Page 44 - 2020 JSOM Winter
P. 44

bleed-to-death time of 300 seconds. The rate fell into three   387 ± 66.6mmHg and 995 ± 479.6mL, respectively. The mean
          levels: uncontrolled, partly controlled during mechanical ap-  field tourniquet trial time was 2.8 ± 0.9 minute (Table 2). Ease
          plication of a tourniquet, and controlled when an application   of use in field tourniquet trials was either 4 or 5, with a me-
          succeeded. The manikin was laid supine on a bed sheet at gur-  dian of 4.
          ney height atop two footlockers stacked atop a flatbed cart.
                                                             TABLE 2  Mean Results of Trials
          The manikin autonomously measured times (time to stop                 Time to Stop
          bleeding and trial time). It determined patient status (bleeding   Trial Time,   Bleeding,   Pressure,   Blood Loss,
          or stable), trial status (“go” [satisfactory] or not), tourniquet   Trial Type  min*  min*  mmHg*  mL*
          placement (good or incorrect), pressure (in mmHg and cate-  Field   2.8 ± 0.9  1.9 ± 0.8  387 ± 66.6  995 ± 479.6
                                                              tourniquet
          gory [good or loose]), and blood loss. The caregiver collected
          ease-of-use data (1, very difficult; 2, difficult; 3, neutral; 4,   Conversion   3.1 ± 0.9  1.7 ± 1.1  247 ± 117.6 467 ± 264.8
                                                              (pneumatic
          easy; or 5, very easy) and test times (start, end, time of day).   tourniquet)
          Donning time was not measured directly but occurred in the   *Mean ± standard deviation.
          tourniquet  trial  during  the  time  to  stop  bleeding.  Donning
          delay times were separately calculated as differences in mean   In conversion trials, status results showed that all 30 pneu-
          times to stop bleeding compared with the control group. Each   matic tourniquet uses were effective to stabilize the patient.
          test had a moment in both trials when bleeding was controlled,   Fifteen pneumatic tourniquets were placed at the correct site;
          and the time periods thereafter within a trial were called tour-  15 were placed incorrectly. Pressures applied by pneumatic
          niquet trial posttime or conversion trial posttime. The care-  tourniquets were sufficient in 21 uses and insufficient in 9
          giver assessed bleeding control and secured the tourniquet   uses. Overall, 15 trials were satisfactory and 15 were unsat-
          during these periods. Other calculations included posttime   isfactory (incorrect placement in 15, of which 9 were loose).
          (trial time minus time to stop bleeding) and test blood loss   The mean pressure and blood loss were 247 ± 117.6mmHg
          (sum of tourniquet trial and its conversion trial). Test num-  and 467 ± 264.8mL, respectively. The mean conversion trial
          ber, a surrogate of accrued healthcare experience, assessed test   time was 3.1 ± 0.9 minute. Ease of conversion varied between
          time. The data collection time (test time minus the sum of its   3 and 5, with a median of 4. Conversion trials began with
          trial times) was a surrogate of healthcare recordkeeping.  the field tourniquet in place at a pressure that had controlled
                                                             hemorrhage, yet the transilluminated manikin wound served
          Descriptive statistics were used to portray results (Excel 2003;   as feedback that signified uncontrolled hemorrhage.
          www.microsoft.com). Analyses were performed using SAS, v.
          9.4 (SAS Institute; www.sas.com). Continuous variables were   Control Group:
          tested for normality. Normally distributed data were presented   No Personal Protective Equipment (PPE0)
          as mean ± standard deviation (SD), and analysis of variance   Field tourniquet trial status results showed that all 10 tour-
          was used with the  F test to assess mean differences among   niquet uses without PPE stabilized the patient. There were
          groups, followed by pairwise comparisons with post hoc Bon-  nine satisfactory tourniquet results with correct placement
          ferroni correction. Non-normally distributed data were pre-  and sufficient pressure. There was one unsatisfactory result,
          sented as median and interquartile ranges. Nonparametric   with incorrect placement as well as insufficient pressure. The
          methods for testing whether samples originated from the same   median field tourniquet pressure was 372mmHg. The median
          distribution were used. The Kruskal-Wallis test by ranks was   blood loss was 403mL (Figure 1). Ease of use in field tourni-
          used for comparing the groups for time data, followed by a   quet trials in the PPE0 group was either 4 or 5, with a median
          Mann-Whitney test for post hoc comparisons. A coefficient of   of 5.
          determination, denoted as r , was used as the portion of the
                                2
          variance in the dependent variable that was predictable from   Without PPE, all 10 conversions to pneumatic tourniquet sta-
          the independent variable. Significance was determined at the   bilized the patient. However, only 5 of these 10 conversions
          two-sided P < .05 level.                           were satisfactory and placed at the correct site. Six of the 10
                                                             conversions had sufficient pressure, and 4 of the 10 conver-
          Results                                            sions were applied too loosely. Median conversion pressure
                                                             and blood loss were 266mmHg and 365mL, respectively. Ease
          Test Results                                       of conversion was 4 in each conversion trial in PPE0.
          The first test time lasted 6.0 minutes. On average, test times
          did not change significantly [in a power law of practice: test   PPE1: Personal Protective Equipment Group 1
          time = 6.0863 × (test number) −0.026 ; r  = 0.0135]. Test blood   The field tourniquet trial status results for PPE1 showed that
                                       2
          loss averaged 1462 ± 554.5mL and ranged from a minimum   all 10 tourniquet uses stabilized the patient and had sufficient
          of 624mL to a maximum of 2391mL.                   pressures. Nine tourniquets were placed at the correct site,
                                                             with satisfactory results. One tourniquet was placed incor-
          Trials of Tourniquet Application and Conversion    rectly with unsatisfactory results. In PPE1, median tourniquet
          In field tourniquet trials, results showed that all 30 uses were   pressure and blood loss were 386mmHg and 1234mL, respec-
          effective in bleeding control to stabilize the patient. Field   tively. Ease of field tourniquet use in PPE1 was either 4 or 5,
          tourniquets were placed correctly in 28 of 30 uses and incor-  with a median of 4.
          rectly twice. Pressures applied by tourniquets were sufficient
          in  29  uses  and  loose  in  1.  Overall,  there  were  satisfactory   In conversion to pneumatic tourniquet use, patient status
          results in 28 uses, with 2 unsatisfactory results involving in-  results showed that all PPE1 conversions stabilized the pa-
          correct placement both times, compounded by insufficient   tient. Four conversions were satisfactory. There was incor-
          pressure in 1 case. The mean pressure and blood loss were    rect placement in six conversions, three of which were also


          42  |  JSOM   Volume 20, Edition 4 / Winter 2020
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49