Page 50 - Journal of Special Operations Medicine - Spring 2015
P. 50

®
          Figure 1  (A) Combat Application Tourniquet  (Composite Resources, Inc.; combattourniquet.com). (B) Tactical Ratcheting
                            ®
          Medical Tourniquet (m2  Inc.; www.ratchetingbuckles.com).
              (A)                                               (B)
















          the tourniquet strap and accompanying folding of the     UnityPoint Health–Des Moines Iowa Methodist Medi­
          limb tissues. The amount of strap bunching is expected   cal Center. Two RMTs were previously requested from
          to be directly related to the amount of mechanical ad­  and donated by m2  inc. An additional RMT was re­
                                                                              ®
          vantage system use (windlass turns or ladder distance   quested from and donated by m2  inc. during the study.
                                                                                         ®
          traveled). Lower tourniquet pressures prior to engaging   The two CATs were purchased.
          the mechanical advantage system require more mechani­
          cal advantage system use and, therefore, are expected to   Tourniquets
          be associated with more strap bunching. If strap bunch­  This study used tourniquets with two different me­
          ing significantly affects pressure transduction to the ar­  chanical advantage systems: the windlass CAT and the
          tery, then changing the tourniquet pressure present at   ratcheting Tactical RMT (Figure 1). Issues encountered
          the beginning of use of the mechanical advantage system   during the study led to the use of two CATs and three
          should change the tourniquet­applied skin surface pres­  Tactical RMTs. Those issues are described in the Results.
          sure at which arterial occlusion occurs.
                                                             The two CATs used in this study were of the same man­
          The objective of this study was to examine the influence   ufacturing generation. The CATs had a 3.8cm­wide,
          of the initial secured pressure on tourniquet variables at   92.5cm­long, hook­and­loop covered fabric strap con­
          occlusion and completion with two different mechani­  taining a 2.5cm­wide inner strap. The friction buckle
          cal advantage systems. The initial secured pressure   of each CAT was a two­slot, flat, plastic friction buckle
          is the skin surface pressure when the strap is secured   with grip­slot edges. The mechanical advantage system
          through the friction buckle with no use of the mechani­  of each CAT was the running of the inner 2.5cm strap
          cal advantage system and is defined as Friction Pressure   through a slot on the windlass, the turning of which
          in this study. The two different mechanical advantage   would wind the inner strap around the windlass, result­
          systems are the windlass and the ratchet. With the   ing in pulling of the inner strap through the hook­and­
          windlass system, strap bunching against skin can occur   loop covered 3.8cm strap. The 2.5cm inner strap was
          everywhere except under the firm area present under   attached inside the free end of the 3.8cm strap in one
          the Base (Figure 1A). With the ratchet system, strap   direction and around the friction buckle on the other
          bunching against  skin  can  only  occur  under  the firm   side of the 9.3cm­long base plate. Shortening the inner
          area present under the Ladder (Figure 1B). The over­  strap, therefore, resulted in increasing applied pressure
          all hypothesis was that Friction Pressure would have   on the surface of the limb. Both CATs had the follow­
          a consistent influence on the amount of pressure that   ing discomfort­reducing modifications made by the au­
          must be applied by the tourniquet to the skin surface to   thors: The bare hook surface of the hook­and­loop on
          achieve arterial occlusion.                        the skin side of the rod locking clip was covered, and
                                                             the sharp corners of the base on the end near the friction
                                                             buckle were covered with the tape securing the pressure
          Methods
                                                             monitoring size #1 neonatal blood pressure cuff.
          This prospective study investigated the effects of Fric­
          tion Pressure on tourniquet­applied skin surface pres­  The three Tactical RMTs were from three manufactur­
          sure at arterial occlusion when using CATs and Tactical   ing generations (identified as versions A, B, and C in
          RMTs, and was approved by the UnityPoint Health–   this study). Each had a 3.8cm­wide fabric strap with an
          Des  Moines  Iowa Methodist  Medical  Center  Institu­  attached toothed ladder (linear rack with teeth) and a
          tional Review Board. The study was conducted at the   friction buckle composed of a pair of overlapping metal



          40                                      Journal of Special Operations Medicine  Volume 15, Edition 1/Spring 2015
   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55