  bonuses.
          sumers of health care to achieve optimal health outcomes and   3.  Perform an evidence­based evaluation of nonmedical train­
          experience optimal medical care.  While currently no standard   ing requirements and eliminate those that have little value.
                                   8
          definition of clinical leadership exists, common themes men­  4.  Build clinical practice into staffing models for all leader­
          tioned in the literature include clinical excellence and expertise,   ship, administrative, and operational positions.


          102  |  JSOM   Volume 22, Edition 3 / Fall 2022
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111