Page 82 - JSOM Spring 2020
P. 82

Kappa   (κ)  .87  .80      .76                      .80       .59                        .69                            .59       .76        .74              .69             .58       .53       .46



              Quality   Score  (0–33) 35  14  13  16                12        20                         15                             11        16         14               15              17        18        17













                 Main Findings (1)   Lower arithmetic and memorization score under DT practice trial  (2)   Higher visual monitoring score under DT practice trial compared  (3)   Higher arithmetic, memorization, and visual monitoring score  under DT post-practice trials compared to ST* (1)   Mean velocity in antero-posterior direction slower under DT than  (2)   No changes in reaction time between ST and DT (prefatigue only)   (1)   greater peak stance hip flexion moment duri







                     compared to ST*  to ST*  ST (prefatigue only) (P = .026)  (P > .05)  compared to anticipated cut (P = .002)  unanticipated and anticipated cuts  unanticipated and anticipated cuts  participants  (P = .002)  ST and DT (P = .42)  and DT (P = .13))  (P = .37)  decision performance  DT than ST*  experts (P = .41)  (P = .76)  experts (P = .02)  walking  identification  DT than ST (P < .001)  DT than ST (P < .001)








                 Multitask Paradigm  (1)   SynWin Multitasking  Assessment (concurrently  perform all single-task   assessments)  (1)   Postural stance while  simultaneously completing   vigilance task (“Go/No-  Go” trigger reaction)    over 720 s  (1)   Unanticipated single-leg   cut maneuver  (1)   Tracking task and systems   monitoring  (2) T  racking task, systems   monitoring, and   resource-management  (1)   Sternberg Memory Task   and Arrow Flanker  (1) Shooting and ar










                 Single-Task Paradigm  Motor Task(s): None  Cognitive Task(s):  (1) Arithmetic  (2) Memorization task  (3) Listening task  (4) Visual monitoring  Motor Task(s): (1)   Stand in bipedal shooting   position  Cognitive Task(s): None  Motor Task(s): (1)   Anticipated single-leg cut   maneuver  Cognitive Task(s):None  Motor Task(s): (1) Visual tracking task  Cognitive Task(s): None  Motor Task(s): None  Cognitive Task(s): (1) Sternberg Memory Test  (2) Arrow Flanker










                    United States Air Force cadets   (n = 1090)  Soldiers (n = 19)  Age: 31.9 ± 1.3 y  Height: 179.2 ± 1.5 cm  Weight: 80.8 ± 1.9 kg  Years of rifle shooting  experience: 12.25 ± 3.6 y  Males: 100%  Military personnel (n = 15)  Age: 20.9 ± 3.1 y  Height: 1.8 ± .1 m  Weight: 75.6 ± 11.6 kg  Males: 100%  United States Air Force ROTC   cadets (n = 10)  Age: 21.4 ± 1.0 y  Noncadets (n = 18)  Age: 19.8 ± .9 y  Males: 53.6% Iraq and Afghanistan veterans   with PTSD
           TABLE 2  Description of Articles Selected for Review
                 Participants                                                                                                                     Iraq, Afghanistan, and Vietnam   Expert law enforcement officers   Time since mTBI diagnosis: .46 y









                 Authors (Year) and Title  Barron and Rose (2017) 41  Multitasking as a Predictor  of Pilot Performance: Validity  Beyond Serial Single-Task   Assessments  Bermejo et al. (2018) 39  Fatigue does not conjointly  alter postural and cognitive  performance when standing in  a shooting position under dual-  task conditions  Brown et al. (2014) 42  Soldier-relevant loads impact  lower limb biomechanics   during anticipated and  unanticipated single-leg cutting   mov












          76  |  JSOM   Volume 20, Edition 1 / Spring 2020
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87