Page 124 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Winter 2016
P. 124

all SOCOM forces operating in austere environments is   Conclusion
          one of the most high-yield, immediately available meth-  VC3 is an immediately available method to reduce med-
          ods to reduce medical risk. The investment needed to   ical risk in gray-zone operating environments. It meets
          achieve such scaling is small: call-forwarding software   the SOCOM requirement for telemedicine support of
          to ensure that a medic’s call will be answered if the pri-  decentralized operations. With minimal investment,
          mary on-call provider is occupied or out of coverage   VC3 can be sustained and scaled to all SOCOM forces.
          range, a coordinator to manage a roster of critical care   This is an essential first step before exploring additional
          physicians who volunteer to take VC3 calls, and a re-  capabilities or scaling to support conventional force
          search coordinator to collect data from the calls, thus   operations.
          helping to further refine the system and enable future
          enhancements in operational telemedicine. 4
                                                             Key points
          All branches of the military employ physicians with the
          required training and experience to be expert VC3 con-  •  The VC3 service is a direct link between medics in
          sultants. Establishing a cadre of VC3 providers requires   austere environments and critical care subject matter
          selection, vetting, and training, as well as recognition of   experts that enables best possible care of critically in-
          activities in support of operational teleconsultation by   jured and sick patients during PFC.
          parent medical directorates. Regarding the former, the   •  VC3  provides  effective  consultation  by  telephone;
          importance of a critical care provider (receiver) under-  meeting a core  requirement voiced by SOF  medics
          standing the operational context of the SOF provider   that telemedicine be accessible in a wide variety of
          (sender) cannot be overstated. Introducing providers to   environments without specialized communications
          VC3 via participation in training events ensures that phy-  equipment. The addition of images transmitted by e-
          sicians have a working knowledge of the equipment and   mail can enhance communication but is not a require-
          capabilities of the SOF medic and develop rapport, both   ment.
          of which will optimize real-world interactions. VC3 pro-  •  The VC3 service has demonstrated success in multiple
          viders should be afforded the opportunity to train in the   training and real-world scenarios.
          field with the medics they may be supporting, to stay cur-  •  Access to this service is expanding and is available to
          rent with training levels and equipment used. In this con-  US SOF units for training and operational use via unit
          text, traditional metrics of physician performance such as   surgeon sections, Theater Special Operations Com-
          productivity or revenue generating units may be difficult   mand Surgeon sections, and the Special Operations
          to extrapolate from VC3 encounters and training. Modi-  Medical Association (SOMA) PFC Working Group.
          fication of the VC3 service to fit current productivity
          and reimbursement standards would be detrimental, and   Acknowledgments
          would likely discourage SOF medic use, and thus nega-
          tively impact patient outcomes. Because the primary role   We thank the following individuals for their efforts in
          of military medicine is the support of combat operations,   this project: the innumerable medics who offered advice
          metrics that account for the value of physician partici-  during the development and testing of this service. COL
          pation in programs that support operations and reduce   Daniel Kral, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology
          operational risk, such as VC3, should be developed.  Center (TATRC), for his leadership and mentorship with
                                                             getting this program started, as well as Gary Gilbert and
          Future Directions                                  James Beach, TATRC, for their continued support; Ni-
          Current efforts are focused on expanding this pilot pro-  cole Caldwell, US Army Institute of Surgical Research
          gram to allow all deployed forces access to the consulta-  (USAISR), for her support with maintaining research
          tion service. Additional effort is underway to create a   and regulatory files; LTC(P) Kevin Chung, COL Mi-
          unified military program that includes immediate access   chael Wirt, and LTC(P) Andre Cap, USAISR, for their
          to multiple subspecialty services and guidelines regard-  notable support of this effort; and LTC(P) Kevin Chung,
          ing access to this system across the spectrum of illness   USAISR, and MAJ James Lantry and LTC Philip Ma-
          (i.e., routine, nonurgent consultation through immedi-  son, San Antonio Military Medical Center, for provid-
          ate/emergency consultation). Pursuit of technology must   ing exceptional consultative advice during VC3 calls.
          allow telemedicine services to remain flexible and scal-
          able according to SOF mission needs and account for   Funding
          wide variation in technological capability at the point of
          need. Research efforts are ongoing to determine when   This effort was initiated in conjunction with funding by
          or if more advanced technologies can provide better   an Army Medical Department Advance Medical Tech-
          consultation and improve patient outcomes than the   nology Initiative grant from the Telemedicine and Ad-
          voice and e-mail consultation solutions described here.  vance Technology Center.



          108                                    Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 16, Edition 4/Winter 2016
   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129