Page 99 - JSOM Winter 2017
P. 99

An Ongoing Series



                   Optimizing Musculoskeletal Performance Through Injury Prevention



              Sarah J. de la Motte, PhD, MPH, ATC*; Timothy C. Gribbin, MEd, ATC; Patricia A. Deuster, PhD, MPH




              ABSTRACT
              Musculoskeletal injuries (MSK-Is) are ubiquitous throughout   SOF, musculoskeletal issues and MSK-I pain are just part of
              the Special Operations Forces (SOF) because of the physical   doing their job. Hence, MSK-I prevention in SOF communities
              demands of executing missions and carrying heavy loads. Pre-  remains an uphill battle, and those tasked with carrying out
              venting MSK-I has been a priority among SOF but is especially   injury prevention (e.g., physicians, athletic trainers, strength
              challenging because most MSK-Is are chronic or recurring. For   and conditioning specialists) are challenged to find ways to
              many SOF, musculoskeletal issues and MSK pain are just part   insert techniques into daily training. Ways to focus, target,
              of doing their job. Ways to focus, target, and integrate injury   and integrate injury prevention efforts across the continuum
              prevention efforts across the continuum of training, active duty   of training, active duty, and SOF status are critical because
              and SOF status are critical because MSK-Is are a significant   MSK-Is are a significant barrier to human performance opti-
              barrier to human performance optimization. In this article, we   mization (HPO).
              describe how to incorporate these efforts at all levels of train-
              ing. The need for improving valid, objective, fit-for-full-duty   In this article, we describe why it is essential for MSK-I pre-
              metrics after injury and sharing such information continuously   vention to be focused, targeted, and integrated at all levels of
              with SOF is discussed. Last, strategies for engaging all levels to   training and into the SOF life cycle. We describe the need for
              begin a culture shift away from the acceptance of MSK-I and   improving valid, objective fit-for-full-duty metrics after injury
              pain as a way of life toward embracing MSK-I prevention as a   and sharing such information in a continuous fashion across
              regular part of everyday training are presented.   the SOF life cycle. Last, we describe strategies for engaging
                                                                 all levels to begin a culture shift away from the acceptance of
              Keywords:  musculoskeletal injury; injury prevention; pain;   MSK-I and pain as a way of life toward embracing of MSK-I
              human performance optimization                     prevention as a regular part of everyday training.

                                                                 What Does MSK-I Prevention Mean for SOF?
              Introduction
                                                                 Key questions about the most effective and best strategies for
              Musculoskeletal injuries (MSK-Is) are ubiquitous throughout   MSK-I prevention remain; however, because the single great-
              the Special Operations Forces (SOF) because of the physical   est predictor of MSK-I is a history of previous MSK-I, ef-
              demands of executing missions and carrying heavy loads.   forts to introduce MSK-I prevention strategies on entry into
              They are also one of the most burdensome conditions and a   the military and then ensure progressive endeavors continue
                                  1–4
              leading cause of disability.  Thus, preventing MSK-I is (and   throughout training are essential. For motivated SOF candi-
              has been) a top priority among SOF, Special Operations Com-  dates, MSK-Is are often hidden, and a cycle of not addressing
              mand (SOCOM) Preservation of the Force and Family, provid-  particular injuries (which could have easily been treated) may
              ers, and researchers. For SOF in particular, injury prevention   continue for years. Thus, knowingly or not, MSK-I preven-
              is especially challenging because most MSK-Is are not primary   tion efforts targeted to SOF may inherently be secondary (i.e.,
              but rather are chronic or recurring injuries; some may have   prevention of re-injury) and/or tertiary prevention (i.e., reha-
              been present for years. More importantly, many SOF prefer   bilitation from an old injury, managing a current injury and
              not to seek medical help, because anything that might even   preventing it from further damage) rather than addressing the
              potentially keep them from their jobs is evaded. By the time   root of the problem. 5
              an Operator has completed the required years of training to
              become a member of a SOF unit or team, he is likely to have   Life Cycle of SOF and MSK-I Prevention
              sustained multiple MSK-Is and not undergone the necessary
              treatment and rehabilitation to adequately heal and recover,   The life cycle of SOF is a subset of the Warfighter life cycle
              thereby perpetually remaining in a suboptimal state. For many   (Figure 1). At the start of the life cycle, a recruit or officer
              *Address correspondence to sarah.delamotte@usuhs.edu
              Dr de la Motte is an assistant professor and scientific director, Mr Gribbin is a research associate, and Dr Deuster is a professor and director of
              the Consortium for Health and Military Performance: A Defense Center of Excellence, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uni-
              formed Services University, Bethesda, MD.

                                                              97
   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104