Page 109 - JSOM Fall 2022
P. 109

In 2012, the Academy of Sciences in the United Kingdom re­  cases were the sudden onset of a perceived loud sound, which
              leased a report classifying neuroscience applications into two   many described as “screeching, chirping, clicking, or pierc­
              broad camps: performance  enhancement and performance   ing,” an intense pressure sensation or vibration in the head,
                                                                                                         18
                       11
              degradation.  Performance enhancement tools enhance cogni­  and pain in the ear or more diffusely in the head.  Patients
              tive performance, sensory perception, memory, concentration,   had acute symptoms of dizziness, fatigue, impaired balance,
              motivation,  and  situational  awareness  while  negating  sleep   headache, and impaired concentration, but many symptoms
                                                                                                18
              deprivation, stress, pain, fear, and other negative emotions.   became chronic years after initial onset.  The directional and
              Performance  degradation  tools  are  more  likely  to  be  weap­  location­specific details in the patients’ histories are unusual
              onized and seek to degrade brain capabilities by impairing   and “unlike any disorder reported in the neurological or gen­
              performance, incapacitating, or potentially killing. There are   eral medical literature,” providing the basis for increased sus­
              four categories of neuroweapons: (1) drugs, or neuropharma­  picions of DEWs. 18
              cology; (2) bugs, specifically, neurological bioweapons; (3)
              waves, short for electromagnetic and sound waves; and (4)   In recognition of the increased incidence of the non­traumatic
              bytes, or information attacks (direct or indirect) on the brain.    neurological impairments and potential implications to SOF,
                                                             5
              The recent cases of neurological AHIs mentioned in this article   USSOCOM defined and provided guidance in the treatment
                                                                                      2
              are presumably from waves in the form of directed energy,   of UBIs, now termed AHIs.  The release of this guidance has
              sonic, and ultrasonic weapons that use intense energy to inca­  begun an important, much­needed dialogue within the medi­
                                                                                              6
              pacitate, damage, or destroy. 12                   cal community on treatment for AHI.  However, the growing
                                                                 concern of a non­lethal neuroweapon, such as DEWs, requires
              Although such weapons may violate the intent of UN treaties,   the development of a comprehensive medical defense strategy.
              currently most neuroweapons fall into a legal and regulatory   Such a strategy would focus on prevention, recognition, and
              gap because they do not fit either the Biological and Toxin   treatment, similar to that of chemical, biological, radiologi­
              Weapons Convention (BTWC) or the Chemical Weapons Con­  cal, nuclear, and explosive materials (CBRNE) and hazard­
              vention (CWC).  This growing neurowarfare  threat applies   ous environmental exposures and requires military medical
                          13
              to all military forces, but the large global footprint of SOF in   personnel to be the forefront of these efforts. Even though
              more contested areas means they are uniquely engaged and   USSOCOM has initiated the efforts in treating AHIs, the rec­
              exposed to new forms of warfare.  Because of their special­  ommended strategy proposed here is applicable to all military
                                         14
              ized skills, SOF would be considered high­value targets for po­  medical personnel treating warfighters at risk.
              tential adversaries. Therefore, SOF medical personnel should
              be especially prepared to address the increasing potential neu­
              roweapon threat because its implications and resultant stakes   Medical Defense Strategy of Neuroweapons
              are significant.                                   Defense strategies countering WMD have been divided into
                                                                 active and passive measures. Active measures include “defeat”
                                                                 and  “deter,”  but  these  require  technical  knowledge  of  the
              A New Domain of Casualties
                                                                 weapon, the ability to detect the weapon, and intel regarding
              The incidents in Cuba, dubbed the “Havana Syndrome,” are   who is employing the technology. Passive defense measures in­
              not isolated events. A similar incident occurred in Guangzhou,   clude “protect,” “respond,” and “recover.” These measures
                          15
              China, in 2017.  As many as 200 Americans, including pets   primarily address the consequences of employment, which are
              and children, have developed AHI symptoms after serving in at   suboptimal in minimizing casualties but the best course of ac­
              least fifteen different countries, including the United States.    tion in a situation with such uncertainty. 19
                                                            16
              However, many did not immediately discuss their health con­
                                                                        20
              cerns as they struggled to understand what was happening.   Krishnan  proposed a doctrine for neurodefense that includes
              Eventually, many victims independently sought medical care,   principles (detection, deterrence, reaction, and adaptation) in
              and speculation began to circulate about the cause of these   close alignment with WMD defense concepts, but a significant
              symptoms. Greater awareness of neuroweapon threats could   portion of his theory relies on knowing the presence, type, and
              improve efficiency of case identification, allowing for faster   user of neuroweapons. Unfortunately, at the present time, the
              medical intervention.                              specific  etiology  of recent  AHI  cases  is mere  speculation  or
                                                                 currently classified, making employment prevention strategies
              This information began to surface in the public domain only   difficult to develop or discuss. This forces a passive or reactive,
              in the past few years, and there have been several theories sur­  rather than proactive or active, medical management response,
              rounding the origin of this mystery, including sonic weapons,   like those to unknown chemical weapons. For that reason, the
              microwaves, insecticides, crickets, and everyday aches and   following recommended medical approach to potential neu­
              pains, to name a few.  Some of these theories corroborate what   roweapons parallels counter­WMD passive defense strategies.
                              6
              victims report, whereas others claim these individuals are not   Although no current cases have occurred on military battle­
              “victims” but rather suffer from “mass hysteria.”  However,   fields but rather appear to have been directed at diplomatic
                                                    17
              a State Department–funded investigative team of neuroscien­  outposts and other government buildings, including the White
              tists concluded the cause was most likely an intentional, di­  House, it is important to consider a strategy applicable to
              rected use of a neuroweapon.  Then, in 2020, the National   combat missions.
                                     4
              Academy of Sciences (NAS) released an extensive report that
              suggested the most plausible etiology is some form of DEW. 18  Prevent and Protect
                                                                 Protection and prevention require an understanding of the
              In addition to providing a thorough analysis on etiology, the   threat, development of protective measures based on that un­
              NAS report documents the medical effects experienced by the   derstanding, and detection of the threat to employ protective
              AHI patients. The most common symptoms from the Havana   measures. Body armor was developed and refined to counter

                                                                Neurological Directed-Energy Weapons for Military Medicine  |  105
   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114