Page 86 - JSOM Summer 2020
P. 86

known  bleeding  or  clotting  abnormalities,  circulation  prob-  teeth (clicks), or circumferential wraps (nearest 90°) at occlu-
          lems, pain syndromes, peripheral neuropathies, connective   sion and completion were recorded. Occlusion was defined
          tissue disorders, or conditions counter to the positioning re-  as loss of audible Doppler pulse from the dorsal pedal artery
          quired for thigh use.                              (Ultrasonic Doppler Flow Detector Model 811 with 9.5MHz
                                                             adult flat probe; Parks Medical Electronics, www.parksmed.
          Tourniquets were applied to two thigh models. One was a   com). Occlusion was hands off for the Tac RMT but held for
          57.5cm circumference, 20% synthetic ballistic gel cylinder   the others. Completion was defined as occluded with hands
          (Gel, Clear Ballistics;  clearballistics.com) suspended via a   off  with  the  windlass  rod  secured  at  a  rotation  beyond  the
          rod through the 2.54cm-diameter central stainless steel tub-  occlusion position (C-A-T7 and SOFTTW), one click past oc-
          ing. 5,7,8  The other was two 5mm-thick yoga mats (Mats, 61cm   clusion (Tac RMT), or the end of the SWATT secured under a
          x 173cm, 1002569059, Home Depot, homedepot.com) rolled   previous wrap. For applications that were not completed, the
          one around the other with a 48.0cm circumference and sus-  final pressure; number of turns, clicks, or wraps; and the rea-
          pended via a 1.2cm-diameter metal rod through the center.  son for incompletion were recorded (applier inability, recipient
                                                             discomfort, or other). For secured, occlusion, and completion
          Tourniquet Appliers                                data points, a 5 second pause occurred before moving onward.
          Inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, willingness to watch   Tourniquets were removed 5 seconds after completion. The
          application videos, 9-11  practice applying tourniquets with   recipients sat as in Phase 2. Because we realized appliers had
          technique feedback and real-time pressure data, and a dom-  knelt in Phase 2, appliers stood in Phase 3. Applications were
          inant-hand weight pull > 9kg. Exclusion criteria were condi-  videoed.
          tions counter to tourniquet application (hand, wrist, elbow, or
          shoulder injuries).                                Tourniquet Applications
                                                             Nonelastic tourniquet application technique consisted of a
          Applier Pulling Force                              tourniquet-holding location above the redirect buckle and
          To determine single-arm downward pulling force, increasing   a strap-pulling direction downward, tangential to the limb
          weight increments of 4.54kg were attached to a C-A-T7 strap,   at the redirect buckle.  Appliers pulled with their dominant
                                                                               8
          which was placed over a smooth metal rod (1.2cm-diameter).   hand. Nonelastic tourniquets were not replaced unless a prob-
          Seated appliers pulled down on the free end of the strap with   lem occurred. A new SWATT was used by each applier. Each
          encouragement to engage their entire upper body strength and   SWATT application consisted of a minimally stretched 450°
          weight.                                            wrap followed by fully stretched wraps through occlusion and
                                                             completion.
          Three-Phases
          This study used thighs and tourniquet applications with the   Statistical Analysis
          following clothing conditions under the tourniquets: bare skin   For thigh applications, the order of tourniquet and clothing
          (Bare), scrubs (Scrubs), United States Military Army Combat   condition were randomized to avoid a potential order effect.
          Uniform (Uniform), and compression tights (Tights). For each   Double data entry with crosscheck was used for written data
          condition involving clothing, the under-tourniquet-pressure   and organizing pressure data from LoggerPro into Microsoft
                                                                                                            ®
          was measured with the bladder at skin (Scrubs Skin, Uniform   Office Excel 2003 (Microsoft Corp., www.microsoft.com). Be-
          Skin, Tights Skin) or thigh model surface (Scrubs Skin, Uni-  cause the bladder was not directly visible under clothing and
          form Skin) and at clothing surface (Scrubs Clothing, Uniform   could be other than under the center of SWATT wraps, pres-
          Clothing, Tights Clothing).                        sure data was validated before analysis: points were removed
                                                             for video-detectable evidence of bladder location problems
          Phase 1  investigated  clothing influence  on pressure  effects   or physiologically incorrect values. Graphing and statistical
          of controlled force application. A Tac RMT (0.1000kg) was   analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism, version 7.04
          draped over bare or clothed, thighs or thigh models. Strap   for Windows (GraphPad Software Inc., www.graphpad.com)
          ends were joined together (C-clamp, 0.0938kg) and had   and with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 26 (IBM
          4.54kg weights attached by carabiners (rope plus three car-  Corp., www.ibm.com). Nonlinear curve fitting (least squares
          abiners, 0.23761kg) at 20 second intervals for total applied   and extra sum-of-squares F test), paired t test, one-way re-
          forces from 4 to 271N (0.95 to 61lbf). The inflated bladder   peated measures analysis of variance analysis (ANOVA), two-
          was 180° from the downward hanging weights. Recipients   way ANOVA, and two-way repeated measures ANOVA were
          (n=5) lay so the medial mid-thigh was upward.      used for pressure data. Values in text are medians, minimums
                                                             to maximums. χ  test and Fisher’s exact test were used for con-
                                                                          2
          Phase 2 investigated clothing influence on tourniquet appli-  tingency data. Statistical significance was set at p≤.05.
          cation and secured pressure (ability to pull tight and secure
          strap, n=15 appliers on thighs). Only nonelastic tourniquets   Results
          were involved. For  thighs, recipients  sat upright, thigh par-
          allel to the floor, lower leg at a right angle to the thigh, and   Recipients and Appliers
          attempted to maintain a relaxed thigh. Applications were vid-  For recipient and applier information, see Table 1.
          eoed. For thigh models, 22.70kg was attached for 20 seconds
          to the end of the model-encircling tourniquet strap.  Phase 1: Hanging Weights
                                                             Controlled-force-application triplicates had little pressure vari-
          Phase 3 investigated clothing influence on the complete tour-  ance (coefficient of variation: thighs 1.38%, 0.03 to 8.51%,
          niquet application process and pressures (n=15 appliers). Se-  thigh models 1.26%, 0.03 to 6.57%). This was a low noise
          cured pressures, occlusion pressures, completion pressures,   system suitable for answering the physics question: Can cloth-
          and the number of windlass 180° turns (nearest 45°), ladder   ing cause a pressure response difference?


          84  |  JSOM   Volume 20, Edition 2 / Summer 2020
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91