Page 127 - JSOM Summer 2020
P. 127

types of fluid used (blood vs crystalloids), and resuscitation   increasingly compact and mobile ultrasound devices with suf-
              targets. In addition, there is limited evidence to support a   ficient image quality to guide vascular access have been devel-
              safe time limit on this intervention. The theoretical downside   oped, the authors consider ultrasound an indispensable tool
              to prolonged permissive hypotension is decreased end organ   for placing any large-bore vascular access and a requirement
              perfusion and its sequelae. This is exemplified in a report of   for arterial access for REBOA. This view is supported by a
              casualties from World War II with extremity injuries and 6 to   joint statement from the American College of Surgeons Com-
              7 hours of shock before reaching medical care. Despite ade-  mittee on Trauma and the American College of Emergency
              quate blood resuscitation, the patients never recovered from   Physicians regarding clinical use of REBOA. 27
              their prolonged shock.  In a pig model of a blast injury, pro-
                               14
              longed permissive hypotension (resuscitation to SBP 80mmHg)   The patient’s pattern of injury highlights multiple challenges
              resulted in death of all animals after 209 minutes.  Most pre-  for REBOA including the theoretical dangers of prehospital
                                                    15
              hospital studies are in robust trauma networks with prehospi-  placement. While some organizations are advocating for pre-
              tal times of 60 minutes or less. 16,17  The Trauma Hemostasis and   hospital REBOA placement, caution must be exercised. In this
              Oxygenation Research (THOR) Network attempts to account   case, ongoing tactical concerns prohibited evacuation for 2
              for these many confounding variables in its recommendations   hours. It is the authors’ opinion that REBOA should only be
              on hypotensive resuscitation.  For our patient, ongoing tacti-  placed when surgical care is immediately available.
                                    18
              cal concerns led to the inability to immediately evacuate the pa-
              tient. Two hours and thirty minutes elapsed from time of injury   At the FRST, A Zone 3 placement was chosen due to the lack
              until arrival at the FRST. Ranger medics targeted a palpable   of obvious intra-abdominal hemorrhage, as prolonged use of
              radial pulse and transfused a total of 10 units of whole blood   REBOA in Zone 1 would prolong hepatic, renal, and intes-
              before and during transport to surgical care.      tinal ischemia, all of which would likely have worsened an
                                                                 already massive physiologic insult. Movement of the occlusion
              Despite receiving 10 units of prehospital blood, the patient ar-  balloon to the most distal site allowed by the patient’s status
              rived to a forward surgical team in extremis. Given his mech-  and pattern of injury should be a top priority, particularly in
              anism of injury with obvious pelvic trauma, a Zone 3 REBOA   cases where prolonged or repeated aortic occlusion is needed.
              was placed via the left common femoral artery with immediate   While the patient did have an extensive pelvic injury, the need
              improvement in his hemodynamics.                   for RLE amputation could not be definitively determined at
                                                                 the Role 2. The right common femoral artery was also ex-
              REBOA was first described during the Korean War but was   posed within the zone of injury and had a visible subadven-
              largely unutilized in trauma until the last decade. Its use has   titial hematoma and visible luminal compromise consistent
              been described in current combat operations. 19,20  The lack of   with dissection or other blunt injury. As a result, access for
              effective prehospital solutions for noncompressible torso hem-  REBOA was achieved in the left common femoral artery. In
              orrhage has brought this technology back to the forefront of   cases where one lower limb is clearly nonviable, the side of the
              many discussions on battlefield resuscitation and combat ca-  nonviable limb should be accessed as it mitigates the clinical
              sualty care. One unsettled issue regarding REBOA is the time   consequences of any distal thromboembolic complications.
              limit it can be safely used prior to achieving surgical hemo-
              stasis. Partial REBOA, endovascular variable aortic control   Conclusion
              (EVAC), and intermittent REBOA  are strategies designed  to
              mitigate the sequelae of distal ischemia and ischemia/reperfu-  This case of a severely injured soldier illustrates several novel
              sion injury. 21–24  At the Role 2 facility, we used intermittent RE-  and extreme techniques including far forward “buddy transfu-
              BOA, where the aortic balloon was deflated and then reinflated   sions,” intermittent REBOA, and prolonged permissive hypo-
              based on the patient’s hemodynamics, to give us more time to   tension. While one must be careful to draw conclusions from
              obtain surgical control. The balloon was inflated for no more   anecdote, this case demonstrates the feasibility and success of
              than 45 minutes at any interval, and the total time of intermit-  such strategies, which have limited human data to support
              tent use was 110 minutes. Data regarding intermittent REBOA   their use.
              are limited to animal studies, and while the data are favorable,
              concerns have been published regarding the extrapolation of   Author Contributions
              these translational science studies.  In addition, it is possible   CL wrote the first draft. All other authors contributed to the
                                        25
              that the patient’s subsequent LLE ischemia and amputation are   case presentation, discussion, and revisions. All authors ap-
              related to or were caused by the multiple REBOA placements   proved the final version.
              and inflations; this is a described complication.  Despite the
                                                   26
              limited data of this experimental strategy as well as a compli-  Disclosure
              cation associated with its use, we present a case of intermittent   The authors have nothing to disclose.
              REBOA, which contributed to the patient’s survival.
                                                                 References
                                                                 1.  Butler FK, Holcomb JB, Schreiber MA, et al. Fluid resuscitation for
              In addition, this case demonstrates multiple challenges for   hemorrhagic shock in Tactical Combat Casualty Care. J Spec Oper
              the placement of REBOA  in austere  environments. As the   Med. 2014;3(June):13–38.
              discussion on far-forward austere REBOA placement evolves,   2.  Nessen SC, Eastridge BJ, Cronk D, et al. Fresh whole blood use by
              this case exemplifies the need for placement by skilled pro-  forward surgical teams in Afghanistan is associated with improved
              viders able to recognize possible vascular complications and   survival compared to component therapy without platelets. Trans-
                                                                   fusion. 2013;53(January):107–13.
              proficient in percutaneous ultrasound guided access. The use   3.  Spinella PC, Perkins JG, Grathwohl KW, et al. Warm fresh whole
              of ultrasound guidance for arterial access is proven to mini-  blood is independetly associated  with improved survival for pa-
              mize access site complications and should be considered the   tients with combat-related traumatic injuries. J Trauma. 2009;66(4
              standard  of  care  for  any  vascular  access.  Furthermore,  as   suppl):S69–S76.

                                                                    FWB, Prolonged Hypotension, and Intermittent REBOA  |  125
   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132