Page 92 - JSOM Summer 2019

Acknowledgments 11. Kamiutsuri K, et al. Analysis of prehospital endotracheal intuba-
We would like to thank the Joint Trauma System Data Analy- tion performed by emergency physicians: retrospective survey of
sis Branch for their efforts with data acquisition. a single emergency medical center in Japan. J Anesth. 2013;27(3):
374–379.
12. Schauer SG, Naylor JF, Oliver JJ, et al. An analysis of casualties
Disclaimer presenting to military emergency departments in Iraq and Af-
Opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views ghanistan. Am J Emerg Med. 2019;37(1):94–99. doi:10.1016/j
of the authors and are not to be construed as official or as .ajem.2018.04.068. Epub 2018 May 2. https://www.ncbi.nlm
reflecting the views of the Department of the Air Force, the .nih.gov/pubmed/29753547#
Department of the Army, or the Department of Defense. 13. Thoeni N, et al. Incidence of difficult airway situations during
prehospital airway management by emergency physicians—a
retrospective analysis of 692 consecutive patients. Resuscitation.
Conflicts 2015;90:42–45.
We have no conflicts to report. 14. Lecky F, et al. Emergency intubation for acutely ill and injured
patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008(2):CD001429.
Funding 15. Lockey D, et al. Observational study of the success rates of in-
We received no funding for this study. tubation and failed intubation airway rescue techniques in 7256
attempted intubations of trauma patients by pre-hospital physi-
cians. Br J Anaesth. 2014;113(2):220–225.
Author Contributions 16. Glenn MA, et al. Implementation of a combat casualty trauma
SGS is the principal investigator and was involved in all aspects registry. J Trauma Nurs. 2008;15(4):181–184.
of this study. MDA was involved in the conceptualization, 17. O’Connell KM, et al. Evaluating the Joint Theater Trauma Regis-
data interpretation, manuscript development, and manuscript try as a data source to benchmark casualty care. Mil Med. 2012;
revisions. JKM, CWC, LIT, and MBB were involved in data 177(5):546–552.
interpretation, manuscript development, and manuscript revi- 18. Haasper C, et al. [The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS). Options and
sions. AAA was involved in data analysis, data interpretation, problems in application]. Unfallchirurg. 2010;113(5):366–372.
and manuscript development. SAS was involved in the concep- 19. Foreman BP, et al. Usefulness of the Abbreviated Injury Score
and the Injury Severity Score in comparison to the Glasgow
tualization, data interpretation, manuscript development, and Coma Scale in predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury. J
manuscript revisions. All authors contributed substantially to Trauma. 2007;62(4):946–950.
this study. 20. American College of Surgeons Committee. Advanced Trauma
Life Support (ATLS(R)): The Ninth Edition. J Trauma Acute Care
Surg. 2013;74(5):1363–1366.
References 21. Chesnut RM, et al. The role of secondary brain injury in deter-
1. Eastridge BJ, et al. Died of wounds on the battlefield: causation
and implications for improving combat casualty care. J Trauma. mining outcome from severe head injury. J Trauma. 1993;34(2):
216–222.
2011;71(1 Suppl):S4–S8.
2. Eastridge BJ, et al. Death on the battlefield (2001–2011): implica- 22. Connick RM, et al. Procedural confidence in hospital based prac-
titioners: implications for the training and practice of doctors at
tions for the future of combat casualty care. J Trauma Acute Care
Surg. 2012;73(6 Suppl 5):S431–S437. all grades. BMC Med Educ. 2009;9:2.
3. Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines for medical person- 23. Mosier J, et al. A comparison of the GlideScope video laryngo-
nel. http://www.usaisr.amedd.army.mil/pdfs/TCCCGuidelinesfor scope to the C-MAC video laryngoscope for intubation in the
emergency department. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61(4):414–420 e1.
MedicalPersonnel170131Final.pdf, Accessed 15 September 2017.
4. Adams BD, et al. Registry of emergency airways arriving at com- 24. Chang RS, et al. Declining rate of cricothyrotomy in trauma pa-
tients with an emergency medicine residency: implications for
bat hospitals. J Trauma. 2008;64(6):1548–1554.
skills training. Acad Emerg Med. 1998;5(3):247–251.
5. Gaither JB, et al. Prevalence of difficult airway predictors in 25. Cobas MA, et al. Prehospital intubations and mortality: a level 1
cases of failed prehospital endotracheal intubation. J Emerg Med.
2014;47(3):294–300. trauma center perspective. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(2):489–493.
6. Pepe PE, et al. Prehospital endotracheal intubation: elemental or 26. Reed P, et al. Single rescuer ventilation using a bag valve mask
detrimental? Crit Care. 2015;19:121. with removable external handle: a randomized crossover trial.
7. Wang HE, et al. Multivariate predictors of failed prehospital en- Prehosp Disaster Med. 2017:1–6.
dotracheal intubation. Acad Emerg Med. 2003;10(7):717–724. 27. Zobrist B, et al. Single rescuer ventilation using a bag-valve mask
8. Carlson JN, et al. Derivation and validation of the Prehospital with internal handle: a randomized crossover trial. Am J Emerg
Med. 2016;34(10):1991–1996.
Difficult Airway IdentificationTool (PreDAIT): a predictive model 28. Amack AJ, et al. Comparison of ventilation with one-handed
for difficult intubation. West J Emerg Med. 2017;18(4):662–672.
9. Denninghoff KR, et al. Prehospital intubation is associated with mask seal with an intraoral mask versus conventional cuffed
face mask in a cadaver model: a randomized crossover trial. Ann
favorable outcomes and lower mortality in ProTECT III. Prehosp
Emerg Care. 2017;21(5):539–544. Emerg Med. 2017;69(1):12–17.
10. Fouche PF, et al. Nonphysician out-of-hospital rapid sequence 29. Robinson JB, et al. Battlefield documentation of Tactical Combat
intubation success and adverse events: a systematic review and Casualty Care in Afghanistan. US Army Med Dep J. 2016(2–16):
87–94.
meta-analysis. Ann Emerg Med. 2017;70(4):449–459 e20.

90 | JSOM Volume 19, Edition 2 / Summer 2019